Literature DB >> 17646991

Magnetic resonance angiographic assessment of upper extremity vessels prior to vascular access surgery: feasibility and accuracy.

Nils R Planken1, Jan H Tordoir, Lucien E Duijm, Harrie C van den Bosch, Frank M van der Sande, Jeroen P Kooman, Michiel W de Haan, Tim Leiner.   

Abstract

A contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) protocol for selective imaging of the entire upper extremity arterial and venous tree in a single exam has been developed. Twenty-five end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients underwent CE-MRA and duplex ultrasonography (DUS) of the upper extremity prior to hemodialysis vascular access creation. Accuracy of CE-MRA arterial and venous diameter measurements were compared with DUS and intraoperative (IO) diameter measurements, the standard of reference. Upper extremity vasculature depiction was feasible with CE-MRA. CE-MRA forearm and upper arm arterial diameters were 2.94 +/- 0.67 mm and 4.05 +/- 0.84 mm, respectively. DUS arterial diameters were 2.80 +/- 0.48 mm and 4.38 +/- 1.24 mm; IO diameters were 3.00 +/- 0.35 mm and 3.55 +/- 0.51 mm. Forearm arterial diameters were accurately determined with both techniques. Both techniques overestimated upper arm arterial diameters significantly. Venous diameters were accurately determined with CE-MRA but not with DUS (forearm: CE-MRA: 2.64 +/- 0.61 mm; DUS: 2.50 +/- 0.44 mm, and IO: 3.40 +/- 0.22 mm; upper arm: CE-MRA: 4.09 +/- 0.71 mm; DUS: 3.02 +/- 1.65 mm, and IO: 4.30 +/- 0.78 mm). CE-MRA enables selective imaging of upper extremity vasculature in patients requiring hemodialysis access. Forearm arterial diameters can be assessed accurately by CE-MRA. Both CE-MRA and DUS slightly overestimate upper arm arterial diameters. In comparison to DUS, CE-MRA enables a more accurate determination of upper extremity venous diameters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17646991     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-007-0714-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  47 in total

Review 1.  Direct contrast-enhanced 3D MR venography.

Authors:  S G Ruehm; K Zimny; J F Debatin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Magnetic resonance angiography of the peripheral arteries: current status.

Authors:  James F M Meaney
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2002-12-20       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  MR venography needs to know where it stands for vascular mapping prior to fistula creation.

Authors:  Ismail Mihmanli; Fatih Kantarci
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-08-20       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Prospective validation of an algorithm to maximize native arteriovenous fistulae for chronic hemodialysis access.

Authors:  Thomas S Huber; C Keith Ozaki; Timothy C Flynn; W Anthony Lee; Scott A Berceli; Christa M Hirneise; Lori M Carlton; Jeffrey W Carter; Edward A Ross; James M Seeger
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 5.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the aorta and branch vessels.

Authors:  V B Ho; M R Prince; Q Dong
Journal:  Coron Artery Dis       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 1.439

6.  Three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR venographic evaluation of patency of central veins in the thorax: initial experience.

Authors:  T S Shinde; V S Lee; N M Rofsky; G A Krinsky; J C Weinreb
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  [Contrast-enhanced 3D MR venography of central thoracic veins: preliminary experience].

Authors:  M Goyen; J Barkhausen; H Kuehl; S C Goehde; K Kröger; S Bosk; J F Debatin; S G Ruehm
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2001-04

Review 8.  Increasing arteriovenous fistulas in hemodialysis patients: problems and solutions.

Authors:  Michael Allon; Michelle L Robbin
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 10.612

9.  Prediction of wrist arteriovenous fistula maturation with preoperative vein mapping with ultrasonography.

Authors:  Robert R Mendes; Mark A Farber; William A Marston; Lesley C Dinwiddie; Blair A Keagy; Steven J Burnham
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.268

10.  Limitations of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound-directed (duplex) scanning in the diagnosis of subclavian vein thrombosis.

Authors:  W D Haire; T G Lynch; G B Lund; R P Lieberman; J A Edney
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 4.268

View more
  3 in total

1.  Non-contrast MRI methods as a tool for the pre-operative assessment and surveillance of the arterio-venous fistula for haemodialysis.

Authors:  Conor J MacDonald; Stephen Gandy; Eilidh C M Avison; Shona Matthew; Rose Ross; John G Houston
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 2.  Imaging in Vascular Access.

Authors:  Eoin A Murphy; Rose A Ross; Robert G Jones; Stephen J Gandy; Nicolas Aristokleous; Marco Salsano; Jonathan R Weir-McCall; Shona Matthew; John Graeme Houston
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 2.495

3.  Experimental Assessment of Two Non-Contrast MRI Sequences Used for Computational Fluid Dynamics: Investigation of Consistency Between Techniques.

Authors:  C J MacDonald; R Hellmuth; L Priba; E Murphy; S Gandy; S Matthew; R Ross; J G Houston
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 2.495

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.