OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of rRNA synthesis inhibition on cell cycle progression and cell population growth according to the RB and p53 status. MATERIAL AND METHODS: RB- and p53-proficient U2OS cells and the RB- and p53-deficient SAOS-2 cells were used, rRNA transcription hindered by actinomycin D, and cell cycle analysed by flow cytometry. RESULTS: One hour of actinomycin D treatment induced in U2OS cells a block at the cell cycle checkpoints G(1)-S and G(2)-M, which was removed only after rRNA synthesis was resumed. rRNA synthesis inhibition did not influence cell cycle progression in SAOS-2 cells. No effect on cell cycle progression after actinomycin D-induced rRNA inhibition was also found in U2OS cells silenced for RB and p53 expression. A mild perturbation of cell cycle progression was observed in U2OS cells silenced for the expression of either RB or p53 alone. We also treated U2OS and SAOS-2 cells with actinomycin D for 1 h/day for 5 days. This treatment lightly reduced growth rate of the U2OS cell population, whereas cell population growth of SAOS-2 cells was completely inhibited. A marked reduction of ribosome content occurred in SAOS-2 cells after the long-term actinomycin D treatment, whereas no modification was observed in U2OS cells. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that inhibition of ribosome biogenesis does not hinder cell cycle progression in RB- and p53-deficient cells. A daily-repeated transitory inhibition of ribosome biogenesis leads to a progressive reduction of ribosome content with the consequent extinction of cancer cell population lacking RB and p53.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of rRNA synthesis inhibition on cell cycle progression and cell population growth according to the RB and p53 status. MATERIAL AND METHODS:RB- and p53-proficient U2OS cells and the RB- and p53-deficient SAOS-2 cells were used, rRNA transcription hindered by actinomycin D, and cell cycle analysed by flow cytometry. RESULTS: One hour of actinomycin D treatment induced in U2OS cells a block at the cell cycle checkpoints G(1)-S and G(2)-M, which was removed only after rRNA synthesis was resumed. rRNA synthesis inhibition did not influence cell cycle progression in SAOS-2 cells. No effect on cell cycle progression after actinomycin D-induced rRNA inhibition was also found in U2OS cells silenced for RB and p53 expression. A mild perturbation of cell cycle progression was observed in U2OS cells silenced for the expression of either RB or p53 alone. We also treated U2OS and SAOS-2 cells with actinomycin D for 1 h/day for 5 days. This treatment lightly reduced growth rate of the U2OS cell population, whereas cell population growth of SAOS-2 cells was completely inhibited. A marked reduction of ribosome content occurred in SAOS-2 cells after the long-term actinomycin D treatment, whereas no modification was observed in U2OS cells. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that inhibition of ribosome biogenesis does not hinder cell cycle progression in RB- and p53-deficient cells. A daily-repeated transitory inhibition of ribosome biogenesis leads to a progressive reduction of ribosome content with the consequent extinction of cancer cell population lacking RB and p53.
Authors: S Volarevic; M J Stewart; B Ledermann; F Zilberman; L Terracciano; E Montini; M Grompe; S C Kozma; G Thomas Journal: Science Date: 2000-06-16 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Eva Hernando; Zaher Nahlé; Gloria Juan; Elena Diaz-Rodriguez; Miguel Alaminos; Michael Hemann; Loren Michel; Vivek Mittal; William Gerald; Robert Benezra; Scott W Lowe; Carlos Cordon-Cardo Journal: Nature Date: 2004-08-12 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Chen Zhang; Ting Zhang; E Song; S W A Himaya; Xianzhen Chen; Longpo Zheng Journal: Cancer Biother Radiopharm Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 3.099
Authors: Meenalakshmi Chinnam; Yanqing Wang; Xiaojing Zhang; David L Gold; Thaer Khoury; Alexander Yu Nikitin; Barbara A Foster; Yanping Li; Wiam Bshara; Carl D Morrison; Rochelle D Payne Ondracek; James L Mohler; David W Goodrich Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2014-10-08 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Adam Z Oskowitz; Patrice Penfornis; Alan Tucker; Darwin J Prockop; Radhika Pochampally Journal: Int J Biochem Cell Biol Date: 2011-07-20 Impact factor: 5.085