Literature DB >> 17638082

Assessing the use of the "opening angle method" to enforce residual stresses in patient-specific arteries.

Victor Alastrué1, Estefanía Peña, Miguel Angel Martínez, Manuel Doblaré.   

Abstract

Numerical and analytical studies on cylindrical geometries have shown the relevance of accounting for residual stresses in arterial modeling. However, multiple difficulties, both geometrical and numerical, arise when enforcing residual stresses in patient-specific arteries. This is the reason of the few simulations that have been developed on this kind of geometries. In this paper we present a methodology that allows to include residual stresses in arbitrary geometries. Since it is not necessary to know the opened configuration of the artery, it makes it possible to take advantage of non-invasive image acquisition techniques such as CT or MRI to create customized arterial models. A simplified initial strain field showing its accuracy when applied to actual in vivo closed geometries is hypothesized from an opening angle experiment. In addition to residual stresses, the anisotropic hyperelastic and multilayered nature of the arterial tissue was accounted for the simulations of the behavior of a human coronary and iliac arteries. Results show the relevance of considering all these features for getting realistic results and the relative accuracy of using approximate solutions of residual stresses in patient-specific arterial simulations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17638082     DOI: 10.1007/s10439-007-9352-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0090-6964            Impact factor:   3.934


  11 in total

1.  A novel arterial constitutive model in a commercial finite element package: Application to balloon angioplasty.

Authors:  Xuefeng Zhao; Yi Liu; Wei Zhang; Chong Wang; Ghassan S Kassab
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 2.691

2.  Open Problems in Computational Vascular Biomechanics: Hemodynamics and Arterial Wall Mechanics.

Authors:  C A Taylor; J D Humphrey
Journal:  Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 6.756

3.  A Computational Framework for Fluid-Solid-Growth Modeling in Cardiovascular Simulations.

Authors:  C Alberto Figueroa; Seungik Baek; Charles A Taylor; Jay D Humphrey
Journal:  Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 6.756

4.  Intramural Distributions of GAGs and Collagen vs. Opening Angle of the Intact Porcine Aortic Wall.

Authors:  Noor M Ghadie; Jean-Philippe St-Pierre; Michel R Labrosse
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 5.  Multiscale simulations of left ventricular growth and remodeling.

Authors:  Hossein Sharifi; Charles K Mann; Alexus L Rockward; Mohammad Mehri; Joy Mojumder; Lik-Chuan Lee; Kenneth S Campbell; Jonathan F Wenk
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2021-08-25

6.  Immersed boundary-finite element model of fluid-structure interaction in the aortic root.

Authors:  Vittoria Flamini; Abe DeAnda; Boyce E Griffith
Journal:  Theor Comput Fluid Dyn       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 1.606

7.  Origin of axial prestretch and residual stress in arteries.

Authors:  L Cardamone; A Valentín; J F Eberth; J D Humphrey
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2009-12

8.  Reconstructing vascular homeostasis by growth-based prestretch and optimal fiber deposition.

Authors:  Jiacheng Wu; Christoph M Augustin; Shawn C Shadden
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2020-11-07

9.  Toward Elucidating the Physiological Impacts of Residual Stresses in the Colorectum.

Authors:  Y Zhao; S Siri; B Feng; D M Pierce
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 2.097

10.  Dynamic behavior of suture-anastomosed arteries and implications to vascular surgery operations.

Authors:  Panayiotis C Roussis; Antonios E Giannakopoulos; Haralambia P Charalambous; Demetra C Demetriou; Georgios P Georghiou
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 2.819

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.