Literature DB >> 17659968

Risk factors for noncompliance with follow-up among normal-tension glaucoma suspects.

Rose Ngan1, Deborah L Lam, Raghu C Mudumbai, Philip P Chen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate noncompliance with follow-up in normal-tension glaucoma (NTG) suspects.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
METHODS: We reviewed 203 patient charts at a university eye clinic, identified as NTG suspects from a database of optic disk photographs. Noncompliance was defined as less than one year of follow-up and/or fewer than two completed visual field (VF) tests.
RESULTS: Twenty-two patients (11%) were excluded because at least two VF tests were not ordered. The 181 patients analyzed included 45 (25%) non-Whites and 16 (9%) non-English speakers. Eighty-three patients (46%) were noncompliant. These patients were significantly younger (50.5 +/- 15.0 years vs 55.1 +/- 12.8 years; P = .028), were more likely to speak English (P = .023), and were more likely to have no or unknown health insurance (P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Almost half of NTG suspects lacked appropriate follow-up. Lack of health insurance may be a significant barrier to compliance with follow-up in this population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17659968     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.04.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  10 in total

1.  Compliance and knowledge about glaucoma in patients at tertiary glaucoma units.

Authors:  Kaweh Mansouri; Milko E Iliev; Kaspar Rohrer; Tarek Shaarawy
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Glaucoma public service announcements: factors associated with follow-up of participants with risk factors for glaucoma.

Authors:  Zakary Hoffelt; Shawn Fallon; Brad A Wong; Betty Lucas; Anne L Coleman; Richard P Mills; Richard Wilson; Steven L Mansberger
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 12.079

3.  Assessment of patient opinions of different clinical tests used in the management of glaucoma.

Authors:  Stuart K Gardiner; Shaban Demirel
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 12.079

4.  Clinical Pharmacist interventions in Refill Clinic at Tertiary Care Eye Specialist Hospital.

Authors:  Sitah N Alzuman; Abdullah S Al-Humaidan
Journal:  Saudi Pharm J       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Proposing new indicators for glaucoma healthcare service.

Authors:  Yuan Bo Liang; Ye Zhang; David C Musch; Nathan Congdon
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2017-03-07

6.  Glaucoma Suspects: The Impact of Risk Factor-Driven Review Periods on Clinical Load, Diagnoses, and Healthcare Costs.

Authors:  Jack Phu; Katherine Masselos; Michael Sullivan-Mee; Michael Kalloniatis
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 3.283

7.  An Initiative to Improve Follow-up of Patients with Glaucoma.

Authors:  Calvin C Robbins; Sidrah Anjum; Amer Mosa Alwreikat; Michael Lee Cooper; Paul R Cotran; Shiyoung Roh; David J Ramsey
Journal:  Ophthalmol Sci       Date:  2021-09-22

8.  Impact of patient access to Internet health records on glaucoma medication: randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Kenji Kashiwagi; Shigeo Tsukahara
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 5.428

9.  Factors contributing to nonadherence to follow-up appointments in a resident glaucoma clinic versus primary eye care clinic.

Authors:  Scott J Fudemberg; Brian Lee; Michael Waisbourd; Rachel A Murphy; Yang Dai; Benjamin E Leiby; Lisa A Hark
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 2.711

Review 10.  Videographic Assessment of Glaucoma Drop Instillation.

Authors:  Gabriel Lazcano-Gomez; Armando Castillejos; Malik Kahook; Jesus Jimenez-Roman; Roberto Gonzalez-Salinas
Journal:  J Curr Glaucoma Pract       Date:  2015-09-25
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.