Literature DB >> 15109337

The impact of evidence on physicians' inpatient treatment decisions.

Brian P Lucas1, Arthur T Evans, Brendan M Reilly, Yuri V Khodakov, Kalyani Perumal, Louis G Rohr, Joseph A Akamah, Tunji M Alausa, Christopher A Smith, Jeremy P Smith.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Previous studies have shown that most medical inpatients receive treatment supported by strong evidence (evidence-based treatment), but they have not assessed whether and how physicians actually use evidence when making their treatment decisions. We investigated whether physicians would change inpatient treatment if presented with the results of a literature search.
DESIGN: Before-after study.
SETTING: Large public teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Random sample of 146 inpatients cared for by 33 internal medicine attending physicians.
INTERVENTIONS: After physicians committed to a specific diagnosis and treatment plan, investigators performed standardized literature searches and provided the search results to the attending physicians.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary study outcome was the number of patients whose attending physicians would change treatment due to the literature searches. These changes were evaluated by blinded peer review. A secondary outcome was the proportion of patients who received evidence-based treatment before and after the literature searches. Attending physicians changed treatment for 23 (18%) of 130 eligible patients (95% confidence interval, 12% to 24%) as a result of the literature searches. Overall, 86% of patients (112 of 130) received evidence-based treatments before the searches and 87% (113 of 130) after the searches. Changes were not related to whether patients were receiving evidence-based treatment before the search (P =.6). Panels of peer reviewers judged the quality of patient care as improved or maintained for 18 (78%) of the 23 patients with treatment changes.
CONCLUSIONS: Searching the literature could improve the treatment of many medical inpatients, including those already receiving evidence-based treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15109337      PMCID: PMC1492243          DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30306.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  21 in total

1.  Of studies, syntheses, synopses, and systems: the "4S" evolution of services for finding current best evidence.

Authors:  R B Haynes
Journal:  ACP J Club       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr

2.  Practitioners of evidence based care. Not all clinicians need to appraise evidence from scratch but all need some skills.

Authors:  G H Guyatt; M O Meade; R Z Jaeschke; D J Cook; R B Haynes
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-04-08

3.  Just in time information for clinicians: a questionnaire evaluation of the ATTRACT project.

Authors:  J Brassey; G Elwyn; C Price; P Kinnersley
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-03-03

4.  Teaching residents evidence-based medicine skills: a controlled trial of effectiveness and assessment of durability.

Authors:  C A Smith; P S Ganschow; B M Reilly; A T Evans; R A McNutt; A Osei; M Saquib; S Surabhi; S Yadav
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Feasibility of an evidence-based literature search service for general practitioners.

Authors:  C B Del Mar; C A Silagy; P P Glasziou; D Weller; A B Spinks; V Bernath; J N Anderson; D J Hilton; S L Sanders
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2001-08-06       Impact factor: 7.738

6.  Grades of recommendation for antithrombotic agents.

Authors:  G Guyatt; H Schunëmann; D Cook; R Jaeschke; S Pauker; H Bucher
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 9.410

7.  Inpatient general medicine is evidence based. A-Team, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine.

Authors:  J Ellis; I Mulligan; J Rowe; D L Sackett
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1995-08-12       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  An additional basic science for clinical medicine: III. The challenges of comparison and measurement.

Authors:  A R Feinstein
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  An additional basic science for clinical medicine: I. The constraining fundamental paradigms.

Authors:  A R Feinstein
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Randomized controlled trials and consensus as a basis for interventions in internal medicine.

Authors:  A Nordin-Johansson; K Asplund
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 8.989

View more
  19 in total

1.  Hospital care of general medicine patients: the importance of evidence.

Authors:  David Meltzer
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Current Status and Future Prospects of Clinical Psychology: Toward a Scientifically Principled Approach to Mental and Behavioral Health Care.

Authors:  Timothy B Baker; Richard M McFall; Varda Shoham
Journal:  Psychol Sci Public Interest       Date:  2008-11-01

3.  A mixed-methods analysis of a library-based hand-held intervention with rural clinicians.

Authors:  Richard L Wallace; Nakia J Woodward; Travis S Clamon
Journal:  Health Info Libr J       Date:  2014-09

4.  The essence of EBM.

Authors:  Brendan M Reilly
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-10-30

5.  Are there differences in online resources for answering primary care questions?

Authors:  Susan H Fenton; Robert Badgett
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2005

6.  A comparison of primary care information content in UpToDate and the National Guideline Clearinghouse.

Authors:  Susan H Fenton; Robert G Badgett
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2007-07

Review 7.  Health Information and Global Health Inequity: Point-of-Care Knowledge Systems as a Foundation for Progress.

Authors:  James Hudspeth; Michelle Morse
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  President's column: interoperability--the 30% solution: from dialog and rhetoric to reality.

Authors:  Kevin M Fickenscher
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  A study to investigate the factors that influence the prescribing habits of non-consultant hospital doctors in Ireland.

Authors:  B Ramasubbu; M Heron; R Ramasubbu; P Murphy
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2016-07-30       Impact factor: 1.568

10.  Deciding without data.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Darst; Jane W Newburger; Stephen Resch; Rahul H Rathod; James E Lock
Journal:  Congenit Heart Dis       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.