OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that a new orthodontic appliance with a velar extension that shifts the tongue anteriorly would reduce upper airway obstruction in infants with Pierre Robin sequence (PRS). STUDY DESIGN:Eleven infants with PRS (median age, 3 days) and an apnea index (AI) >3 were studied. The effect of the new appliance on the AI was compared with that of a conventional appliance without a velar extension by using a crossover study design with random allocation. RESULTS: Compared with baseline (mean AI, 13.8), there was a significant decrease in the AI with the new appliance (3.9; P value <.001), but no change with the conventional appliance (14.8; P = .842). Thus, the relative change in AI was -71% (95% CI, -84--49) for the new appliance and +8% (95% CI, -52-142) for the conventional appliance, which was significantly different (P = .004). No severe adverse effects were observed. CONCLUSION: This new orthodontic appliance appears to be safe and effective in reducing upper airway obstruction in infants with PRS.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that a new orthodontic appliance with a velar extension that shifts the tongue anteriorly would reduce upper airway obstruction in infants with Pierre Robin sequence (PRS). STUDY DESIGN: Eleven infants with PRS (median age, 3 days) and an apnea index (AI) >3 were studied. The effect of the new appliance on the AI was compared with that of a conventional appliance without a velar extension by using a crossover study design with random allocation. RESULTS: Compared with baseline (mean AI, 13.8), there was a significant decrease in the AI with the new appliance (3.9; P value <.001), but no change with the conventional appliance (14.8; P = .842). Thus, the relative change in AI was -71% (95% CI, -84--49) for the new appliance and +8% (95% CI, -52-142) for the conventional appliance, which was significantly different (P = .004). No severe adverse effects were observed. CONCLUSION: This new orthodontic appliance appears to be safe and effective in reducing upper airway obstruction in infants with PRS.
Authors: Alessandra Rizzoli; Michael S Urschitz; Judit Sautermeister; Silvia Miano; Jacopo Pagani; Maria P Villa; Christian F Poets Journal: Sleep Breath Date: 2008-09-20 Impact factor: 2.816
Authors: Merrill S Wise; Cynthia D Nichols; Madeleine M Grigg-Damberger; Carole L Marcus; Manisha B Witmans; Valerie G Kirk; Lynn A D'Andrea; Timothy F Hoban Journal: Sleep Date: 2011-03-01 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: R Nisha Aurora; Rochelle S Zak; Anoop Karippot; Carin I Lamm; Timothy I Morgenthaler; Sanford H Auerbach; Sabin R Bista; Kenneth R Casey; Susmita Chowdhuri; David A Kristo; Kannan Ramar Journal: Sleep Date: 2011-03-01 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Emma C Paes; Aebele B Mink van der Molen; Marvick S M Muradin; Lucienne Speleman; Frea Sloot; Moshe Kon; Corstiaan C Breugem Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2013-05-31 Impact factor: 3.573
Authors: Emma C Paes; Daan P F van Nunen; Lucienne Speleman; Marvick S M Muradin; Bram Smarius; Moshe Kon; Aebele B Mink van der Molen; Aebele B Mink van der Molen; Titia L E M Niers; Esther S Veldhoen; Corstiaan C Breugem Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2015-02-15 Impact factor: 3.573