Literature DB >> 17628597

Adverse effects associated with the use of porcine cross-linked collagen implants in an experimental model of incisional hernia repair.

Alexander H Petter-Puchner1, René H Fortelny, Nadja Walder, Rainer Mittermayr, Wolfgang Ohlinger, Martijn van Griensven, Heinz Redl.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Porcine cross-linked collagen (PermaCol, PCL; TSL, Aldershot, United Kingdom) has been proposed as permanent biomaterial in incisional hernia repair. We evaluated the biocompatibility of PCL in an established animal model.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: In 10 Sprague Dawley rats, two hernias per animal were created in the abdominal wall left and right of the linea alba (1.5 cm in diameter), and the peritoneum was spared. The lesions were left untreated for 10 days, until incisional hernias developed. These defects were covered with non-perforated (out-of-the-box, n = 12) or perforated (modified; n = 8) PCL (2 x 2 cm). In a first step, 12 non-perforated implants were tested in a short-term observation period of 17 days. Eight of these non-perforated implants were fibrin sealed (0.3 mL, Tissucol; Baxter, Vienna, Austria), whereas four non-perforated implants were sutured with non-resorbable material. In a second step, perforations were added as modification to PCL to facilitate drainage of fluids, cell ingrowth, and transgression of fibrin sealant. All perforated implants were fibrin sealed and included in a long-term observation period of 3 months. The observation periods allowed the evaluation of the complete degradation of the fibrin sealant fixation after 2 weeks and of the implant integration in a chronic timeframe. Implant sites were analyzed macroscopically and histologically.
RESULTS: All PCL samples elicited strong local inflammation with signs of foreign body reaction. Integration of perforated PCL appeared limited after 3 months. Three animals had to be euthanized prior to intended time points because of transcutaneous migration of implants.
CONCLUSIONS: In an experimental model of incisional hernia repair, PCL does not integrate well in the abdominal wall and shows poor biocompatibility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17628597     DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2007.03.090

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  20 in total

Review 1.  Current strategies and future perspectives for intraperitoneal adhesion prevention.

Authors:  Christoph Brochhausen; Volker H Schmitt; Constanze N E Planck; Taufiek K Rajab; David Hollemann; Christine Tapprich; Bernhard Krämer; Christian Wallwiener; Helmut Hierlemann; Rolf Zehbe; Heinrich Planck; C James Kirkpatrick
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Biologic hernia implants in experimental intraperitoneal onlay mesh plasty repair: the impact of proprietary collagen processing methods and fibrin sealant application on tissue integration.

Authors:  A H Petter-Puchner; R H Fortelny; K Silic; J Brand; S Gruber-Blum; H Redl
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-04-30       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Case-matched series of a non-cross-linked biologic versus non-absorbable mesh in laparoscopic ventral rectopexy.

Authors:  James W Ogilvie; Andrew R L Stevenson; Michael Powar
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Comparison of Permacol™ and Strattice™ for the repair of abdominal wall defects.

Authors:  K E Mulier; A H Nguyen; J P Delaney; S Marquez
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2011-01-15       Impact factor: 4.739

5.  Abdominal wall reinforcement: biologic vs. degradable synthetic devices.

Authors:  S Gruber-Blum; J Brand; C Keibl; R H Fortelny; H Redl; F Mayer; A H Petter-Puchner
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 4.739

6.  Early biocompatibility of crosslinked and non-crosslinked biologic meshes in a porcine model of ventral hernia repair.

Authors:  L Melman; E D Jenkins; N A Hamilton; L C Bender; M D Brodt; C R Deeken; S C Greco; M M Frisella; B D Matthews
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2011-01-08       Impact factor: 4.739

7.  Bacterial clearance of biologic grafts used in hernia repair: an experimental study.

Authors:  K C Harth; A-M Broome; M R Jacobs; J A Blatnik; F Zeinali; S Bajaksouzian; M J Rosen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  In-vivo and in-vitro histological evaluation of two commercially available acellular dermal matrices.

Authors:  J A Faleris; R M C Hernandez; D Wetzel; R Dodds; D C Greenspan
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2010-11-20       Impact factor: 4.739

9.  Rejection of Permacol mesh used in abdominal wall repair: a case report.

Authors:  Franchesca T Wotton; Jacob A Akoh
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-09-14       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Repair of abdominal wall defects with biodegradable laminar prostheses: polymeric or biological?

Authors:  Gemma Pascual; Sandra Sotomayor; Marta Rodríguez; Bárbara Pérez-Köhler; Juan M Bellón
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.