Literature DB >> 17650574

Preferences for partner notification method: variation in responses between respondents as index patients and contacts.

A Apoola1, K W Radcliffe, S Das, V Robshaw, G Gilleran, B S Kumari, M Boothby, R Rajakumar.   

Abstract

There have been very few studies focusing on what form of communication patients would find acceptable from a clinic. This study looks at the differences in preferences for various partner notification methods when the respondents were index patients compared with when they had to be contacted because a partner had a sexually transmitted infection (STI). There were 2544 respondents. When the clinic had to notify partners, respondents were more likely to report the method as good when a partner had an STI and they were being contacted compared with when the respondents had an infection and the partner was being contacted. The opposite was true for patient referral partner notification. Therefore, there are variations in the preferences of respondents for partner notification method, which depend on whether they see themselves as index patients or contacts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17650574     DOI: 10.1258/095646207781147238

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J STD AIDS        ISSN: 0956-4624            Impact factor:   1.359


  6 in total

1.  Telling partners about chlamydia: how acceptable are the new technologies?

Authors:  Carol A Hopkins; Meredith J Temple-Smith; Christopher K Fairley; Natasha L Pavlin; Jane E Tomnay; Rhian M Parker; Frank J Bowden; Darren B Russell; Jane S Hocking; Marcus Y Chen
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 3.090

2.  Public health opportunities and challenges in the provision of partner notification services: the New England experience.

Authors:  Sarah Magaziner; Madeline C Montgomery; Thomas Bertrand; Daniel Daltry; Heidi Jenkins; Brenda Kendall; Lauren Molotnikov; Lindsay Pierce; Emer Smith; Lynn Sosa; Jacob J van den Berg; Theodore Marak; Don Operario; Philip A Chan
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  Perspectives on voluntary assisted partner notification among providers, people with HIV and the general population in Indonesia: a formative qualitative study.

Authors:  Gede Benny Setia Wirawan; Pande Putu Januraga; I Gusti Agung Agus Mahendra; Ngakan Putu Anom Harjana; Tiara Mahatmi; Lanny Luhukay; Bharat Bhushan Rewari; Cheryl Johnson; David A Katz
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-01-30       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Current practices of partner notification among MSM with HIV, gonorrhoea and syphilis in the Netherlands: an urgent need for improvement.

Authors:  Fleur van Aar; Imke Schreuder; Yolanda van Weert; Ralph Spijker; Hannelore Götz; Eline Op de Coul
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 3.090

Review 5.  Unnamed Partners From Syphilis Partner Services Interviews, 7 Jurisdictions.

Authors:  Anna Barry Cope; Kyle Bernstein; James Matthias; Mohammad Rahman; Jill Diesel; River A Pugsley; Julia A Schillinger; Rilene A Chew Ng; Darpun Sachdev; Rebecca Shaw; Trang Quyen Nguyen; Ellen J Klingler; Victoria L Mobley; Erika Samoff; Thomas A Peterman
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 3.868

6.  Anticipated Notification of Sexual Partners following STD Diagnosis among Men Who Have Sex with Men and Transgender Women in Lima, Peru: A Mixed Methods Analysis.

Authors:  Jesse L Clark; Amaya G Perez-Brumer; Eddy R Segura; Hector J Salvatierra; Jorge Sanchez; Javier R Lama
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.