Literature DB >> 17632793

Genetic, geographic, and environmental correlates of human temporal bone variation.

Heather F Smith1, Claire E Terhune, Charles A Lockwood.   

Abstract

Temporal bone shape has been shown to reflect molecular phylogenetic relationships among hominoids and offers significant morphological detail for distinguishing taxa. Although it is generally accepted that temporal bone shape, like other aspects of morphology, has an underlying genetic component, the relative influence of genetic and environmental factors is unclear. To determine the impact of genetic differentiation and environmental variation on temporal bone morphology, we used three-dimensional geometric morphometric techniques to evaluate temporal bone variation in 11 modern human populations. Population differences were investigated by discriminant function analysis, and the strength of the relationships between morphology, neutral molecular distance, geographic distribution, and environmental variables were assessed by matrix correlation comparisons. Significant differences were found in temporal bone shape among all populations, and classification rates using cross-validation were relatively high. Comparisons of morphological distances to molecular distances based on short tandem repeats (STRs) revealed a significant correlation between temporal bone shape and neutral molecular distance among Old World populations, but not when Native Americans were included. Further analyses suggested a similar pattern for morphological variation and geographic distribution. No significant correlations were found between temporal bone shape and environmental variables: temperature, annual rainfall, latitude, or altitude. Significant correlations were found between temporal bone size and both temperature and latitude, presumably reflecting Bergmann's rule. Thus, temporal bone morphology appears to partially follow an isolation by distance model of evolution among human populations, although levels of correlation show that a substantial component of variation is unexplained by factors considered here. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17632793     DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.20671

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol        ISSN: 0002-9483            Impact factor:   2.868


  14 in total

1.  A computerized tomography study of the morphological interrelationship between the temporal bones and the craniofacial complex.

Authors:  Helder Nunes Costa; Rudolf Slavicek; Sadao Sato
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Deep evolutionary roots of strepsirrhine primate labyrinthine morphology.

Authors:  Renaud Lebrun; Marcia P de León; Paul Tafforeau; Christoph Zollikofer
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2009-12-21       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  Genetic and environmental contributions to variation in baboon cranial morphology.

Authors:  Charles C Roseman; Katherine E Willmore; Jeffrey Rogers; Charles Hildebolt; Brooke E Sadler; Joan T Richtsmeier; James M Cheverud
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.868

4.  Using CRANID to test the population affinity of known crania.

Authors:  Lauren Kallenberger; Varsha Pilbrow
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2012-08-27       Impact factor: 2.610

5.  Average thickness of the bones of the human neurocranium: development of reference measurements to assist with blunt force trauma interpretations.

Authors:  Samantha K Rowbotham; Calvin G Mole; Diana Tieppo; Magda Blaszkowska; Stephen M Cordner; Soren Blau
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 2.686

6.  Three-dimensional analysis of temporomandibular joint in Chinese adults with normal occlusion and harmonious skeleton.

Authors:  Abbas Ahmed Abdulqader; Liling Ren; Maged Alhammadi; Zainab Abdulkader Abdu; Abdo Ahmed Saleh Mohamed
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 1.852

7.  A genome-wide association study identifies five loci influencing facial morphology in Europeans.

Authors:  Fan Liu; Fedde van der Lijn; Claudia Schurmann; Gu Zhu; M Mallar Chakravarty; Pirro G Hysi; Andreas Wollstein; Oscar Lao; Marleen de Bruijne; M Arfan Ikram; Aad van der Lugt; Fernando Rivadeneira; André G Uitterlinden; Albert Hofman; Wiro J Niessen; Georg Homuth; Greig de Zubicaray; Katie L McMahon; Paul M Thompson; Amro Daboul; Ralf Puls; Katrin Hegenscheid; Liisa Bevan; Zdenka Pausova; Sarah E Medland; Grant W Montgomery; Margaret J Wright; Carol Wicking; Stefan Boehringer; Timothy D Spector; Tomáš Paus; Nicholas G Martin; Reiner Biffar; Manfred Kayser
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  The role of genetic drift in shaping modern human cranial evolution: a test using microevolutionary modeling.

Authors:  Heather F Smith
Journal:  Int J Evol Biol       Date:  2011-03-03

9.  Developmental Changes in Morphology of the Middle and Posterior External Cranial Base in Modern Homo sapiens.

Authors:  Deepal H Dalal; Heather F Smith
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Phenotypic variation in infants, not adults, reflects genotypic variation among chimpanzees and bonobos.

Authors:  Naoki Morimoto; Marcia S Ponce de León; Christoph P E Zollikofer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.