BACKGROUND: Reducing transmission depends on the percentage of infected partners treated; if many are missed, impact on transmission will be low. Traditional partner services metrics evaluate the number of partners found and treated. We estimated the proportion of partners of syphilis patients not locatable for intervention. METHODS: We reviewed records of early syphilis cases (primary, secondary, early latent) reported in 2015 to 2017 in 7 jurisdictions (Florida, Louisiana, Michigan, North Carolina, Virginia, New York City, and San Francisco). Among interviewed syphilis patients, we determined the proportion who reported named partners (with locating information), reported unnamed partners (no locating information), and did not report partners. For patients with no reported partners, we estimated their range of unreported partners to be between one and the average number of partners for patients who reported partners. RESULTS: Among 29,719 syphilis patients, 23,613 (80%) were interviewed and 18,581 (63%) reported 84,224 sex partners (average, 4.5; 20,853 [25%] named and 63,371 [75%] unnamed). An estimated 11,138 to 54,521 partners were unreported. Thus, 74,509 to 117,892 (of 95,362-138,745) partners were not reached by partner services (78%-85%). Among interviewed patients, 71% reported ≥1 unnamed partner or reported no partners; this proportion was higher for men who reported sex with men (75%) compared with men who reported sex with women only (65%) and women (44%). CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 80% of sex partners were either unnamed or unreported. Partner services may be less successful at interrupting transmission in networks for men who reported sex with men where a higher proportion of partners are unnamed or unreported.
BACKGROUND: Reducing transmission depends on the percentage of infected partners treated; if many are missed, impact on transmission will be low. Traditional partner services metrics evaluate the number of partners found and treated. We estimated the proportion of partners of syphilis patients not locatable for intervention. METHODS: We reviewed records of early syphilis cases (primary, secondary, early latent) reported in 2015 to 2017 in 7 jurisdictions (Florida, Louisiana, Michigan, North Carolina, Virginia, New York City, and San Francisco). Among interviewed syphilis patients, we determined the proportion who reported named partners (with locating information), reported unnamed partners (no locating information), and did not report partners. For patients with no reported partners, we estimated their range of unreported partners to be between one and the average number of partners for patients who reported partners. RESULTS: Among 29,719 syphilis patients, 23,613 (80%) were interviewed and 18,581 (63%) reported 84,224 sex partners (average, 4.5; 20,853 [25%] named and 63,371 [75%] unnamed). An estimated 11,138 to 54,521 partners were unreported. Thus, 74,509 to 117,892 (of 95,362-138,745) partners were not reached by partner services (78%-85%). Among interviewed patients, 71% reported ≥1 unnamed partner or reported no partners; this proportion was higher for men who reported sex with men (75%) compared with men who reported sex with women only (65%) and women (44%). CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 80% of sex partners were either unnamed or unreported. Partner services may be less successful at interrupting transmission in networks for men who reported sex with men where a higher proportion of partners are unnamed or unreported.
Authors: Melissa Pennise; Roxana Inscho; Kate Herpin; John Owens; Brenden A Bedard; Anita C Weimer; Byron S Kennedy; Mary Younge Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2015 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Anna B Cope; Victoria L Mobley; Erika Samoff; Kevin O'Connor; Thomas A Peterman Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2018-11-30 Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Tigran Avoundjian; James Stewart; David Peyton; Christie Lewis; Kendra Johnson; Sara N Glick; Matthew R Golden; Christine M Khosropour Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2019-04 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Matthew J Mimiaga; Sari L Reisner; Ashley M Tetu; Katherine E Bonafide; Kevin Cranston; Thomas Bertrand; David S Novak; Kenneth H Mayer Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2009 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Parya Saberi; Torsten B Neilands; Michelle A Lally; Sybil G Hosek; Lisa Hightow-Weidman Journal: J Int Assoc Provid AIDS Care Date: 2019 Jan-Dec
Authors: Anna Barry Cope; Kyle T Bernstein; James Matthias; Mohammad Rahman; Jill C Diesel; River A Pugsley; Julia A Schillinger; Rilene A Chew Ng; Ellen J Klingler; Victoria L Mobley; Erika Samoff; Thomas A Peterman Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2022-02-01 Impact factor: 3.868