Literature DB >> 17641755

A comparison of primary care information content in UpToDate and the National Guideline Clearinghouse.

Susan H Fenton1, Robert G Badgett.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The study sought to determine if two major resources for primary care questions have significant differences in information content and whether the number of documents found differs by disease category, patient age, or patient gender.
METHODS: Seven hundred fifty-two questions were randomly selected from the Clinical Questions Collection of the National Library of Medicine. UpToDate and the National Guidelines Clearinghouse (NGC) were searched utilizing keywords from the questions. The number of documents retrieved for each question in the resources was recorded. Chi-squared analysis was used to compare differences in retrieval between the resources. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the effect of patient age, patient gender, or disease category on the ability to find content.
RESULTS: UpToDate returned 1 or more documents for 580 questions, while NGC returned at least 1 document for 493 questions (77.1% versus 65.5% of question sampled, P = 0.001). In combination, the 2 resources returned content for 91% of searches (n = 685). NGC retrieved a mean of 16.3 documents per question versus 8.7 documents from UpToDate. Disease category was the only variable having a significant impact on the presence of online resource content.
CONCLUSIONS: UpToDate had greater breadth of content than NGC, while neither resource provided complete coverage. Current practice guidelines, as reflected by those in the NGC, addressed at most two-thirds of the selected clinical questions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17641755      PMCID: PMC1924927          DOI: 10.3163/1536-5050.95.3.255

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc        ISSN: 1536-5050


  17 in total

1.  Information needs and information seeking in community medical education.

Authors:  K W Cogdill; C P Friedman; C G Jenkins; B E Mays; M C Sharp
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 6.893

2.  Electronic information access in support of clinical decision making: a comparative study of the impact on rural health care outcomes.

Authors:  J J McGowan; M Richwine
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2000

3.  Answering family physicians' clinical questions using electronic medical databases.

Authors:  B S Alper; J J Stevermer; D S White; B G Ewigman
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 0.493

4.  UpToDate: a comprehensive clinical database.

Authors:  Gary N Fox; Nahsat Moawad
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 0.493

Review 5.  Update on inflation of journal prices: Brandon/Hill list journals and the scientific, technical, and medical publishing market.

Authors:  Joan B Schlimgen; Michael R Kronenfeld
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2004-07

6.  Evidence-based databases versus primary medical literature: an in-house investigation on their optimal use.

Authors:  Taneya Y Koonce; Nunzia Bettinsoli Giuse; Pauline Todd
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2004-10

7.  An evaluation of five bedside information products using a user-centered, task-oriented approach.

Authors:  Rose Campbell; Joan Ash
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2006-10

8.  Obstacles to answering doctors' questions about patient care with evidence: qualitative study.

Authors:  John W Ely; Jerome A Osheroff; Mark H Ebell; M Lee Chambliss; Daniel C Vinson; James J Stevermer; Eric A Pifer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-03-23

9.  The impact of evidence on physicians' inpatient treatment decisions.

Authors:  Brian P Lucas; Arthur T Evans; Brendan M Reilly; Yuri V Khodakov; Kalyani Perumal; Louis G Rohr; Joseph A Akamah; Tunji M Alausa; Christopher A Smith; Jeremy P Smith
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Use of on-line evidence-based resources at the point of care.

Authors:  Kendra Schwartz; Justin Northrup; Nejla Israel; Karen Crowell; Nehman Lauder; Anne Victoria Neale
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 1.756

View more
  7 in total

1.  Developing and using a rubric for evaluating evidence-based medicine point-of-care tools.

Authors:  Suzanne Shurtz; Margaret J Foster
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2011-07

Review 2.  A review of online evidence-based practice point-of-care information summary providers.

Authors:  Rita Banzi; Alessandro Liberati; Ivan Moschetti; Ludovica Tagliabue; Lorenzo Moja
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 5.428

3.  Evaluating the appropriateness of electronic information resources for learning.

Authors:  Dinara Saparova; Nathanial S Nolan
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2016-01

4.  To compare PubMed Clinical Queries and UpToDate in teaching information mastery to clinical residents: a crossover randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ladan Sayyah Ensan; Masoomeh Faghankhani; Anna Javanbakht; Seyed-Foad Ahmadi; Hamid Reza Baradaran
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Type of evidence behind point-of-care clinical information products: a bibliometric analysis.

Authors:  Andrea M Ketchum; Ahlam A Saleh; Kwonho Jeong
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 5.428

6.  Evaluating the Diagnostic Accuracy of a Novel Bayesian Decision-Making Algorithm for Vision Loss.

Authors:  Amy Basilious; Chris N Govas; Alexander M Deans; Pradeepa Yoganathan; Robin M Deans
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-04

7.  An experimental search strategy retrieves more precise results than PubMed and Google for questions about medical interventions.

Authors:  Robert G Badgett; Daniel P Dylla; Susan D Megison; E Glynn Harmon
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 2.984

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.