Literature DB >> 17646058

Using tailored telephone counseling to accelerate the adoption of colorectal cancer screening.

Mary E Costanza1, Roger Luckmann, Anne M Stoddard, Mary Jo White, Jennifer R Stark, Jill S Avrunin, Milagros C Rosal, Lynn Clemow.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Few interventions to increase colorectal cancer screening have used a stage of change model to promote screening adoption. None have used computer-assisted tailored telephone counseling calls. This study's purpose was to implement and evaluate stage-based computer-assisted tailored telephone counseling to promote colorectal cancer screening in a primary care population.
METHODS: This randomized controlled trial used a two-stepped intervention that included a mailed booklet on colorectal cancer screening followed by computer-assisted telephone counseling that was based on the Precaution Adoption Process Model. Chart audit was used to document completion of colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy or fecal occult blood testing.
RESULTS: Record audits were completed on 2,474 (88%) of the 2,817 eligible participants. There was no significant difference in the frequency and nature of the screening tests completed in the study arms. In a sub-analysis, stages of adoption were evaluated pre- and post-telephone counseling. Over half those receiving counseling reported a change in stage towards screening adoption.
CONCLUSION: Overall, the intervention did not increase colorectal screening compared to control. Two possible reasons for the absence of a screening effect include: (a) the focus of the protocol on education for most patients rather than motivation, and (b) the requirement that patients interested in screening seek further information and a referral on their own from their providers. While those receiving telephone counseling improved their stage of adoption, we cannot rule out selection bias. Stronger physician recommendation to speak with the counselors could improve call acceptance. Future colorectal screening should address these weaknesses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17646058     DOI: 10.1016/j.cdp.2007.04.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Detect Prev        ISSN: 0361-090X


  31 in total

1.  A randomized controlled trial of a tailored interactive computer-delivered intervention to promote colorectal cancer screening: sometimes more is just the same.

Authors:  Sally W Vernon; Leona K Bartholomew; Amy McQueen; Judy L Bettencourt; Anthony Greisinger; Sharon P Coan; David Lairson; Wenyaw Chan; S T Hawley; R E Myers
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2011-06

Review 2.  Interventions to promote colorectal cancer screening: an integrative review.

Authors:  Susan M Rawl; Usha Menon; Allison Burness; Erica S Breslau
Journal:  Nurs Outlook       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 3.250

3.  Why don't people adopt recommended health behaviors?

Authors:  Mary E Costanza
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  Sociopsychological tailoring to address colorectal cancer screening disparities: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Anthony Jerant; Richard L Kravitz; Nancy Sohler; Kevin Fiscella; Raquel L Romero; Bennett Parnes; Daniel J Tancredi; Sergio Aguilar-Gaxiola; Christina Slee; Simon Dvorak; Charles Turner; Andrew Hudnut; Francisco Prieto; Peter Franks
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2014 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.166

5.  Telehealth personalized cancer risk communication to motivate colonoscopy in relatives of patients with colorectal cancer: the family CARE Randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Anita Y Kinney; Watcharaporn Boonyasiriwat; Scott T Walters; Lisa M Pappas; Antoinette M Stroup; Marc D Schwartz; Sandra L Edwards; Amy Rogers; Wendy K Kohlmann; Kenneth M Boucher; Sally W Vernon; Rebecca G Simmons; Jan T Lowery; Kristina Flores; Charles L Wiggins; Deirdre A Hill; Randall W Burt; Marc S Williams; John C Higginbotham
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  A Randomized Trial to Compare Alternative Educational Interventions to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Hard-to-Reach Urban Minority Population with Health Insurance.

Authors:  Charles E Basch; Patricia Zybert; Randi L Wolf; Corey H Basch; Ralph Ullman; Celia Shmukler; Fionnuala King; Alfred I Neugut; Steven Shea
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2015-10

Review 7.  Personalised risk communication for informed decision making about taking screening tests.

Authors:  Adrian G K Edwards; Gurudutt Naik; Harry Ahmed; Glyn J Elwyn; Timothy Pickles; Kerry Hood; Rebecca Playle
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-02-28

Review 8.  Australia's national bowel cancer screening program: does it work for indigenous Australians?

Authors:  Aliki Christou; Judith M Katzenellenbogen; Sandra C Thompson
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Behind closed doors: physician-patient discussions about colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Amy McQueen; L Kay Bartholomew; Anthony J Greisinger; Gilda G Medina; Sarah T Hawley; Paul Haidet; Judith L Bettencourt; Navkiran K Shokar; Bruce S Ling; Sally W Vernon
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Structuring Health in Colorectal Cancer Screening Conversations: An Analysis of Intersecting Activity Systems.

Authors:  Heather Canary; Connie Bullis; Jennifer Cummings; Anita Y Kinney
Journal:  South Commun J       Date:  2015-11-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.