Literature DB >> 17631068

Comparison of outcome in patients with ST-elevation versus non-ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Dynamic Registry).

J Dawn Abbott1, Hanna N Ahmed, Helen A Vlachos, Faith Selzer, David O Williams.   

Abstract

Patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-STEMI (NSTEMI) are increasingly being treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and we sought to determine risk of adverse outcomes by type of MI. Patients enrolled in the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Dynamic Registry from 1999 to 2004 who presented with an acute MI as an indication for PCI were studied. Baseline data and in-hospital and 1-year outcomes were compared based on ST-segment elevation (STEMI, n = 903; NSTEMI, n = 583) at presentation. Patients with STEMI were younger, had fewer co-morbidities, and had less extensive coronary artery disease than did patients with NSTEMI. Angiographic success and periprocedural complications were similar by MI type. In-hospital coronary artery bypass grafting, stroke, bleeding and recurrent MI were similar but mortality was higher in patients with STEMI (4.0% vs 1.4%, p = 0.004). Cardiogenic shock was associated with the greatest risk of in-hospital death (odds ratio 26.7, 95% confidence interval 11.4 to 62.3, p = 0.0001), but STEMI was also independently predictive of mortality. At 1 year, there was no influence of MI type on outcome. Age, cardiogenic shock, renal disease, peripheral vascular disease, and cancer were predictive of death and MI. Multivessel disease and a larger number of >50% lesions were associated with the need for repeat revascularization. In conclusion, STEMI was associated with a higher likelihood of in-hospital death than was NSTEMI, but long-term outcomes after PCI were independent of MI type. At 1 year, associated co-morbidities were strongly associated with death and MI, whereas only angiographic characteristics predicted the need for repeat revascularization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17631068     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.02.083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  27 in total

1.  Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging findings in non-ST-segment elevation versus ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing early invasive intervention.

Authors:  Jianqiang Xu; Young Bin Song; Joo-Yong Hahn; Sung-A Chang; Sang-Chol Lee; Yeon Hyeon Choe; Seung-Hyuk Choi; Jin-Ho Choi; Sang Hoon Lee; Jae K Oh; Hyeon-Cheol Gwon
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 2.357

2.  Should we improve the management of NSTEMI? Results from the population-based "acute myocardial infarction in Florence 2" (AMI-Florence 2) registry.

Authors:  Daniela Balzi; Mauro Di Bari; Alessandro Barchielli; Piercarlo Ballo; Nazario Carrabba; Antonella Cordisco; Maria Cristina Landini; Giovanni Maria Santoro; Serafina Valente; Alfredo Zuppiroli; Niccolò Marchionni; Gian Franco Gensini
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 3.397

3.  Primary percutaneous intervention of ST-elevation myocardial infarction in Austria: Results from the Austrian acute PCI registry 2005-2007.

Authors:  Jakob Dörler; Hannes Franz Alber; Johann Altenberger; Gerhard Bonner; Werner Benzer; Georg Grimm; Kurt Huber; Lalit Kaltenbach; Karl-Peter Pfeiffer; Herwig Schuchlenz; Peter Siostrzonek; Gerald Zenker; Otmar Pachinger; Franz Weidinger
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.704

4.  Recent trends in the incidence, treatment, and outcomes of patients with STEMI and NSTEMI.

Authors:  David D McManus; Joel Gore; Jorge Yarzebski; Frederick Spencer; Darleen Lessard; Robert J Goldberg
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.965

5.  Outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with cancer.

Authors:  Raymundo A Quintana; Dominique J Monlezun; Giovanni Davogustto; Humberto R Saenz; Francisco Lozano-Ruiz; Daisuke Sueta; Kenichi Tsujita; Uri Landes; Ali E Denktas; Mahboob Alam; David Paniagua; Daniel Addison; Hani Jneid
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2019-09-12       Impact factor: 4.164

Review 6.  Coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndrome: does every culprit lesion require revascularization?

Authors:  Sripal Bangalore; David P Faxon
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.931

7.  Incidence and distribution of occluded culprit arteries and impact of coronary collaterals on outcome in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and early invasive treatment strategy.

Authors:  Philipp Bahrmann; Justus Rach; Steffen Desch; Gerhard C Schuler; Holger Thiele
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2010-12-17       Impact factor: 5.460

8.  Actual Role of Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Receptor Inhibitors as Adjunctive Pharmacological Therapy to Primary Angioplasty in Acute Myocardial Infarction: In the Light of Recent Randomized Trials and Observational Studies with Bivalirudin.

Authors:  Osmar Antonio Centurión
Journal:  Open Cardiovasc Med J       Date:  2010-06-17

9.  Job insecurity and incident coronary heart disease: the Whitehall II prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Jane E Ferrie; Mika Kivimäki; Martin J Shipley; George Davey Smith; Marianna Virtanen
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 5.162

Review 10.  Arterial Thrombosis in Patients with Cancer.

Authors:  Mirela Tuzovic; Joerg Herrmann; Cezar Iliescu; Kostas Marmagkiolis; Boback Ziaeian; Eric H Yang
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-04-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.