Literature DB >> 17635238

Tissue microarray is inappropriate for analysis of BCL6 expression in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Johan Linderoth1, Mats Ehinger, Måns Akerman, Eva Cavallin-Ståhl, Gunilla Enblad, Martin Erlanson, Mats Jerkeman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In this study, our aim was to investigate how different immunohistochemical techniques may influence the result of BCL6 positivity and categorization in germinal center (GC) and non-GC derived diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), as it has been proposed that classification of DLBCL according to cell-of-origin by immunohistochemistry may be performed as a routine procedure in the diagnostic work-up. However, a number of technical issues need to be solved before introducing this as a standard technique.
METHODS: Tumor specimens from 122 patients with de novo stage II-IV disease, adequately treated with anthracycline-containing chemotherapy regimens were collected. Immunohistochemical expression of BCL6, CD10, and MUM-1/IRF4 was examined using a tissue microarray (TMA) technique. BCL6 and CD10 were also evaluated on whole tissue sections.
RESULTS: Due to profound tissue heterogeneity, BCL6 showed a wide range of positivity, with a high number of false negative results by TMA (25% positive), compared to 53% on whole tissue sections (WTS). CD10 was more homogeneously expressed, and TMA results corresponded better to WTS. Consequently, the results from categorization into GC and non-GC DLBCL differed considerably by use of the two methods, and resulted in very different outcome in terms of overall survival.
CONCLUSION: Immunohistochemical GC-status determined on TMA is not reliable enough to be used for individual treatment decisions in DLBCL, mostly due to difficulties in interpreting BCL6 status.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17635238     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0609.2007.00892.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Haematol        ISSN: 0902-4441            Impact factor:   2.997


  8 in total

1.  Retraction note to: KDM3A confers metastasis and chemoresistance in epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Mol Histol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.611

2.  PIK3CD promoted proliferation in diffuse large B cell lymphoma through upregulation of c-myc.

Authors:  Wenli Cui; Shutao Zheng; Xinxia Li; Yuqing Ma; Wei Sang; Ming Liu; Wei Zhang; Xiaoyan Zhou
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2016-07-22

3.  Brachyury, SOX-9, and podoplanin, new markers in the skull base chordoma vs chondrosarcoma differential: a tissue microarray-based comparative analysis.

Authors:  Gerard J Oakley; Kim Fuhrer; Raja R Seethala
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2008-09-26       Impact factor: 7.842

4.  Tissue microarrays: one size does not fit all.

Authors:  Jeanette E Eckel-Passow; Christine M Lohse; Yuri Sheinin; Paul L Crispen; Christopher J Krco; Eugene D Kwon
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 2.644

5.  Clinicopathological significance of p38β, p38γ, and p38δ and its biological roles in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Shutao Zheng; Chenchen Yang; Tao Liu; Qing Liu; Fang Dai; Ilyar Sheyhidin; Xiaomei Lu
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-12-14

6.  B7-H3 expression in colorectal cancer: associations with clinicopathological parameters and patient outcome.

Authors:  Vibeke A Ingebrigtsen; Kjetil Boye; Jahn M Nesland; Arild Nesbakken; Kjersti Flatmark; Øystein Fodstad
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  PIK3CA expression in diffuse large B cell lymphoma tissue and the effect of its knockdown in vitro.

Authors:  Wenli Cui; Shutao Zheng; Zebing Liu; Weige Wang; Ying Cai; Rui Bi; Bing Cao; Xiaoyan Zhou
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Expression and Prognostic Significance of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptors 1, 2 and 3 in Periampullary Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Jacob Elebro; Margareta Heby; Carl Fredrik Warfvinge; Björn Nodin; Jakob Eberhard; Karin Jirström
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.