Literature DB >> 21439644

Glaucoma public service announcements: factors associated with follow-up of participants with risk factors for glaucoma.

Zakary Hoffelt1, Shawn Fallon, Brad A Wong, Betty Lucas, Anne L Coleman, Richard P Mills, Richard Wilson, Steven L Mansberger.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the prevalence of follow-up and factors associated with completing an eye examination after a glaucoma public service announcement.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional observational study. PARTICIPANTS: Individuals who participated in the Glaucoma EyeCare Program by calling a toll-free telephone number and receiving referral by meeting inclusion criteria.
METHODS: The Glaucoma EyeCare Program uses public service announcements to encourage those at increased risk for glaucoma to obtain an eye examination. The program requires interested persons to dial a toll-free telephone number to collect demographic, medical, and socioeconomic information, and refers those at higher risk of glaucoma to an ophthalmologist for a free eye examination. The ophthalmologist completes an outcome form, which indicates whether the participant obtained an eye examination and the results of this eye examination. We determined the factors associated with obtaining an eye examination. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sociodemographic characteristics associated with obtaining an eye examination after referral through the Glaucoma EyeCare Program.
RESULTS: Ophthalmologists returned outcome forms for 1514 of 6343 participants (24%). Of those with outcome forms, 671 (44.3%) had an eye examination, 756 (49.9%) did not make an appointment, and 87 (5.7%) made an appointment but did not complete the examination. A multivariate logistic regression model showed younger age, female gender, lack of health insurance, medical history of diabetes, and shorter distance to be associated with obtaining an eye examination.
CONCLUSIONS: Public service announcements encourage participants to have an eye examination. Multiple factors alter the success of obtaining an eye examination. Future studies are needed regarding the best method of decreasing the risk of undiagnosed glaucoma.
Copyright © 2011 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21439644      PMCID: PMC3129494          DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.12.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  28 in total

1.  Conducting community-based, culturally specific, eye disease screening clinics for urban African Americans with diabetes.

Authors:  Robert M Anderson; Fredric M Wolf; David C Musch; James T Fitzgerald; Mark W Johnson; Robin B Nwankwo; Lynne S Robins; Mary S Oh; Mary Lou Gillard
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.847

2.  Prevalence of glaucoma. The Beaver Dam Eye Study.

Authors:  B E Klein; R Klein; W E Sponsel; T Franke; L B Cantor; J Martone; M J Menage
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 12.079

3.  National survey of the prevalence and risk factors of glaucoma in St. Lucia, West Indies. Part I. Prevalence findings.

Authors:  R P Mason; O Kosoko; M R Wilson; J F Martone; C L Cowan; J C Gear; D Ross-Degnan
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 12.079

4.  Racial variations in the prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma. The Baltimore Eye Survey.

Authors:  J M Tielsch; A Sommer; J Katz; R M Royall; H A Quigley; J Javitt
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991-07-17       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Gender differences of symptom reporting and medical health care utilization in the German population.

Authors:  K H Ladwig; B Marten-Mittag; B Formanek; G Dammann
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 8.082

6.  Community screening for eye disease by laypersons: the Hoffberger program.

Authors:  Harry A Quigley; Chan Kee Park; Patricia A Tracey; Irvin P Pollack
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  The impact of a celebrity promotional campaign on the use of colon cancer screening: the Katie Couric effect.

Authors:  Peter Cram; A Mark Fendrick; John Inadomi; Mark E Cowen; Daniel Carpenter; Sandeep Vijan
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2003-07-14

8.  Association of diabetes, comorbidities, and A1C with functional disability in older adults: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), 1999-2006.

Authors:  Rita Rastogi Kalyani; Christopher D Saudek; Frederick L Brancati; Elizabeth Selvin
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2010-02-25       Impact factor: 19.112

9.  Relationship between intraocular pressure and primary open angle glaucoma among white and black Americans. The Baltimore Eye Survey.

Authors:  A Sommer; J M Tielsch; J Katz; H A Quigley; J D Gottsch; J Javitt; K Singh
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1991-08

10.  Bias in self-reported family history and relationship to glaucoma: the Blue Mountains Eye Study.

Authors:  Paul Mitchell; Elena Rochtchina; Anne J Lee; Jie Jin Wang
Journal:  Ophthalmic Epidemiol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.648

View more
  2 in total

1.  Predictive value of screening tests for visually significant eye disease.

Authors:  Laura J Kopplin; Steven L Mansberger
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 5.258

2.  Improving Access to Eye Care among Persons at High-Risk of Glaucoma in Philadelphia--Design and Methodology: The Philadelphia Glaucoma Detection and Treatment Project.

Authors:  Lisa Hark; Michael Waisbourd; Jonathan S Myers; Jeffrey Henderer; John E Crews; Jinan B Saaddine; Jeanne Molineaux; Deiana Johnson; Harjeet Sembhi; Shayla Stratford; Ayman Suleiman; Laura Pizzi; George L Spaeth; L Jay Katz
Journal:  Ophthalmic Epidemiol       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 1.648

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.