Literature DB >> 17627065

Biomarkers in cervical cancer screening.

Nicolas Wentzensen1, Magnus von Knebel Doeberitz.   

Abstract

In industrialized countries, population wide cytological screening programs using the Pap test have led to a substantial reduction of the incidence of cervical cancer. Despite this evident success, screening programs that rely on Pap-stained cytological samples have several limitations. First, a number of equivocal or mildly abnormal test results require costly work up by either repeated retesting or direct colposcopy and biopsy, since a certain percentage of high grade lesions that require immediate treatment hide among these unclear test results. This work up of mildly abnormal or equivocal cytological tests consumes a large amount of the overall costs spent for cervical cancer screening. Improved triage of these samples might substantially reduce the costs. Cervical cancer is induced by persistent infections with oncogenic human papilloma viruses (HPV). While HPV infection is an indispensable factor, it is not sufficient to cause cancer. The majority of acute HPV infections induce low grade precursor lesions that are cleared spontaneously after several months in more than 90% of cases, and less than 10% eventually progress to high grade lesions or invasive cancer. Progression is characterized by the deregulated expression of the viral oncogenes E6 and E7 in infected basal and parabasal cells. Novel biomarkers that allow monitoring these essential molecular events in histological or cytological specimens are likely to improve the detection of lesions that have a high risk of progression in both primary screening and triage settings. In this review, we will discuss potential biomarkers for cervical cancer screening with a focus on the level of clinical evidence that supports their application as novel markers in refined cervical cancer screening programs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17627065      PMCID: PMC3851733          DOI: 10.1155/2007/678793

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Markers        ISSN: 0278-0240            Impact factor:   3.434


  58 in total

Review 1.  Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer: biomarkers for improved prevention efforts.

Authors:  Vikrant V Sahasrabuddhe; Patricia Luhn; Nicolas Wentzensen
Journal:  Future Microbiol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.165

Review 2.  Human papillomavirus testing in the prevention of cervical cancer.

Authors:  Mark Schiffman; Nicolas Wentzensen; Sholom Wacholder; Walter Kinney; Julia C Gage; Philip E Castle
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  On-chip immunofluorescence analysis of single cervical cells using an electroactive microwell array with barrier for cervical screening.

Authors:  Makoto Takeuchi; Kazunori Nagasaka; Mina Yoshida; Yoshiko Kawata; Yuko Miyagawa; Saori Tago; Haruko Hiraike; Osamu Wada-Hiraike; Katsutoshi Oda; Yutaka Osuga; Tomoyuki Fujii; Takuya Ayabe; Soo Hyeon Kim; Teruo Fujii
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 2.800

Review 4.  Clinical implications of (epi)genetic changes in HPV-induced cervical precancerous lesions.

Authors:  Renske D M Steenbergen; Peter J F Snijders; Daniëlle A M Heideman; Chris J L M Meijer
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 60.716

5.  Claudin-1 as a Biomarker of Cervical Cytology and Histology.

Authors:  Márta Benczik; Ádám Galamb; Róbert Koiss; Attila Kovács; Balázs Járay; Tamás Székely; Tímea Szekerczés; Zsuzsa Schaff; Gábor Sobel; Csaba Jeney
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.201

Review 6.  Human papillomavirus DNA methylation as a potential biomarker for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Megan A Clarke; Nicolas Wentzensen; Lisa Mirabello; Arpita Ghosh; Sholom Wacholder; Ariana Harari; Attila Lorincz; Mark Schiffman; Robert D Burk
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Methylation of HPV18, HPV31, and HPV45 genomes and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3.

Authors:  Nicolas Wentzensen; Chang Sun; Arpita Ghosh; Walter Kinney; Lisa Mirabello; Sholom Wacholder; Ruth Shaber; Brandon LaMere; Megan Clarke; Attila T Lorincz; Philip E Castle; Mark Schiffman; Robert D Burk
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Optimizing technology for cervical cancer screening in high-resource settings.

Authors:  Lyndsay A Richardson; Joseph Tota; Eduardo L Franco
Journal:  Expert Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-05

9.  Functional validation of putative tumor suppressor gene C13ORF18 in cervical cancer by Artificial Transcription Factors.

Authors:  Christian Huisman; G Bea A Wisman; Hinke G Kazemier; Marcel A T M van Vugt; Ate G J van der Zee; Ed Schuuring; Marianne G Rots
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 6.603

Review 10.  Utility of methylation markers in cervical cancer early detection: appraisal of the state-of-the-science.

Authors:  Nicolas Wentzensen; Mark E Sherman; Mark Schiffman; Sophia S Wang
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 5.482

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.