Literature DB >> 17635520

Different effects of ribosome biogenesis inhibition on cell proliferation in retinoblastoma protein- and p53-deficient and proficient human osteosarcoma cell lines.

L Montanaro1, G Mazzini, S Barbieri, M Vici, A Nardi-Pantoli, M Govoni, G Donati, D Treré, M Derenzini.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of rRNA synthesis inhibition on cell cycle progression and cell population growth according to the RB and p53 status.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: RB- and p53-proficient U2OS cells and the RB- and p53-deficient SAOS-2 cells were used, rRNA transcription hindered by actinomycin D, and cell cycle analysed by flow cytometry.
RESULTS: One hour of actinomycin D treatment induced in U2OS cells a block at the cell cycle checkpoints G(1)-S and G(2)-M, which was removed only after rRNA synthesis was resumed. rRNA synthesis inhibition did not influence cell cycle progression in SAOS-2 cells. No effect on cell cycle progression after actinomycin D-induced rRNA inhibition was also found in U2OS cells silenced for RB and p53 expression. A mild perturbation of cell cycle progression was observed in U2OS cells silenced for the expression of either RB or p53 alone. We also treated U2OS and SAOS-2 cells with actinomycin D for 1 h/day for 5 days. This treatment lightly reduced growth rate of the U2OS cell population, whereas cell population growth of SAOS-2 cells was completely inhibited. A marked reduction of ribosome content occurred in SAOS-2 cells after the long-term actinomycin D treatment, whereas no modification was observed in U2OS cells.
CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that inhibition of ribosome biogenesis does not hinder cell cycle progression in RB- and p53-deficient cells. A daily-repeated transitory inhibition of ribosome biogenesis leads to a progressive reduction of ribosome content with the consequent extinction of cancer cell population lacking RB and p53.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17635520      PMCID: PMC6495848          DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2184.2007.00448.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Prolif        ISSN: 0960-7722            Impact factor:   6.831


  41 in total

1.  Proliferation, but not growth, blocked by conditional deletion of 40S ribosomal protein S6.

Authors:  S Volarevic; M J Stewart; B Ledermann; F Zilberman; L Terracciano; E Montini; M Grompe; S C Kozma; G Thomas
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-06-16       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  An encore for ribosome biogenesis in the control of cell proliferation.

Authors:  G Thomas
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 28.824

3.  p53 represses ribosomal gene transcription.

Authors:  A Budde; I Grummt
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  1999-01-28       Impact factor: 9.867

4.  Phosphorylation by G1-specific cdk-cyclin complexes activates the nucleolar transcription factor UBF.

Authors:  R Voit; M Hoffmann; I Grummt
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1999-04-01       Impact factor: 11.598

5.  Flow cytometric measurement of nuclear DNA content variations as a potential in vivo mutagenicity test.

Authors:  F J Otto; H Oldiges; W Göhde; V K Jain
Journal:  Cytometry       Date:  1981-11

6.  Ribosomal protein L23 activates p53 by inhibiting MDM2 function in response to ribosomal perturbation but not to translation inhibition.

Authors:  Mu-Shui Dai; Shelya X Zeng; Yetao Jin; Xiao-Xin Sun; Larry David; Hua Lu
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  Disruption of the nucleolus mediates stabilization of p53 in response to DNA damage and other stresses.

Authors:  Carlos P Rubbi; Jo Milner
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2003-11-17       Impact factor: 11.598

8.  Rb inactivation promotes genomic instability by uncoupling cell cycle progression from mitotic control.

Authors:  Eva Hernando; Zaher Nahlé; Gloria Juan; Elena Diaz-Rodriguez; Miguel Alaminos; Michael Hemann; Loren Michel; Vivek Mittal; William Gerald; Robert Benezra; Scott W Lowe; Carlos Cordon-Cardo
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-08-12       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Cyclin-dependent kinases govern formation and maintenance of the nucleolus.

Authors:  Valentina Sirri; Danièle Hernandez-Verdun; Pascal Roussel
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2002-03-18       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  Inactivation of p53 gene in human and murine osteosarcoma cells.

Authors:  N Chandar; B Billig; J McMaster; J Novak
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  23 in total

1.  MicroRNA-503 represses epithelial-mesenchymal transition and inhibits metastasis of osteosarcoma by targeting c-myb.

Authors:  Xinzhen Guo; Jie Zhang; Jianfeng Pang; Sheng He; Guojun Li; Yang Chong; Chao Li; Zhijian Jiao; Shiqian Zhang; Ming Shao
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2016-01-14

2.  Dyskerin is required for tumor cell growth through mechanisms that are independent of its role in telomerase and only partially related to its function in precursor rRNA processing.

Authors:  Faizan Alawi; Ping Lin
Journal:  Mol Carcinog       Date:  2010-12-10       Impact factor: 4.784

3.  Ribosomal protein S15A augments human osteosarcoma cell proliferation in vitro.

Authors:  Chen Zhang; Ting Zhang; E Song; S W A Himaya; Xianzhen Chen; Longpo Zheng
Journal:  Cancer Biother Radiopharm       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.099

4.  The Thoc1 ribonucleoprotein and prostate cancer progression.

Authors:  Meenalakshmi Chinnam; Yanqing Wang; Xiaojing Zhang; David L Gold; Thaer Khoury; Alexander Yu Nikitin; Barbara A Foster; Yanping Li; Wiam Bshara; Carl D Morrison; Rochelle D Payne Ondracek; James L Mohler; David W Goodrich
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Drosha regulates hMSCs cell cycle progression through a miRNA independent mechanism.

Authors:  Adam Z Oskowitz; Patrice Penfornis; Alan Tucker; Darwin J Prockop; Radhika Pochampally
Journal:  Int J Biochem Cell Biol       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 5.085

6.  miR-454 is down-regulated in osteosarcomas and suppresses cell proliferation and invasion by directly targeting c-Met.

Authors:  Guangfeng Niu; Bin Li; Jianmin Sun; Li Sun
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 6.831

Review 7.  PAQR3: a novel tumor suppressor gene.

Authors:  Xin Yu; Zheng Li; Matthew Tv Chan; William Ka Kei Wu
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 6.166

8.  Expression of targeted ribozyme against telomerase RNA causes altered expression of several other genes in tumor cells.

Authors:  Suresh Kumar Ramakrishnan; Akhil Varshney; Amod Sharma; Bhudev C Das; Pramod K Yadava
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-03-25

9.  Housekeeping genes in prostate tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Jinyoung Byun; Christopher J Logothetis; Ivan P Gorlov
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 7.396

10.  Nucleolar proteins suppress Caenorhabditis elegans innate immunity by inhibiting p53/CEP-1.

Authors:  Laura E Fuhrman; Ajay Kumar Goel; Jason Smith; Kevin V Shianna; Alejandro Aballay
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.