Literature DB >> 17638217

Catheter rupture and distal embolisation: a rare complication of central venous ports.

R Biffi1, F Orsi, F Grasso, F De Braud, S Cenciarelli, B Andreoni.   

Abstract

Central venous access devices placed through a percutaneous subclavian approach may be compressed by neighbouring bony structures, leading to biomaterial fatigue, catheter fracture at the compression site, and possible embolisation of distal fragment into the central veins. The aim of this paper is to review the experience of the authors, including more than 1300 subclavian port placements, carried out during a five-year period, discussing possible causes and therapeutic options of this rare complication. Nine patients out of 1320 (0.68%) experienced this complication during the five-year period of this study. Two patients only showed a retrospective radiologic evidence of the 'pinch-off sign' (e.g. initial compression of the catheter at the costo-clavicular junction). No patients had symptoms from the embolised catheter fragment; the most frequent symptom (8 out of 9 cases) was a painful swelling around the port area during infusion, related to the extravasation of medications or fluids into the subcutaneous tissue. The site of embolised segment varied from azygos vein to right pulmonary artery; however, these findings did not affect the outcome, and all the embolised fragments were successfully retrieved through a transfemoral approach using a radiologic interventional technique. No fatality occurred. The catheter fracture and embolisation of the distal fragment are a well-known complication of subclavian central venous long-term cannulation, whose estimated overall incidence is 0.5-1%. Diagnosis is usually based on the radiologic appearance of the catheter compression (so called 'pinch-off sign'), which is far from being constant; a clinical suspicion can derive from intermittent malfunction, which claims differential diagnosis with the pres-ence of a fibrin sleeve around the tip of the catheter. Once diagnosed, the treatment is always an interventional radiologic approach, which has a very high success rate. When it fails, the possibility to leave the fragment embolised in the central veins, heart or pulmonary arteries, should be considered, being the thoracotomy and open catheter retraction questionable, at present time, in patients who have no symptoms and limited life-expectancy.

Entities:  

Year:  2000        PMID: 17638217     DOI: 10.1177/112972980000100106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Access        ISSN: 1129-7298            Impact factor:   2.283


  4 in total

1.  Current situation regarding central venous port implantation procedures and complications: a questionnaire-based survey of 11,693 implantations in Japan.

Authors:  Masatoshi Shiono; Shin Takahashi; Masanobu Takahashi; Takuhiro Yamaguchi; Chikashi Ishioka
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Central venous port systems as an integral part of chemotherapy.

Authors:  Ulf K Teichgräber; Robert Pfitzmann; Herbert A F Hofmann
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 5.594

3.  Adjuvant Chemotherapy Using the FOLFOX Regimen in Colon Cancer.

Authors:  Hyeong-Joon Jeon; Jin-Hee Woo; Hak-Yoon Lee; Ki-Jae Park; Hong-Jo Choi
Journal:  J Korean Soc Coloproctol       Date:  2011-06-30

4.  Upper arm central venous port implantation: a 6-year single institutional retrospective analysis and pictorial essay of procedures for insertion.

Authors:  Masatoshi Shiono; Shin Takahashi; Yuichi Kakudo; Masanobu Takahashi; Hideki Shimodaira; Shunsuke Kato; Chikashi Ishioka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.