Literature DB >> 17658273

Power and sample size calculation for neuroimaging studies by non-central random field theory.

Satoru Hayasaka1, Ann M Peiffer, Christina E Hugenschmidt, Paul J Laurienti.   

Abstract

Determining power and sample size in neuroimaging studies is a challenging task because of the massive multiple comparisons among tens of thousands of correlated voxels. To facilitate this task, we propose a power analysis method based on random field theory (RFT) by modeling signal areas within images as non-central random field. With this framework, power can be calculated for specific areas of anticipated signals within the brain while accounting for the 3D nature of signals. This framework can also be extended to visualize local variability in sensitivity as a power map and a sample size map. We validated our non-central RFT framework based on Monte-Carlo simulations. Moreover, we applied our method to a blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data set with a small sample size in order to demonstrate its use in study planning. From the simulations, we found that our method was able to estimate power quite accurately. In the fMRI data analysis, despite the small sample size, we were able to determine power and the number of subjects required to detect signals.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17658273      PMCID: PMC2041809          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.06.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  20 in total

1.  Global, voxel, and cluster tests, by theory and permutation, for a difference between two groups of structural MR images of the brain.

Authors:  E T Bullmore; J Suckling; S Overmeyer; S Rabe-Hesketh; E Taylor; M J Brammer
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Precentral gyrus discrepancy in electronic versions of the Talairach atlas.

Authors:  Joseph A Maldjian; Paul J Laurienti; Jonathan H Burdette
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Validating cluster size inference: random field and permutation methods.

Authors:  Satoru Hayasaka; Thomas E Nichols
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  An automated method for neuroanatomic and cytoarchitectonic atlas-based interrogation of fMRI data sets.

Authors:  Joseph A Maldjian; Paul J Laurienti; Robert A Kraft; Jonathan H Burdette
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Estimating sample size in functional MRI (fMRI) neuroimaging studies: statistical power analyses.

Authors:  John E Desmond; Gary H Glover
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2002-08-30       Impact factor: 2.390

6.  An empirical investigation into the number of subjects required for an event-related fMRI study.

Authors:  Kevin Murphy; Hugh Garavan
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  A unified statistical approach for determining significant signals in images of cerebral activation.

Authors:  K J Worsley; S Marrett; P Neelin; A C Vandal; K J Friston; A C Evans
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  An improved theoretical P value for SPMs based on discrete local maxima.

Authors:  K J Worsley
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-08-25       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Mapping voxel-based statistical power on parametric images.

Authors:  J D Van Horn; T M Ellmore; G Esposito; K F Berman
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 10.  Nonparametric analysis of statistic images from functional mapping experiments.

Authors:  A P Holmes; R C Blair; J D Watson; I Ford
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 6.200

View more
  21 in total

1.  A power calculation guide for fMRI studies.

Authors:  Jeanette A Mumford
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-28       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Development of PowerMap: a software package for statistical power calculation in neuroimaging studies.

Authors:  Karen E Joyce; Satoru Hayasaka
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2012-10

3.  Cerebral mechanism of puncturing at He-Mu point combination for functional dyspepsia: study protocol for a randomized controlled parallel trial.

Authors:  Shuai Yin; Yuan Chen; Du Lei; Rui-Rui Sun; Ting-Ting Ma; Pei-Min Feng; Zhao-Xuan He; Xue-Ling Suo; Pei-Hong Ma; Yu-Zhu Qu; Ke Qiu; Miao-Miao Jing; Qi-Yong Gong; Fan-Rong Liang; Jiao Chen; Fang Zeng
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 5.135

4.  Age-related changes in the functional neuroanatomy of overt speech production.

Authors:  Peter Sörös; Arpita Bose; Lisa Guttman Sokoloff; Simon J Graham; Donald T Stuss
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 4.673

5.  Role of DHEA and cortisol in prefrontal-amygdalar development and working memory.

Authors:  Nasr A I Farooqi; Martina Scotti; Ji Min Lew; Kelly N Botteron; Sherif Karama; James T McCracken; Tuong-Vi Nguyen
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 4.905

6.  Unified framework for robust estimation of brain networks from FMRI using temporal and spatial correlation analyses.

Authors:  Yongmei Michelle Wang; Jing Xia
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  Divergent effects of genetic variation in endocannabinoid signaling on human threat- and reward-related brain function.

Authors:  Ahmad R Hariri; Adam Gorka; Luke W Hyde; Mark Kimak; Indrani Halder; Francesca Ducci; Robert E Ferrell; David Goldman; Stephen B Manuck
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2008-12-21       Impact factor: 13.382

8.  Power calculations for multicenter imaging studies controlled by the false discovery rate.

Authors:  John Suckling; Anna Barnes; Dominic Job; David Brenan; Katherine Lymer; Paola Dazzan; Tiago Reis Marques; Clare MacKay; Shane McKie; Steve R Williams; Steven C R Williams; Stephen Lawrie; Bill Deakin
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Improved Statistical Power with a Sparse Shape Model in Detecting an Aging Effect in the Hippocampus and Amygdala.

Authors:  Moo K Chung; Seung-Goo Kim; Stacey M Schaefer; Carien M van Reekum; Lara Peschke-Schmitz; Matthew J Sutterer; Richard J Davidson
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2014-03-21

10.  Effects of Chaihu-Shugan-San capsule for psychogenic erectile dysfunction: Study protocol of a randomized placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Feiqiang Ren; Ziyang Ma; Yifeng Shen; Guangsen Li; Yaodong You; Xujun Yu; Zhengjie Li; Degui Chang; Peihai Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.