Literature DB >> 17639651

Do the same houses poison many children? An investigation of lead poisoning in Rochester, New York, 1993-2004.

Katrina Smith Korfmacher1, Kate Kuholski.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: In several cities, researchers have found that a discrete number of properties owned by a small number of owners house multiple lead poisoned children over time. The purpose of this study was to determine whether or not a small number of properties were implicated in the poisoning of multiple children in Rochester, New York, between 1993 and 2004.
METHODS: We analyzed the patterns of ownership and repeated positive environmental investigations (i.e., documented lead hazards) in homes of lead poisoned children using county health department data during a 12-year period.
RESULTS: A small percentage (14.8%) of properties in which the health department found a lead hazard had previously documented lead hazards. When a second positive investigation occurred, the average elapsed time between investigations was a little less than three years. Only four property owners owned more than two properties that had multiple positive investigations.
CONCLUSIONS: In some cities, a small number of properties or property owners provide housing for a large percentage of lead poisoned children. However, this situation is not universal. In Rochester, a relatively small percentage of homes that housed a child with an elevated blood lead level have a history of housing lead poisoned children. In cities like Rochester, lead hazard reduction resources should focus on high-risk housing stock determined by factors such as age, value, and condition, rather than on those with a prior record of housing lead poisoned children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17639651      PMCID: PMC1888522          DOI: 10.1177/003335490712200409

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Rep        ISSN: 0033-3549            Impact factor:   2.792


  7 in total

1.  Costs and benefits of enforcing housing policies to prevent childhood lead poisoning.

Authors:  Mary Jean Brown
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.583

2.  Childhood lead poisoning prevention: too little, too late.

Authors:  Bruce P Lanphear
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-05-11       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Evaluation of HUD-funded lead hazard control treatments at 6 years post-intervention.

Authors:  Jonathan Wilson; Tim Pivetz; Peter Ashley; David Jacobs; Warren Strauss; John Menkedick; Sherry Dixon; Hsing-Chuan Tsai; Vincent Brown; Warren Friedman; Scott Clark
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2006-06-05       Impact factor: 6.498

4.  Identifying housing that poisons: a critical step in eliminating childhood lead poisoning.

Authors:  Nimia L Reyes; Lee-Yang Wong; Patrick M MacRoy; Gerald Curtis; Pamela A Meyer; Anne Evens; Mary Jean Brown
Journal:  J Public Health Manag Pract       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec

5.  Improving strategies to prevent childhood lead poisoning using local data.

Authors:  Pamela A Meyer; Forrest Staley; Paula Staley; Jerry Curtis; Curtis Blanton; Mary Jean Brown
Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.840

6.  Community characteristics associated with elevated blood lead levels in children.

Authors:  B P Lanphear; R S Byrd; P Auinger; S J Schaffer
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Geographic analysis of blood lead levels in New York State children born 1994-1997.

Authors:  Valerie B Haley; Thomas O Talbot
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 9.031

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Lead exposures in U.S. Children, 2008: implications for prevention.

Authors:  Ronnie Levin; Mary Jean Brown; Michael E Kashtock; David E Jacobs; Elizabeth A Whelan; Joanne Rodman; Michael R Schock; Alma Padilla; Thomas Sinks
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2008-05-19       Impact factor: 9.031

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.