Literature DB >> 17661076

Quality of life diagnosis and therapy as complex intervention for improvement of health in breast cancer patients: delineating the conceptual, methodological, and logistic requirements (modeling).

Monika Klinkhammer-Schalke1, Michael Koller, Jeremy C Wyatt, Brunhilde Steinger, Christoph Ehret, Brigitte Ernst, Ferdinand Hofstädter, Wilfried Lorenz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: A system for quality of life (QoL) diagnosis and therapy in breast cancer patients was developed according to the Medical Research Council (MRC) framework of complex interventions. Along MRC's five phases in the continuum of evidence, the present paper deals with phase I: modeling (i.e., delineating the conceptual, methodological, and logistic requirements). BASIC ELEMENTS: Theoretical background is a new conceptualization of QoL that provides a rational basis to diagnose "diseased" QoL. A care pathway as the central part of modeling is composed of the following interrelated structural elements: patients (n = 170), clinicians (n = 10), experts in a quality of life unit (n = 5), coordinating practitioners (n = 38), local opinion leaders (n = 12), and professional therapists for QoL enhancing therapies (n = 75). Networking of these structural elements was achieved by clinical algorithm. In the clinical center, the patient and doctor delivered a questionnaire (EORTC) and health status report. The QoL unit transformed it into a profile and experts' report. The coordinating practitioner transformed the latter into a decision on QoL therapy and the care pathway ended with the professional therapists. Implementation of this system used a multifaceted strategy including educational outreach visits, local opinion leaders, and quality circles.
CONCLUSION: The suffering cancer patient is the main focus of this QoL diagnosis and therapy system. It will have to pass the rigorous test of a definitive randomized trial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17661076     DOI: 10.1007/s00423-007-0210-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg        ISSN: 1435-2443            Impact factor:   3.445


  33 in total

1.  Changing provider behavior: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions.

Authors:  J M Grimshaw; L Shirran; R Thomas; G Mowatt; C Fraser; L Bero; R Grilli; E Harvey; A Oxman; M A O'Brien
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Effect of presentation of partogram information on obstetric decision-making.

Authors:  R S Cartmill; J G Thornton
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992-06-20       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Health-related quality-of-life assessments and patient-physician communication: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Symone B Detmar; Martin J Muller; Jan H Schornagel; Lidwina D V Wever; Neil K Aaronson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-12-18       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 4.  Interpretation of quality of life changes.

Authors:  E Lydick; R S Epstein
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Improving drug-therapy decisions through educational outreach. A randomized controlled trial of academically based "detailing".

Authors:  J Avorn; S B Soumerai
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1983-06-16       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Outcome and quality of life in medicine: a conceptual framework to put quality of life research into practice.

Authors:  Michael Koller; Monika Klinkhammer-Schalke; Wilfried Lorenz
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.498

7.  [Diagnosis and therapy of illness-related quality of life in breast cancer patients. Protocol of a randomized clinical trial at the Regensburg Tumour Centre].

Authors:  Michael Koller; Monika Klinkhammer-Schalke; Christoph Ehret; Brunhilde Steinger; Brigitte Ernst; Ferdinand Hofstädter; Wilfried Lorenz
Journal:  Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich       Date:  2006

Review 8.  Second step: testing-outcome measurements.

Authors:  W Lorenz; H Troidl; J S Solomkin; C Nies; H Sitter; M Koller; W Krack; M F Roizen
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Symptom reporting in cancer patients: the role of negative affect and experienced social stigma.

Authors:  M Koller; J Kussman; W Lorenz; M Jenkins; M Voss; E Arens; E Richter; M Rothmund
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1996-03-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Computer-based quality of life questionnaires may contribute to doctor-patient interactions in oncology.

Authors:  G Velikova; J M Brown; A B Smith; P J Selby
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2002-01-07       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  9 in total

1.  Direct improvement of quality of life using a tailored quality of life diagnosis and therapy pathway: randomised trial in 200 women with breast cancer.

Authors:  M Klinkhammer-Schalke; M Koller; B Steinger; C Ehret; B Ernst; J C Wyatt; F Hofstädter; W Lorenz
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 7.640

2.  Breast cancer survivors' recollection of their illness and therapy seven years after enrolment into a randomised controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Patricia Lindberg; Michael Koller; Brunhilde Steinger; Wilfried Lorenz; Jeremy C Wyatt; Elisabeth C Inwald; Monika Klinkhammer-Schalke
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 4.430

3.  Direct improvement of quality of life in colorectal cancer patients using a tailored pathway with quality of life diagnosis and therapy (DIQOL): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Monika Klinkhammer-Schalke; Patricia Lindberg; Michael Koller; Jeremy C Wyatt; Ferdinand Hofstädter; Wilfried Lorenz; Brunhilde Steinger
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 2.279

4.  A cluster-randomised, controlled proof-of-concept study to explore the feasibility and effect of a patient-directed intervention on quality of life in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma.

Authors:  Markus Schuler; Stephan Richter; Gerhard Ehninger; Martin Bornhäuser; Leopold Hentschel
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Feasibility and acceptance of electronic quality of life assessment in general practice: an implementation study.

Authors:  Anja Rogausch; Jörg Sigle; Anna Seibert; Sabine Thüring; Michael M Kochen; Wolfgang Himmel
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 3.186

6.  Implementing a system of quality-of-life diagnosis and therapy for breast cancer patients: results of an exploratory trial as a prerequisite for a subsequent RCT.

Authors:  M Klinkhammer-Schalke; M Koller; C Ehret; B Steinger; B Ernst; J C Wyatt; F Hofstädter; W Lorenz
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Quality of reporting of complex healthcare interventions and applicability of the CReDECI list - a survey of publications indexed in PubMed.

Authors:  Ralph Möhler; Gabriele Bartoszek; Gabriele Meyer
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2013-10-19       Impact factor: 4.615

8.  Integrated Care Planning for Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Anum Irfan Khan; Erin Arthurs; Sharon Gradin; Marnie MacKinnon; Jonathan Sussman; Vishal Kukreti
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 5.120

9.  Long-term improvement of quality of life in patients with breast cancer: supporting patient-physician communication by an electronic tool for inpatient and outpatient care.

Authors:  Patricia Lindberg-Scharf; Brunhilde Steinger; Michael Koller; Andrea Hofstädter; Olaf Ortmann; Jan Kurz; Jonathan Sasse; Monika Klinkhammer-Schalke
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2021-06-27       Impact factor: 3.603

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.