Literature DB >> 17660078

Closing the gap in operative performance between novices and experts: does harder mean better for laparoscopic simulator training?

Dimitrios Stefanidis1, James R Korndorffer, Sarah Markley, Rafael Sierra, B Todd Heniford, Daniel J Scott.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We have previously shown that reaching expert performance on an fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS)-type simulator model for laparoscopic suturing results in measurable improvement during an actual operation; trained novices, however, demonstrate inferior operative performance compared with experts. We hypothesized that simulator training under more difficult and realistic conditions would enhance the operative performance of novices. STUDY
DESIGN: Medical students (n=32) participated in an IRB-approved, randomized, controlled trial. All participants were pretested in laparoscopic suturing on a previously validated porcine Nissen model and were randomized into three groups: group I (n=6) received no training, group II (n=13) trained on the FLS videotrainer model until a previously published proficiency score (512) was achieved on 2 consecutive and 10 additional attempts, group III (n=13) trained to the same goal but had to practice in a constrained space, with a shorter suture, starting with a dropped needle, and listening to operating room noise. Training workload was measured with the validated NASA-TLX (Task Load Index) questionnaire after each training session. All groups were posttested on the porcine model. Results were compared using ANOVA; p < 0.05 was considered significant.
RESULTS: All group II and III participants reached the training goal. At posttesting, group II and group III participants performed similarly, but substantially better than group I did (210+/-140 versus 218+/-139 versus 0+/-0, respectively; p < 0.001). Compared with group II, group III participants trained longer (329+/-71 minutes versus 239+/-69 minutes, p < 0.001), performed more repetitions (81+/-15 versus 59+/-14, p < 0.001), and their workload improved less by the end of training (5% versus 23%, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Proficiency-based simulator training reliably results in improved operative performance. Although increasing the level of training difficulty increased trainees' workload, the strategy we used in this study did not enhance their operative performance. Other methods for curriculum optimization are needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17660078     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.02.080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  27 in total

1.  Patient Simulation for Assessment of Layperson Management of Opioid Overdose With Intranasal Naloxone in a Recently Released Prisoner Cohort.

Authors:  Leo Kobayashi; Traci C Green; Sarah E Bowman; Madeline C Ray; Michelle S McKenzie; Josiah D Rich
Journal:  Simul Healthc       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.929

2.  Validation of laparoscopic surgical skills training outside the operating room: a long road.

Authors:  N J Hogle; L Chang; V E M Strong; A O U Welcome; M Sinaan; R Bailey; D L Fowler
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Immersive training: breaking the bubble and measuring the heat.

Authors:  Jon R Pluyter; Anne-F Rutkowski; Jack J Jakimowicz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Robotic assistance improves intracorporeal suturing performance and safety in the operating room while decreasing operator workload.

Authors:  Dimitrios Stefanidis; Fikre Wang; James R Korndorffer; J Bruce Dunne; Daniel J Scott
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Mastery versus the standard proficiency target for basic laparoscopic skill training: effect on skill transfer and retention.

Authors:  Nicoleta O Kolozsvari; Pepa Kaneva; Chantalle Brace; Genevieve Chartrand; Marilou Vaillancourt; Jiguo Cao; Daniel Banaszek; Sebastian Demyttenaere; Melina C Vassiliou; Gerald M Fried; Liane S Feldman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  [Laparoscopic single port surgery : Is structured training necessary?].

Authors:  K Krajinovic; C T Germer
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 0.955

7.  Increasing efficiency of surgical training: effects of spacing practice on skill acquisition and retention in laparoscopy training.

Authors:  Edward N Spruit; Guido P H Band; Jaap F Hamming
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Effectiveness of a comprehensive mental skills curriculum in enhancing surgical performance: Results of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Dimitrios Stefanidis; Nicholas E Anton; Lisa D Howley; Eric Bean; Ashley Yurco; Manuel E Pimentel; Cameron K Davis
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Comprehensive training curricula for minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Vanessa N Palter
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2011-09

10.  Characterizing the learning curve of a virtual intracorporeal suturing simulator VBLaST-SS©.

Authors:  Yaoyu Fu; Lora Cavuoto; Di Qi; Karthikeyan Panneerselvam; Venkata Sreekanth Arikatla; Andinet Enquobahrie; Suvranu De; Steven D Schwaitzberg
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.