BACKGROUND: Adherence to first course treatment guidelines for breast cancer may not be uniform across racial/ethnic groups and could be a major contributing factor to disparities in outcome. In this population-based study, we assessed racial differences in initial treatment of breast cancer. METHODS: Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program data were used to study all primary invasive breast cancers diagnosed during 2000-2001 among Black (n = 877) and White (n = 2437) female residents of the five Atlanta SEER counties, counties with several large teaching hospitals. Differences in treatment delay, cancer directed surgery, and receipt of chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or hormonal therapy were analyzed according to guidelines for treatment. Analyses utilized frequency distributions, chi(2) tests of independence and statistics in and across strata. RESULTS: Black women experienced longer treatment delays, regardless of stage at diagnosis, and were 4-5 fold more likely to experience delays greater than 60 days (P < 0.001). For local-regional disease, more Black women did not receive cancer directed surgery (7.5% vs. 1.5% of white women, P < 0.001), but did receive breast conserving surgery (BCS) equivalently. Only 61% of Black vs. 72% of White women received radiation with BCS (P < 0.001). Black women eligible for hormonal therapy were less likely to receive it (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest treatment standards are not adequately or equivalently met among Black and White women, even in an area where teaching hospitals provide a substantial portion of breast cancer care. Treatment differences can adversely affect outcome and reasons for the differences need to be addressed.
BACKGROUND: Adherence to first course treatment guidelines for breast cancer may not be uniform across racial/ethnic groups and could be a major contributing factor to disparities in outcome. In this population-based study, we assessed racial differences in initial treatment of breast cancer. METHODS: Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program data were used to study all primary invasive breast cancers diagnosed during 2000-2001 among Black (n = 877) and White (n = 2437) female residents of the five Atlanta SEER counties, counties with several large teaching hospitals. Differences in treatment delay, cancer directed surgery, and receipt of chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or hormonal therapy were analyzed according to guidelines for treatment. Analyses utilized frequency distributions, chi(2) tests of independence and statistics in and across strata. RESULTS: Black women experienced longer treatment delays, regardless of stage at diagnosis, and were 4-5 fold more likely to experience delays greater than 60 days (P < 0.001). For local-regional disease, more Black women did not receive cancer directed surgery (7.5% vs. 1.5% of white women, P < 0.001), but did receive breast conserving surgery (BCS) equivalently. Only 61% of Black vs. 72% of White women received radiation with BCS (P < 0.001). Black women eligible for hormonal therapy were less likely to receive it (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest treatment standards are not adequately or equivalently met among Black and White women, even in an area where teaching hospitals provide a substantial portion of breast cancer care. Treatment differences can adversely affect outcome and reasons for the differences need to be addressed.
Authors: Kerryn W Reding; Christopher S Carlson; Orsalem Kahsai; Christina C Chen; Andrew McDavid; David R Doody; Chu Chen; India Ornelas; Kimberly Lowe; Leslie Bernstein; Linda Weiss; Jill A McDonald; Michael S Simon; Brian Strom; Polly A Marchbanks; Ronald Burkman; Robert Spirtas; Jonathan M Liff; Kathleen E Malone Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2012-05-31 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Joseph Lipscomb; Theresa W Gillespie; Michael Goodman; Lisa C Richardson; Lori A Pollack; A Blythe Ryerson; Kevin C Ward Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2012-01-26 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Kevin M Gorey; Isaac N Luginaah; Kendra L Schwartz; Karen Y Fung; Madhan Balagurusamy; Emma Bartfay; Frances C Wright; Uzoamaka Anucha; Renee R Parsons Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2008-03-11 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Natalie Liu; Daniela Molena; Miloslawa Stem; Amanda L Blackford; David B Sewell; Anne O Lidor Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2018-02-05 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Kevin M Gorey; Isaac N Luginaah; Emma Bartfay; Karen Y Fung; Eric J Holowaty; Frances C Wright; Caroline Hamm; Sindu M Kanjeekal Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2010-03-18 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Helen Swede; David I Gregorio; Susan H Tannenbaum; Jessica A Brockmeyer; Christine Ambrosone; Lori L Wilson; Mellisa A Pensa; Lou Gonsalves; Richard G Stevens; Carolyn D Runowicz Journal: Clin Breast Cancer Date: 2011-05-12 Impact factor: 3.225
Authors: Jacqueline W Miller; Judith Lee Smith; A Blythe Ryerson; Thomas C Tucker; Claudia Allemani Journal: Cancer Date: 2017-12-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Karen E Callahan; Paulo S Pinheiro; Nevena Cvijetic; Rachel E Kelly; Carmen P Ponce; Erin N Kobetz Journal: J Immigr Minor Health Date: 2017-12
Authors: Gery P Guy; Joseph Lipscomb; Theresa W Gillespie; Michael Goodman; Lisa C Richardson; Kevin C Ward Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2014-12-10 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Vanessa B Sheppard; Claudine Isaacs; George Luta; Shawna C Willey; Marc Boisvert; Felicity W K Harper; Karen Smith; Sara Horton; Minetta C Liu; Yvonne Jennings; Fikru Hirpa; Felicia Snead; Jeanne S Mandelblatt Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2013-04-16 Impact factor: 4.872