Literature DB >> 16740256

Evaluation of HUD-funded lead hazard control treatments at 6 years post-intervention.

Jonathan Wilson1, Tim Pivetz, Peter Ashley, David Jacobs, Warren Strauss, John Menkedick, Sherry Dixon, Hsing-Chuan Tsai, Vincent Brown, Warren Friedman, Scott Clark.   

Abstract

The Evaluation of the HUD Lead-Based Paint Hazard Control Grant Program (Evaluation) was a HUD-funded study of the effectiveness of lead hazard control (LHC) treatments conducted by 14 grantees in communities across the country. A stratified random sampling scheme was used to select treated units at four grantee sites for continued environmental assessment at 6 years post-intervention. The study compared the relative effectiveness after 6 years of the different classes of interventions used by the grantees, after controlling for such factors as housing conditions and characteristics and resident and neighborhood characteristics. Geometric mean dust-lead levels on floors and window sills were 11% and 23% lower, respectively, at 6 years post-intervention than at any preceding point following the intervention. Although geometric mean window trough dust-lead levels were slightly higher at 6 years post-intervention than at other post-intervention time periods, they were still over 75% lower than before intervention. Treatment at more-intensive levels was associated with lower window sill and window trough dust-lead levels; however, statistical modeling found no significant difference in floor dust-lead loadings over time between the levels of treatment; however, significant differences in window sill and window trough dust-lead levels between treatment levels were evident. Findings from the 6-Year Extension study indicate that across all grantees and treatment strategies the treatments applied were effective at significantly reducing environmental lead levels on floors, window sills, and window troughs at least 6 years following the intervention.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16740256     DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2006.04.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Res        ISSN: 0013-9351            Impact factor:   6.498


  9 in total

1.  Reliability of spot test kits for detecting lead in household dust.

Authors:  Katrina Smith Korfmacher; Sherry Dixon
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2007-04-16       Impact factor: 6.498

2.  Persistent organic pollutants in dust from older homes: learning from lead.

Authors:  Todd P Whitehead; Catherine Metayer; Mary H Ward; Joanne S Colt; Robert B Gunier; Nicole C Deziel; Stephen M Rappaport; Patricia A Buffler
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Boundary networks and Rochester's "smart" lead law: the use of multidisciplinary information in a collaborative policy process.

Authors:  Katrina Smith Korfmacher
Journal:  New Solut       Date:  2010

4.  Participatory testing and reporting in an environmental-justice community of Worcester, Massachusetts: a pilot project.

Authors:  Timothy J Downs; Laurie Ross; Danielle Mucciarone; Maria-Camila Calvache; Octavia Taylor; Robert Goble
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 5.984

5.  Do the same houses poison many children? An investigation of lead poisoning in Rochester, New York, 1993-2004.

Authors:  Katrina Smith Korfmacher; Kate Kuholski
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

6.  Exposure of U.S. children to residential dust lead, 1999-2004: II. The contribution of lead-contaminated dust to children's blood lead levels.

Authors:  Sherry L Dixon; Joanna M Gaitens; David E Jacobs; Warren Strauss; Jyothi Nagaraja; Tim Pivetz; Jonathan W Wilson; Peter J Ashley
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2008-11-14       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  Childhood lead poisoning: conservative estimates of the social and economic benefits of lead hazard control.

Authors:  Elise Gould
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Exposure of U.S. children to residential dust lead, 1999-2004: I. Housing and demographic factors.

Authors:  Joanna M Gaitens; Sherry L Dixon; David E Jacobs; Jyothi Nagaraja; Warren Strauss; Jonathan W Wilson; Peter J Ashley
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2008-11-14       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 9.  The urban lead (Pb) burden in humans, animals and the natural environment.

Authors:  Ronnie Levin; Carolina L Zilli Vieira; Marieke H Rosenbaum; Karyn Bischoff; Daniel C Mordarski; Mary Jean Brown
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 8.431

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.