Literature DB >> 17655907

The relationship between the subjective and objective aspects of visual filling-in.

Uri Polat1, Dov Sagi.   

Abstract

We explored the relationship between filling-in processes and the known increase in detection sensitivity observed for targets presented between collinear flankers. Filling-in was probed using a Yes/No detection task by measuring the false-positive reports (false-alarm, FA) and hit rate (Hit) for a low-contrast Gabor target with different target-flankers distances. Observers increased the number of reports on the presence of a target (FA and Hit) when the flankers' distance was within the known range of facilitatory lateral interactions. This bias in reporting was reduced with blocked stimulation, when the target-flanker distance was kept fixed across trials. When different distances were mixed by trials the bias followed the pattern of lateral interactions across distance. The effect was maximal when flankers and targets were aligned. These false perceptions are most likely the result of a filling-in process by lateral excitation that produces illusory contours.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17655907     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.06.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  12 in total

1.  No conflict control in the absence of awareness.

Authors:  Ulrich Ansorge; Isabella Fuchs; Shah Khalid; Wilfried Kunde
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-11-04

2.  Is interpolation cognitively encapsulated? Measuring the effects of belief on Kanizsa shape discrimination and illusory contour formation.

Authors:  Brian P Keane; Hongjing Lu; Thomas V Papathomas; Steven M Silverstein; Philip J Kellman
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2012-03-20

3.  Cortical Interactions between Prosthetic and Natural Vision.

Authors:  Tamar Arens-Arad; Nairouz Farah; Rivkah Lender; Avital Moshkovitz; Thomas Flores; Daniel Palanker; Yossi Mandel
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Suppressive lateral interactions at parafoveal representations in primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Arezoo Pooresmaeili; Jose L Herrero; Matthew W Self; Pieter R Roelfsema; Alexander Thiele
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Collinear facilitation and contour integration in autism: evidence for atypical visual integration.

Authors:  Stephen Jachim; Paul A Warren; Niall McLoughlin; Emma Gowen
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Noise and the Perceptual Filling-in effect.

Authors:  Ativ Zomet; Uri Polat; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Collinear stimuli induce local and cross-areal coherence in the visual cortex of behaving monkeys.

Authors:  Ariel Gilad; Elhanan Meirovithz; Amir Leshem; Amos Arieli; Hamutal Slovin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Filling-in and suppression of visual perception from context: a Bayesian account of perceptual biases by contextual influences.

Authors:  Li Zhaoping; Li Jingling
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Uncovering foveal crowding?

Authors:  Maria Lev; Oren Yehezkel; Uri Polat
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Rats and humans differ in processing collinear visual features.

Authors:  Philip M Meier; Pamela Reinagel
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 3.492

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.