Literature DB >> 17651153

Children with peanut allergy recognize predominantly Ara h2 and Ara h6, which remains stable over time.

A E Flinterman1, E van Hoffen, C F den Hartog Jager, S Koppelman, S G Pasmans, M O Hoekstra, C A Bruijnzeel-Koomen, A C Knulst, E F Knol.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In peanut-allergic adults, IgE is mainly directed to Ara h1 and Ara h2. More recently, a role for Ara h6 has been suggested. In contrast to adults, IgE in children can fluctuate over time. Therefore, children may have a more dynamic reactivity to peanut.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the IgE reactivity to major peanut allergens in peanut-allergic children at two subsequent time-points.
METHODS: Twenty children (3-15 years old) with peanut allergy, confirmed by a double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC), were included. Just before and 20 months after DBPCFC, IgE reactivity to purified Ara h1, Ara h2, Ara h3 and Ara h6 was studied by immunoblots and skin prick tests (SPTs).
RESULTS: Before DBPCFC, all peanut-allergic children showed IgE reactivity to Ara h2; Ara h6 was recognized by 16 children, and Ara h1 and Ara h3 by 10 children. After 20 months, peanut-specific IgE levels (median 23 kU/L) and the individual recognition of major allergens were comparable with the levels and recognition before challenge (median 28.2 kU/L). SPT with Ara h2 and Ara h6 was positive in most children, whereas SPT with Ara h1 and Ara h3 was positive in approximately half of the children. Ara h6 induced the largest weals. None of the parameters were related to the severity of peanut allergy.
CONCLUSION: Ara h2 and Ara h6 are the most frequently recognized major peanut allergens in children. The individual reactivity to the major peanut allergens remained stable over time, despite DBPCFC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17651153     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2007.02764.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Allergy        ISSN: 0954-7894            Impact factor:   5.018


  32 in total

1.  Smartphone instrument for portable enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays.

Authors:  Kenneth D Long; Hojeong Yu; Brian T Cunningham
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Variable IgE cross-reactivity between peanut 2S-albumins: The case for measuring IgE to both Ara h 2 and Ara h 6.

Authors:  Stéphane Hazebrouck; Blanche Guillon; Evelyne Paty; Stephen C Dreskin; Karine Adel-Patient; Hervé Bernard
Journal:  Clin Exp Allergy       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 5.018

3.  Ara h 2: crystal structure and IgE binding distinguish two subpopulations of peanut allergic patients by epitope diversity.

Authors:  G A Mueller; R A Gosavi; A Pomés; S Wünschmann; A F Moon; R E London; L C Pedersen
Journal:  Allergy       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 13.146

4.  Ara h 6 complements Ara h 2 as an important marker for IgE reactivity to peanut.

Authors:  Audrey E Koid; Martin D Chapman; Robert G Hamilton; Ronald van Ree; Serge A Versteeg; Stephen C Dreskin; Stef J Koppelman; Sabina Wünschmann
Journal:  J Agric Food Chem       Date:  2013-12-26       Impact factor: 5.279

5.  IgE, but not IgG4, antibodies to Ara h 2 distinguish peanut allergy from asymptomatic peanut sensitization.

Authors:  X Hong; D Caruso; R Kumar; R Liu; X Liu; G Wang; J A Pongracic; X Wang
Journal:  Allergy       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 13.146

6.  Ara h 2 and Ara h 6 have similar allergenic activity and are substantially redundant.

Authors:  Xueni Chen; Qian Wang; Rabab El-Mezayen; Yonghua Zhuang; Stephen C Dreskin
Journal:  Int Arch Allergy Immunol       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 2.749

7.  Epitope analysis of Ara h 2 and Ara h 6: characteristic patterns of IgE-binding fingerprints among individuals with similar clinical histories.

Authors:  K Otsu; R Guo; S C Dreskin
Journal:  Clin Exp Allergy       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 5.018

8.  Effector activity of peanut allergens: a critical role for Ara h 2, Ara h 6, and their variants.

Authors:  H S Porterfield; K S Murray; D G Schlichting; X Chen; K C Hansen; M W Duncan; S C Dreskin
Journal:  Clin Exp Allergy       Date:  2009-05-11       Impact factor: 5.018

Review 9.  Common methodologies in the evaluation of food allergy: pitfalls and prospects of food allergy prevalence studies.

Authors:  Shang-an Shu; Christopher Chang; Patrick S C Leung
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 8.667

10.  An unfolded variant of the major peanut allergen Ara h 2 with decreased anaphylactic potential.

Authors:  P Starkl; F Felix; D Krishnamurthy; C Stremnitzer; F Roth-Walter; S R Prickett; A L Voskamp; A Willensdorfer; K Szalai; M Weichselbaumer; R E O'Hehir; E Jensen-Jarolim
Journal:  Clin Exp Allergy       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 5.018

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.