Literature DB >> 17646493

A double-blind, crossover assessment of the sedative and analgesic effects of intranasal dexmedetomidine.

Vivian M Yuen1, Michael G Irwin, Theresa W Hui, Man K Yuen, Libby H Y Lee.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The alpha2-receptor agonist, dexmedetomidine, provides sedation with facilitated arousal and analgesia with no respiratory depression. These properties render it potentially useful for anesthesia premedication, although parenteral administration is not practical in this setting. We designed this study to evaluate the sedative, anxiolytic, analgesic, and hemodynamic effects of dexmedetomidine administered intranasally in healthy volunteers.
METHODS: Koch's design for crossover trials (three-treatment and two-period design) was adopted. The study was double-blind and there were three treatment groups: A (placebo), B (intranasal dexmedetomidine 1 microg/kg) and C (intranasal dexmedetomidine 1.5 microg/kg). Each of the 18 subjects participated in two study periods. The study drug was administered intranasally after baseline observations of modified Observer Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale, visual analog scale of sedation, bispectral index, visual analog scale of anxiety, pain pressure threshold measured by an electronic algometer, systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, and oxygen saturation. These were repeated during the course of the study.
RESULTS: Intranasal dexmedetomidine was well tolerated. Both 1 and 1.5 microg/kg doses equally produced significant sedation and decreases in bispectral index, SBP, diastolic blood pressure, and heart rate when compared with placebo (P < 0.05). The onset of sedation occurred at 45 min with a peak effect at 90-150 min. The maximum reduction in SBP was 6%, 23%, and 21% for Groups A, B, and C respectively. There was no effect on pain pressure threshold, oxygen saturation or respiratory rate. Anxiolysis could not be evaluated as no subjects were anxious at baseline.
CONCLUSION: The intranasal route is effective, well tolerated, and convenient for the administration of dexmedetomidine. Future studies are required to evaluate the possible role of the noninvasive route of administration of dexmedetomidine in various clinical settings, including its role as premedication prior to induction of anesthesia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17646493     DOI: 10.1213/01.ane.0000269488.06546.7c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  40 in total

1.  Buccal administration of dexmedetomidine as a preanesthetic in children.

Authors:  Yoshio Sakurai; Toru Obata; Akio Odaka; Katsuo Terui; Masanori Tamura; Hideki Miyao
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  A Comparison of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine and Dexmedetomidine Plus Buccal Midazolam for Non-painful Procedural Sedation in Children with Autism.

Authors:  Bi Lian Li; Vivian Man-Ying Yuen; Na Zhang; Huan Huan Zhang; Jun Xiang Huang; Si Yuan Yang; Jeffery W Miller; Xing Rong Song
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2019-09

3.  Comparison between intranasal dexmedetomidine and intranasal ketamine as premedication for procedural sedation in children undergoing MRI: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Prakhar Gyanesh; Rudrashish Haldar; Divya Srivastava; Prashant Mohan Agrawal; Akhilesh Kumar Tiwari; P K Singh
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 2.078

4.  [Comparison of safe duration of apnea and intubation time in face mask ventilation with air versus 100% oxygen during induction of general anesthesia].

Authors:  Zi-Jia Li; Kun Lu; Kai Wang; Ying-Yin Zhao; Xia Huang; San-Qing Jin
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2017-12-20

5.  Bioavailability of dexmedetomidine after intranasal administration.

Authors:  Timo Iirola; Sanna Vilo; Tuula Manner; Riku Aantaa; Maria Lahtinen; Mika Scheinin; Klaus T Olkkola
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-02-12       Impact factor: 2.953

6.  Pain management following myringotomy and tube placement: intranasal dexmedetomidine versus intranasal fentanyl.

Authors:  Elisabeth Dewhirst; Gina Fedel; Vidya Raman; Julie Rice; N'Diris Barry; Kris R Jatana; Charles Elmaraghy; Meredith Merz; Joseph D Tobias
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 1.675

7.  Comparison of Two Different Intranasal Doses of Dexmedetomidine in Children for Magnetic Resonance Imaging Sedation.

Authors:  Aslihan Tug; Ayse Hanci; Hacer Sebnem Turk; Ferda Aybey; Canan Tulay Isil; Pinar Sayin; Sibel Oba
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.022

8.  Comparison of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine with Intranasal Clonidine as a Premedication in Surgery.

Authors:  Gurkaran Kaur Sidhu; Seema Jindal; Gurpreet Kaur; Gurpreet Singh; Kewal Krishan Gupta; Shobha Aggarwal
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2016-06-04       Impact factor: 1.967

9.  Dexmedetomidine attenuates sympathoadrenal response to tracheal intubation and reduces perioperative anaesthetic requirement.

Authors:  Varshali M Keniya; Sushma Ladi; Ramesh Naphade
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2011-07

10.  Dexmedetomidine: New avenues.

Authors:  Anju Grewal
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.