BACKGROUND: Chromosome 8q24 is a region of compelling interest for prostate cancer (PRCA). Linkage, association, and admixture analysis initially indicated the region. Subsequently, several variants at 8q24 have been found to independently associate with PRCA. One compelling hypothesis is allelic heterogeneity, whereby multiple variants affect the regulation of the same gene. In addition to potential allelic heterogeneity, 8q24 exhibits strong linkage disequilibrium over vast distances and is prone to chromosomal aberrations. METHODS: Allelic heterogeneity and complex chromosomal structure are factors that hinder progress towards gene identification using association. Linkage techniques, however, are robust to allelic heterogeneity and therefore can contribute important localization information. We have used a linkage-based localization technique to perform recombinant mapping in eight high-risk Utah pedigrees. RESULTS: Using pedigree-based recombinant mapping we identify a 5.7 Mb region at 8q24.21-22, between markers D8S1774 and D8S557. Considering our region with the localization previously presented, we can delimit the 8q24 PRCA locus to a 2.0 Mb consensus interval from 127.5 to 129.5 Mb. CONCLUSION: We have used a linkage-based, recombinant mapping technique in extended high-risk Utah pedigrees to successfully narrow the 8q24 PRCA locus. The region we present halves the 95% credible interval previously described using admixture analysis and contains only three annotated genes: FAM84B, MYC, and TMEM75. It should be noted that LD stretches far beyond the interval we describe, and hence this region adds important information about where to focus future efforts to isolate the causal variants and underlying gene, whether by linkage or association techniques. 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc
BACKGROUND: Chromosome 8q24 is a region of compelling interest for prostate cancer (PRCA). Linkage, association, and admixture analysis initially indicated the region. Subsequently, several variants at 8q24 have been found to independently associate with PRCA. One compelling hypothesis is allelic heterogeneity, whereby multiple variants affect the regulation of the same gene. In addition to potential allelic heterogeneity, 8q24 exhibits strong linkage disequilibrium over vast distances and is prone to chromosomal aberrations. METHODS: Allelic heterogeneity and complex chromosomal structure are factors that hinder progress towards gene identification using association. Linkage techniques, however, are robust to allelic heterogeneity and therefore can contribute important localization information. We have used a linkage-based localization technique to perform recombinant mapping in eight high-risk Utah pedigrees. RESULTS: Using pedigree-based recombinant mapping we identify a 5.7 Mb region at 8q24.21-22, between markers D8S1774 and D8S557. Considering our region with the localization previously presented, we can delimit the 8q24 PRCA locus to a 2.0 Mb consensus interval from 127.5 to 129.5 Mb. CONCLUSION: We have used a linkage-based, recombinant mapping technique in extended high-risk Utah pedigrees to successfully narrow the 8q24 PRCA locus. The region we present halves the 95% credible interval previously described using admixture analysis and contains only three annotated genes: FAM84B, MYC, and TMEM75. It should be noted that LD stretches far beyond the interval we describe, and hence this region adds important information about where to focus future efforts to isolate the causal variants and underlying gene, whether by linkage or association techniques. 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc
Authors: Scott L DuVall; Alison M Fraser; Kerry Rowe; Alun Thomas; Geraldine P Mineau Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2011-09-16 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Claire L Simpson; Cheryl D Cropp; Tiina Wahlfors; Asha George; Marypat S Jones; Ursula Harper; Damaris Ponciano-Jackson; Teuvo Tammela; Johanna Schleutker; Joan E Bailey-Wilson Journal: Eur J Hum Genet Date: 2012-09-05 Impact factor: 4.246
Authors: Joke Beuten; Jonathan A L Gelfond; Margarita L Martinez-Fierro; Korri S Weldon; AnaLisa C Crandall; Augusto Rojas-Martinez; Ian M Thompson; Robin J Leach Journal: Carcinogenesis Date: 2009-06-15 Impact factor: 4.944
Authors: Lingyi Lu; Geraldine Cancel-Tassin; Antoine Valeri; Olivier Cussenot; Ethan M Lange; Kathleen A Cooney; James M Farnham; Nicola J Camp; Lisa A Cannon-Albright; Teuvo L J Tammela; Johanna Schleutker; Josef Hoegel; Kathleen Herkommer; Christiane Maier; Walther Vogel; Fredrik Wiklund; Monica Emanuelsson; Henrik Grönberg; Kathleen E Wiley; Sarah D Isaacs; Patrick C Walsh; Brian T Helfand; Donghui Kan; William J Catalona; Janet L Stanford; Liesel M FitzGerald; Bo Johanneson; Kerry Deutsch; Laura McIntosh; Elaine A Ostrander; Stephen N Thibodeau; Shannon K McDonnell; Scott Hebbring; Daniel J Schaid; Alice S Whittemore; Ingrid Oakley-Girvan; Chih-Lin Hsieh; Isaac Powell; Joan E Bailey-Wilson; Cheryl D Cropp; Claire Simpson; John D Carpten; Daniela Seminara; S Lilly Zheng; Jianfen Xu; Graham G Giles; Gianluca Severi; John L Hopper; Dallas R English; William D Foulkes; Lovise Maehle; Pal Moller; Michael D Badzioch; Steve Edwards; Michelle Guy; Ros Eeles; Douglas Easton; William B Isaacs Journal: Prostate Date: 2011-07-11 Impact factor: 4.104
Authors: Meredith Yeager; Nianqing Xiao; Richard B Hayes; Pascal Bouffard; Brian Desany; Laura Burdett; Nick Orr; Casey Matthews; Liqun Qi; Andrew Crenshaw; Zdenek Markovic; Karin M Fredrikson; Kevin B Jacobs; Laufey Amundadottir; Thomas P Jarvie; David J Hunter; Robert Hoover; Gilles Thomas; Timothy T Harkins; Stephen J Chanock Journal: Hum Genet Date: 2008-08-14 Impact factor: 4.132