Literature DB >> 17638303

Wing morphology and flight behavior of pelecaniform seabirds.

Michael L Brewer1, Fritz Hertel.   

Abstract

The selective pressures associated with flight are significant factors in shaping the morphology of volant forms. Tropical seabirds are of particular interest because of their long foraging bouts, which can last hundreds of kilometers in search of unpredictable (spatially and temporally) resources. Here, we contrast wing loading (WL), aspect ratio (AR), and planform shape among five pelecaniform seabirds and correlate morphological diversity with known differences in flight strategies. Overall, WL and AR scaled with body mass. The Great Frigratebird had lower WL than that predicted, whereas the Red-tailed Tropicbird had higher WL than that predicted. The tropicbird also exhibited a lower AR than that predicted. Visualization of planform shape was accomplished by using Thin-plate spline relative warp analysis (TPS/RWA), and three major regions of variations were discovered: wing base, mid-wing, and distal wing/wing tip. As expected, the three boobies were more similar than either the tropicbird or the frigatebird. The tropicbird had a broader distal wing and more rounded wing tip, associated with its greater use of flapping flight. The frigatebird showed the greatest deviation in the distal wing and wing tip associated with the high maneuverability required for aerial pursuit and kleptoparasitism. By using TPS/RWA, important differences were detected in planform shape that would have otherwise gone unnoticed when using only WL and AR. These differences correlated strongly with parameters such as maneuverability, flapping, and soaring flight.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17638303     DOI: 10.1002/jmor.10555

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Morphol        ISSN: 0022-2887            Impact factor:   1.804


  10 in total

1.  Phylogenetic analysis of pelecaniformes (aves) based on osteological data: implications for waterbird phylogeny and fossil calibration studies.

Authors:  Nathan D Smith
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  The evolution of avian wing shape and previously unrecognized trends in covert feathering.

Authors:  Xia Wang; Julia A Clarke
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Wing morphology, winter ecology, and fecundity selection: evidence for sex-dependence in barn swallows (Hirundo rustica).

Authors:  Nicola Saino; Roberto Ambrosini; Manuela Caprioli; Felix Liechti; Andrea Romano; Diego Rubolini; Chiara Scandolara
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Wing Shape in Waterbirds: Morphometric Patterns Associated with Behavior, Habitat, Migration, and Phylogenetic Convergence.

Authors:  Stephanie L Baumgart; Paul C Sereno; Mark W Westneat
Journal:  Integr Org Biol       Date:  2021-05-17

5.  Wake structure and kinematics in two insectivorous bats.

Authors:  Tatjana Y Hubel; Nickolay I Hristov; Sharon M Swartz; Kenneth S Breuer
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Bat Species Comparisons Based on External Morphology: A Test of Traditional versus Geometric Morphometric Approaches.

Authors:  Daniela A Schmieder; Hugo A Benítez; Ivailo M Borissov; Carmelo Fruciano
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Water striders adjust leg movement speed to optimize takeoff velocity for their morphology.

Authors:  Eunjin Yang; Jae Hak Son; Sang-Im Lee; Piotr G Jablonski; Ho-Young Kim
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Functional morphology and integration of corvid skulls - a 3D geometric morphometric approach.

Authors:  Christoph Kulemeyer; Kolja Asbahr; Philipp Gunz; Sylke Frahnert; Franz Bairlein
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2009-01-07       Impact factor: 3.172

9.  Ecology and caudal skeletal morphology in birds: the convergent evolution of pygostyle shape in underwater foraging taxa.

Authors:  Ryan N Felice; Patrick M O'Connor
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Interspecific and intraspecific foraging differentiation of neighbouring tropical seabirds.

Authors:  R E Austin; F De Pascalis; S C Votier; J Haakonsson; J P Y Arnould; G Ebanks-Petrie; J Newton; J Harvey; J A Green
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 3.600

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.