Literature DB >> 17646203

Individual differences in perceived bitterness predict liking of sweeteners.

Jennifer K Kamerud1, Jeannine F Delwiche.   

Abstract

Although recent molecular studies suggest that only one receptor and one signaling pathway are involved in the perception of sweetness, this seems to contradict everyday experience that people not only have different likes and dislikes of certain sweeteners but also perceive the sweeteners differently. One possible explanation is that variation in liking of sweeteners is due, in part, to variation across individuals in sensitivity to nonsweet tastes, such as bitterness, which are transduced by a variety of receptors. Fifty individuals were asked to rate intensities of several taste attributes of 10 sweeteners and to give hedonic assessments of each sweetener. Additionally, their sensitivity to 6-n-propyl-3-thiouracil (PROP) was determined. Results indicated that when matched for sweetness, the perception of bitterness and the sweetener compound were the 2 largest factors contributing to overall liking of a sweetener. Sensitivity to PROP did not contribute significantly to the model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17646203     DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjm050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Senses        ISSN: 0379-864X            Impact factor:   3.160


  10 in total

1.  Physicochemical characterization and sensory analysis of yeast-leavened and sourdough soy breads.

Authors:  Gabrielle Yezbick; Jennifer Ahn-Jarvis; Steven J Schwartz; Yael Vodovotz
Journal:  J Food Sci       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 3.167

2.  Prediction of stevia liking by sucrose liking: Effects of beverage background.

Authors:  Stephanie Oleson; Claire Murphy
Journal:  Chemosens Percept       Date:  2017-07-08       Impact factor: 1.833

3.  Measures of individual differences in taste and creaminess perception.

Authors:  Juyun Lim; Lenka Urban; Barry G Green
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2008-05-03       Impact factor: 3.160

4.  Bitterness of the non-nutritive sweetener acesulfame potassium varies with polymorphisms in TAS2R9 and TAS2R31.

Authors:  Alissa L Allen; John E McGeary; Valerie S Knopik; John E Hayes
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 3.160

5.  Do polymorphisms in chemosensory genes matter for human ingestive behavior?

Authors:  John E Hayes; Emma L Feeney; Alissa L Allen
Journal:  Food Qual Prefer       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.565

6.  Rebaudioside A and Rebaudioside D bitterness do not covary with Acesulfame K bitterness or polymorphisms in TAS2R9 and TAS2R31.

Authors:  Alissa L Allen; John E McGeary; John E Hayes
Journal:  Chemosens Percept       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 1.833

7.  Can children discriminate sugar-sweetened from non-nutritively sweetened beverages and how do they like them?

Authors:  Janne C de Ruyter; Martijn B Katan; Rosa Kas; Margreet R Olthof
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Design aspects of vaginal applicators that influence acceptance among target users.

Authors:  Alyssa J Bakke; Toral Zaveri; Molly J Higgins; Gregory R Ziegler; John E Hayes
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Nonnutritive sweeteners are not supernormal stimuli.

Authors:  R G Antenucci; J E Hayes
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 5.095

10.  The Influence of Adding Spices to Reduced Sugar Foods on Overall Liking.

Authors:  John C Peters; Ryan Marker; Zhaoxing Pan; Jeanne Anne Breen; James O Hill
Journal:  J Food Sci       Date:  2018-02-24       Impact factor: 3.167

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.