Literature DB >> 1763839

Wire friction from ceramic brackets during simulated canine retraction.

K Tanne1, S Matsubara, T Shibaguchi, M Sakuda.   

Abstract

The present study was designed to investigate the nature of friction between orthodontic wire and various ceramic brackets. The amount of tooth movement with metal and ceramic brackets was measured, and the wire surfaces were examined microscopically immediately after artificial tooth movement. The amount of tooth movement produced by the ceramic brackets was significantly less than that produced by metal bracket. The wire surfaces were scratched more obviously by ceramic brackets than by metal bracket. Slot surfaces and edges of the ceramic brackets were substantially more porous and rougher than those surfaces of the metal bracket. These material differences between metal and ceramic brackets significantly affect the efficiency of orthodontic tooth movement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1763839     DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(1991)061<0285:WFFCBD>2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  10 in total

1.  Management of dental trauma: development of a 2D data acquisition system to evaluate passivity of dental splints.

Authors:  J Prévost; M Nivoit; Y Granjon
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Friction behavior of ceramic injection-molded (CIM) brackets.

Authors:  Susanne Reimann; Christoph Bourauel; Anna Weber; Cornelius Dirk; Thomas Lietz
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  In vitro evaluation of frictional forces of two ceramic orthodontic brackets versus a stainless steel bracket in combination with two types of archwires.

Authors:  Valiollah Arash; Mahmoud Rabiee; Vahid Rakhshan; Sara Khorasani; Farhad Sobouti
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun

4.  Resistance to Sliding in Clear and Metallic Damon 3 and Conventional Edgewise Brackets: an In vitro Study.

Authors:  Mohammad Karim Soltani; Farzaneh Golfeshan; Yoones Alizadeh; Jabraiel Mehrzad
Journal:  J Dent (Shiraz)       Date:  2015-03

5.  Comparative Evaluation of Friction Resistance of Titanium, Stainless Steel, Ceramic and Ceramic with Metal Insert Brackets with Varying Dimensions of Stainless Steel Wire: An In vitro Multi-center Study.

Authors:  B Sunil Kumar; Suresh Miryala; K Kiran Kumar; K Shameem; Ravindra Reddy Regalla
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2014-09

6.  Effects of a ceramic active self-ligating bracket on retraction/tipping/ rotation of canine, premolar mesialization, and transverse arch dimensions: A preliminary single-blind split-mouth randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Mehrnaz Moradinejad; Nasim Ghorani; Majid Heidarpour; Meysam Noori; Vahid Rakhshan
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2021-10-21

7.  Friction forces during sliding of various brackets for malaligned teeth: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Vito Crincoli; Letizia Perillo; Maria Beatrice Di Bisceglie; Antonio Balsamo; Vitaliano Serpico; Francesco Chiatante; Carmine Pappalettere; Antonio Boccaccio
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2013-02-28

8.  Effect of fluoride on friction between bracket and wire.

Authors:  Shiva Alavi; Ali Farahi
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2011-12

9.  Comparison of the frictional resistance between archwire and different bracket system: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Ajith R Pillai; Anil Gangadharan; Satheesh Kumar; Anwar Shah
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2014-07

10.  Frictional resistance in monocrystalline ceramic brackets with conventional and nonconventional elastomeric ligatures.

Authors:  Mariana Bulhoes Galvão; Matteo Camporesi; André Tortamano; Gladys Cristina Dominguez; Efisio Defraia
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 2.750

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.