PURPOSE: To measure accurately the upper cervical cord cross-sectional area (CSA) in patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), and normal control subjects, to address the paradox that longitudinal reduction in CSA has been detected in RRMS while reduction compared to controls has not. We hypothesized that a lack of statistical power and/or measurement sensitivity due to partial volume averaging in previous studies contributed to this paradox. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using a technique that corrects for partial volume averaging, we measured the CSA in 35 normal controls and 35 RRMS patients. We used the total intracranial volume (TICV) to normalize the CSA and therefore reduce the normal variance and improve the statistical power. RESULTS: The mean TICV did not differ between groups. Statistical power analysis indicated that a 5% reduction in CSA in the patients could be detected with an estimated power of 0.74 before normalization and 0.9 after. The mean CSA in the patients was not reduced compared to controls after (P = 0.928) or before (P = 0.881) normalization. CONCLUSION: Using a sensitive analysis method, and apparently appropriate statistical power, we did not detect reduced CSA in RRMS patients. We hypothesize that this may be due to inflammation. Copyright 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
PURPOSE: To measure accurately the upper cervical cord cross-sectional area (CSA) in patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), and normal control subjects, to address the paradox that longitudinal reduction in CSA has been detected in RRMS while reduction compared to controls has not. We hypothesized that a lack of statistical power and/or measurement sensitivity due to partial volume averaging in previous studies contributed to this paradox. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using a technique that corrects for partial volume averaging, we measured the CSA in 35 normal controls and 35 RRMS patients. We used the total intracranial volume (TICV) to normalize the CSA and therefore reduce the normal variance and improve the statistical power. RESULTS: The mean TICV did not differ between groups. Statistical power analysis indicated that a 5% reduction in CSA in the patients could be detected with an estimated power of 0.74 before normalization and 0.9 after. The mean CSA in the patients was not reduced compared to controls after (P = 0.928) or before (P = 0.881) normalization. CONCLUSION: Using a sensitive analysis method, and apparently appropriate statistical power, we did not detect reduced CSA in RRMS patients. We hypothesize that this may be due to inflammation. Copyright 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Authors: Adam B Cohen; Mohit Neema; Ashish Arora; Elisa Dell'oglio; Ralph H B Benedict; Shahamat Tauhid; Daniel Goldberg-Zimring; Christian Chavarro-Nieto; Antonella Ceccarelli; Joshua P Klein; James M Stankiewicz; Maria K Houtchens; Guy J Buckle; David C Alsop; Charles R G Guttmann; Rohit Bakshi Journal: J Neuroimaging Date: 2011-03-29 Impact factor: 2.486
Authors: Nico Papinutto; Carlo Asteggiano; Antje Bischof; Tristan J Gundel; Eduardo Caverzasi; William A Stern; Stefano Bastianello; Stephen L Hauser; Roland G Henry Journal: J Neuroimaging Date: 2019-09-30 Impact factor: 2.486
Authors: Nico Papinutto; Christian Cordano; Carlo Asteggiano; Eduardo Caverzasi; Maria Luisa Mandelli; Michael Lauricella; Nicole Yabut; Matthew Neylan; Gina Kirkish; Maria Luisa Gorno-Tempini; Roland G Henry Journal: J Neuroimaging Date: 2020-07-08 Impact factor: 2.486
Authors: J P Klein; A Arora; M Neema; B C Healy; S Tauhid; D Goldberg-Zimring; C Chavarro-Nieto; J M Stankiewicz; A B Cohen; G J Buckle; M K Houtchens; A Ceccarelli; E Dell'Oglio; C R G Guttmann; D C Alsop; D B Hackney; R Bakshi Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2011-04-28 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Nico Papinutto; Regina Schlaeger; Valentina Panara; Eduardo Caverzasi; Sinyeob Ahn; Kevin J Johnson; Alyssa H Zhu; William A Stern; Gerhard Laub; Stephen L Hauser; Roland G Henry Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2014-12-08 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Mark A Horsfield; Stefania Sala; Mohit Neema; Martina Absinta; Anshika Bakshi; Maria Pia Sormani; Maria A Rocca; Rohit Bakshi; Massimo Filippi Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2010-01-07 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Jiwon Oh; Michaela Seigo; Shiv Saidha; Elias Sotirchos; Kathy Zackowski; Min Chen; Jerry Prince; Marie Diener-West; Peter A Calabresi; Daniel S Reich Journal: J Neuroimaging Date: 2014-03-05 Impact factor: 2.486
Authors: Patrick A B Freund; Catherine Dalton; Claudia A M Wheeler-Kingshott; Janice Glensman; David Bradbury; Alan J Thompson; Nikolaus Weiskopf Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2010-11 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Thomas Sartoretti; Robert P Ganley; Ruiqing Ni; Patrick Freund; Hanns Ulrich Zeilhofer; Jan Klohs Journal: Front Aging Neurosci Date: 2022-05-02 Impact factor: 5.750