Literature DB >> 17632312

Noncycloplegic photorefractive screening in pre-school children with the "PowerRefractor" in a pediatric practice.

Frank Schaeffel1, Ute Mathis, Gunther Brüggemann.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To provide a framework for typical refractive development, as measured without cycloplegia with a commercial infrared photorefractor. To evaluate the usefulness of the screening for refractive errors, we retrospectively analyzed the data of a large number of unselected children of different ages in a pediatric practice in Tuebingen, Germany.
METHODS: During the standard regular preventive examinations that are performed in 80% to 90% of the young children in Germany by a pediatrician (the German "U1 to U9" system), 736 children were also measured with the first generation PowerRefractor (made by MCS, Reutlingen, Germany, but no longer available in this version). Of those, 172 were also measured with +3 D spectacles to find out whether this helps detect hyperopia. Children with more than +2 D of hyperopia or astigmatism, more than 1.5 D of anisometropia, or more than 1 D of myopia in the second year of life were referred to an eye care specialist. The actions taken by the eye care specialist were used to evaluate the merits of the screening.
RESULTS: The average noncycloplegic spherical refractive errors in the right eyes declined linearly from +0.93 to +0.62 D over the first 6 years (p < 0.001)-between 1.5 and 0.5 D less hyperopic than in published studies with cycloplegic retinoscopy. As expected, +3 D spectacle lenses moved the refractions into the myopic direction, but this shift was not smaller in hyperopic children. The average negative cylinder magnitudes declined from -0.89 to 0.48 D (linear regression: p < 0.001). The J0 components displayed high correlations in both eyes (p < 0.001) but the J45 components did not. The average absolute anisometropias (difference of spheres) declined from 0.37 to 0.23 (linear regression: p < 0.001). Of the 736 children, 85 (11.5%) were referred to an eye care specialist. Of these, 52 received spectacles (61.2%), 14 (16.4%) were identified as "at risk" and remained under observation, and 18 (21.2%) were considered "false-positive."
CONCLUSIONS: Non cycloplegic photorefraction provides considerably less hyperopic readings than retinoscopy under cycloplegia. Additional refractions performed through binocular +3-D lenses did not facilitate detection of hyperopia. With the referral criteria above, 11% of the children were referred to an eye care specialist, but with a 20% false-positive rate. The screening had some power to identify children at risk but the number of false-negatives remained uncertain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17632312     DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3180dc99ea

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  7 in total

1.  Two-dimensional simulation of eccentric photorefraction images for ametropes: factors influencing the measurement.

Authors:  Yifei Wu; Larry N Thibos; T Rowan Candy
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Accuracy of noncycloplegic retinoscopy, retinomax autorefractor, and SureSight vision screener for detecting significant refractive errors.

Authors:  Marjean Taylor Kulp; Gui-Shuang Ying; Jiayan Huang; Maureen Maguire; Graham Quinn; Elise B Ciner; Lynn A Cyert; Deborah A Orel-Bixler; Bruce D Moore
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Accommodation and Phoria in Children Wearing Multifocal Contact Lenses.

Authors:  Celia R Gong; David Troilo; Kathryn Richdale
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  Is noncycloplegic photorefraction applicable for screening refractive amblyopia risk factors?

Authors:  Zhale Rajavi; Hiva Parsafar; Alireza Ramezani; Mehdi Yaseri
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2012-01

5.  A comparison of the Plusoptix S09 with an autorefractometer of noncycloplegics and cycloplegics in children.

Authors:  Jae Yon Won; Hye Young Shin; Su Young Kim; Young Chun Lee
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 6.  Scope and costs of autorefraction and photoscreening for childhood amblyopia-a systematic narrative review in relation to the EUSCREEN project data.

Authors:  Anna M Horwood; Helen J Griffiths; Jill Carlton; Paolo Mazzone; Arinder Channa; Mandy Nordmann; Huibert J Simonsz
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  Accuracy and Repeatability of Refractive Error Measurements by Photorefractometry.

Authors:  Zhale Rajavi; Hamideh Sabbaghi; Ahmad Shojaei Baghini; Mehdi Yaseri; Koroush Sheibani; Ghazal Norouzi
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.