Literature DB >> 17646334

Reconstructing sibling relationships in wild populations.

Tanya Y Berger-Wolf1, Saad I Sheikh, Bhaskar DasGupta, Mary V Ashley, Isabel C Caballero, Wanpracha Chaovalitwongse, S Lahari Putrevu.   

Abstract

Reconstruction of sibling relationships from genetic data is an important component of many biological applications. In particular, the growing application of molecular markers (microsatellites) to study wild populations of plant and animals has created the need for new computational methods of establishing pedigree relationships, such as sibgroups, among individuals in these populations. Most current methods for sibship reconstruction from microsatellite data use statistical and heuristic techniques that rely on a priori knowledge about various parameter distributions. Moreover, these methods are designed for data with large number of sampled loci and small family groups, both of which typically do not hold for wild populations. We present a deterministic technique that parsimoniously reconstructs sibling groups using only Mendelian laws of inheritance. We validate our approach using both simulated and real biological data and compare it to other methods. Our method is highly accurate on real data and compares favorably with other methods on simulated data with few loci and large family groups. It is the only method that does not rely on a priori knowledge about the population under study. Thus, our method is particularly appropriate for reconstructing sibling groups in wild populations.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17646334     DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm219

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  12 in total

1.  Computationally efficient sibship and parentage assignment from multilocus marker data.

Authors:  Jinliang Wang
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Parentage and sibship inference from multilocus genotype data under polygamy.

Authors:  J Wang; A W Santure
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-02-16       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Dispersal of sibling coalitions promotes helping among immigrants in a cooperatively breeding bird.

Authors:  Stuart P Sharp; Michelle Simeoni; Ben J Hatchwell
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Estimating breeding values with molecular relatedness and reconstructed pedigrees in natural mating populations of common sole, Solea solea.

Authors:  Robbert J W Blonk; Hans Komen; Andries Kamstra; Johan A M van Arendonk
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-10-26       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  An improvement on the maximum likelihood reconstruction of pedigrees from marker data.

Authors:  J Wang
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  Reconstruction of genealogical relationships with applications to Phase III of HapMap.

Authors:  Sofia Kyriazopoulou-Panagiotopoulou; Dorna Kashef Haghighi; Sarah J Aerni; Andreas Sundquist; Sivan Bercovici; Serafim Batzoglou
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  Isomorphism and similarity for 2-generation pedigrees.

Authors:  Haitao Jiang; Guohui Lin; Weitian Tong; Daming Zhu; Binhai Zhu
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  FRANz: reconstruction of wild multi-generation pedigrees.

Authors:  Markus Riester; Peter F Stadler; Konstantin Klemm
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-02-08       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  Polygamy and an absence of fine-scale structure in Dendroctonus ponderosae (Hopk.) (Coleoptera: Curcilionidae) confirmed using molecular markers.

Authors:  J K Janes; A D Roe; A V Rice; J C Gorrell; D W Coltman; D W Langor; F A H Sperling
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 3.821

10.  Higher levels of multiple paternities increase seedling survival in the long-lived tree Eucalyptus gracilis.

Authors:  Martin F Breed; Matthew J Christmas; Andrew J Lowe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.