Literature DB >> 17637873

Clinical utility of breast magnetic resonance imaging in patients presenting with primary breast cancer.

Tuoc N Dao1, Jeffrey P Lamont, Sally M Knox.   

Abstract

Since magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the breast has been shown to be sensitive in identifying the extent of the primary tumor and other foci of cancer, we examined its clinical utility in the surgical management of breast cancer patients. From January 2004 to April 2007, 117 patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer underwent bilateral MRI prior to definitive surgical management. Additional lesions were found in 27 patients (23.1%) in the ipsilateral breast and 19 patients (16.2%) in the contralateral breast. Twelve patients (10.3%) had more than one new lesion identified. Six patients (5.1%) had a larger area of tumor than detected by mammography or ultrasound. Additional biopsies were performed in 27 patients (23.1%). Additional foci of cancer were identified in 17 patients (14.5%): 12 (10.2%) in the ipsilateral breast and 5 (4.3%) in the contralateral breast. This information changed the clinical management in 23 cases (19.7%). Further studies are needed to confirm the benefits of MRI relative to its costs and to further identify the appropriate patients to undergo this imaging procedure.

Entities:  

Year:  2007        PMID: 17637873      PMCID: PMC1906568          DOI: 10.1080/08998280.2007.11928291

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)        ISSN: 0899-8280


  16 in total

1.  Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer.

Authors:  Christiane K Kuhl; Simone Schrading; Claudia C Leutner; Nuschin Morakkabati-Spitz; Eva Wardelmann; Rolf Fimmers; Walther Kuhn; Hans H Schild
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-11-20       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Assessment of suspected breast cancer by MRI: a prospective clinical trial using a combined kinetic and morphologic analysis.

Authors:  Jonathan I Wiener; Kathy J Schilling; Carol Adami; Nancy A Obuchowski
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Screening women at high risk for breast cancer with mammography and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Constance D Lehman; Jeffrey D Blume; Paul Weatherall; David Thickman; Nola Hylton; Ellen Warner; Etta Pisano; Stuart J Schnitt; Constantine Gatsonis; Mitchell Schnall; Gia A DeAngelis; Paul Stomper; Eric L Rosen; Michael O'Loughlin; Steven Harms; David A Bluemke
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2005-05-01       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Prospective comparison of standard triple assessment and dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the breast for the evaluation of symptomatic breast lesions.

Authors:  P J Drew; L W Turnbull; S Chatterjee; J Read; P J Carleton; J N Fox; J R Monson; M J Kerin
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS).

Authors:  M O Leach; C R M Boggis; A K Dixon; D F Easton; R A Eeles; D G R Evans; F J Gilbert; I Griebsch; R J C Hoff; P Kessar; S R Lakhani; S M Moss; A Nerurkar; A R Padhani; L J Pointon; D Thompson; R M L Warren
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 May 21-27       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Effect of age, breast density, and family history on the sensitivity of first screening mammography.

Authors:  K Kerlikowske; D Grady; J Barclay; E A Sickles; V Ernster
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-07-03       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 7.  A clinical oncology perspective on the use of breast MR.

Authors:  Monica Morrow; Gary Freedman
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.266

8.  Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition.

Authors:  Mieke Kriege; Cecile T M Brekelmans; Carla Boetes; Peter E Besnard; Harmine M Zonderland; Inge Marie Obdeijn; Radu A Manoliu; Theo Kok; Hans Peterse; Madeleine M A Tilanus-Linthorst; Sara H Muller; Sybren Meijer; Jan C Oosterwijk; Louk V A M Beex; Rob A E M Tollenaar; Harry J de Koning; Emiel J T Rutgers; Jan G M Klijn
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-07-29       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations.

Authors:  Thomas M Kolb; Jacob Lichy; Jeffrey H Newhouse
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examination.

Authors:  Ellen Warner; Donald B Plewes; Kimberley A Hill; Petrina A Causer; Judit T Zubovits; Roberta A Jong; Margaret R Cutrara; Gerrit DeBoer; Martin J Yaffe; Sandra J Messner; Wendy S Meschino; Cameron A Piron; Steven A Narod
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  4 in total

1.  Assessment of MRI-detected lesions on screening tomosynthesis in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer.

Authors:  Sadia Choudhery; Eric Polley; Amy Lynn Conners
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 1.605

2.  Innovations in surgical oncology at Baylor University Medical Center.

Authors:  Joseph A Kuhn; Tammy Fisher; Sheryl Livingston
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2008-01

3.  The Yield of Pre-operative Breast MRI in Patients According to Breast Tissue Density.

Authors:  Jean M Seely; Leslie Lamb; Neera Malik; Jacqueline Lau
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative assessment of patients with primary breast cancer: systematic review of diagnostic accuracy and meta-analysis.

Authors:  María Nieves Plana; Carmen Carreira; Alfonso Muriel; Miguel Chiva; Víctor Abraira; Jose Ignacio Emparanza; Xavier Bonfill; Javier Zamora
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 5.315

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.