Literature DB >> 17638574

Clinical risk factors for fractures in multi-ethnic women: the Women's Health Initiative.

Jane A Cauley1, Lieling Wu, Nina S Wampler, Janice M Barnhart, Matthew Allison, Zhao Chen, Rebecca Jackson, John Robbins.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: To identify risk factors for fractures in multi-ethnic women, we studied 159,579 women enrolled in the Women's Health Initiative. In general, risk factors for fractures were similar across ethnic groups. However, irrespective of their ethnicity, women with multiple risk factors have a high risk of fracture. Targeting these high-risk women for screening and intervention could reduce fractures.
INTRODUCTION: Fracture rates tend to be lower in minority women, but consequences may be greater. In addition, the number of fractures is expected to increase in minority women because of current demographic trends. There are limited prospective data on risk factors for fractures in minority women.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 159,579 women 50-79 yr of age enrolled in the Women's Health Initiative. Information on risk factors was obtained by questionnaire or examination. Nonspine fractures that occurred after study entry were identified over an average follow-up of 8 +/- 2.6 (SD) yr.
RESULTS: Annualized rates (%) of fracture in whites, blacks, Hispanics, Asians, and American Indians were 2.0, 0.9, 1.3, 1.2, and 2.0, respectively. Significant predictors [HR (95% CI)] of fractures by ethnic group were as follows: blacks: at least a high school education, 1.22 (1.0, 1.5); (+) fracture history, 1.7 (1.4, 2.2); and more than two falls, 1.7 (1.9, 2.0); Hispanics: height (>162 cm), 1.6 (1.1, 2.2); (+) fracture history, 1.9 (1.4, 2.5); more than two falls, 1.8 (1.4, 2.3); arthritis, 1.3 (1.1, 1.6); corticosteroid use, 3.9 (1.9, 8.0); and parental history of fracture, 1.3 (1.0, 1.6); Asians: age (per 5 yr), 1.2 (1.0, 1.3); (+) fracture history, 1.5 (1.1, 2.0); current hormone therapy (HT), 0.7 (0.5, 0.8); parity (at least five), 1.8 (1.1, 3.0); more than two falls, 1.4 (1.1, 1.9); American Indian: (+) fracture history, 2. 9 (1.5, 5.7); current HT, 0.5 (0.3, 0.9). Women with eight or more risk factors had more than a 2-fold higher rate of fracture compared with women with four or fewer risk factors. Two ethnicity x risk factor interactions were identified: age and fall history.
CONCLUSIONS: Irrespective of their ethnicity, women with multiple risk factors have a high risk of fracture. Targeting these high-risk women for screening and intervention could reduce fractures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17638574     DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.070713

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  57 in total

1.  Fracture predictive ability of physical performance tests and history of falls in elderly women: a 10-year prospective study.

Authors:  A Wihlborg; M Englund; K Åkesson; P Gerdhem
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  The influence of exogenous fat and water on lumbar spine bone mineral density in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Kyu-Nam Kim; Bom-Taeck Kim; Kwang-Min Kim; Sat-Byul Park; Nam-Seok Joo; Sang Hyeon Je; Young-Sang Kim; Duck-Joo Lee
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.759

3.  Risk factors for fracture in middle-age and older-age men of African descent.

Authors:  Yahtyng Sheu; Jane A Cauley; Alan L Patrick; Victor W Wheeler; Clareann H Bunker; Joseph M Zmuda
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  Association of trabecular bone score (TBS) and prior fracture differs among minorities in NHANES 2005-2008.

Authors:  R K Jain; T Vokes
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  Geographic and ethnic disparities in osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  Jane A Cauley; Didier Chalhoub; Ahmed M Kassem; Ghada El-Hajj Fuleihan
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 43.330

6.  Significantly higher estimated 10-year probability of fracture in lupus patients with bone mineral density comparable to that of healthy individuals.

Authors:  Anselm Mak; Jia Qing Lim; Yang Liu; Alicia Ai-cia Cheak; Roger Chun-man Ho
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2012-03-24       Impact factor: 2.631

7.  Racial differences in cortical bone and their relationship to biochemical variables in Black and White children in the early stages of puberty.

Authors:  S J Warden; K M Hill; A J Ferira; E M Laing; B R Martin; D B Hausman; C M Weaver; M Peacock; R D Lewis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Prevalence of fracture and osteoporosis risk factors in American Indian and Alaska Native people.

Authors:  Tracy Frech; Khe-ni Ma; Elizabeth D Ferrucci; Anne P Lanier; Molly McFadden; Lillian Tom-Orme; Martha L Slattery; Maureen A Murtaugh
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2012-08

Review 9.  Global trends, potential mechanisms and early detection of organ damage in SLE.

Authors:  Anselm Mak; David A Isenberg; Chak-Sing Lau
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 20.543

10.  Assessment of individual fracture risk: FRAX and beyond.

Authors:  Joop P W van den Bergh; Tineke A C M van Geel; Willem F Lems; Piet P Geusens
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 5.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.