Literature DB >> 17639125

Proteomics data validation: why all must provide data.

Lennart Martens1, Henning Hermjakob.   

Abstract

The field of proteomics has gained considerable momentum over the last years as new technologies and better instrumentation allowed the field to mature from what resembled a cottage industry into a high-throughput means to identify, characterize and quantify hundreds of proteins. The identifications and (relative) quantitation values obtained are often controversial however, as various techniques and different software platforms are used in the many laboratories worldwide. This Opinion attempts to shed some light on some of the underlying issues, and proposes certain guidelines authors can adhere to in order to allow others to validate their findings.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17639125     DOI: 10.1039/b705178f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biosyst        ISSN: 1742-2051


  5 in total

Review 1.  Computational and informatics strategies for identification of specific protein interaction partners in affinity purification mass spectrometry experiments.

Authors:  Alexey I Nesvizhskii
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.984

Review 2.  Quality assessment for clinical proteomics.

Authors:  David L Tabb
Journal:  Clin Biochem       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 3.281

Review 3.  Proteomics data repositories: providing a safe haven for your data and acting as a springboard for further research.

Authors:  Juan Antonio Vizcaíno; Joseph M Foster; Lennart Martens
Journal:  J Proteomics       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 4.044

4.  Critical Assessment of MetaProteome Investigation (CAMPI): a multi-laboratory comparison of established workflows.

Authors:  Tim Van Den Bossche; Benoit J Kunath; Kay Schallert; Stephanie S Schäpe; Paul E Abraham; Jean Armengaud; Magnus Ø Arntzen; Ariane Bassignani; Dirk Benndorf; Stephan Fuchs; Richard J Giannone; Timothy J Griffin; Live H Hagen; Rashi Halder; Céline Henry; Robert L Hettich; Robert Heyer; Pratik Jagtap; Nico Jehmlich; Marlene Jensen; Catherine Juste; Manuel Kleiner; Olivier Langella; Theresa Lehmann; Emma Leith; Patrick May; Bart Mesuere; Guylaine Miotello; Samantha L Peters; Olivier Pible; Pedro T Queiros; Udo Reichl; Bernhard Y Renard; Henning Schiebenhoefer; Alexander Sczyrba; Alessandro Tanca; Kathrin Trappe; Jean-Pierre Trezzi; Sergio Uzzau; Pieter Verschaffelt; Martin von Bergen; Paul Wilmes; Maximilian Wolf; Lennart Martens; Thilo Muth
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  Comparative proteomic analysis of genetically modified maize grown under different agroecosystems conditions in Brazil.

Authors:  Sarah Zanon Agapito-Tenfen; Miguel Pedro Guerra; Odd-Gunnar Wikmark; Rubens Onofre Nodari
Journal:  Proteome Sci       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 2.480

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.