Literature DB >> 17627050

Face recognition algorithms surpass humans matching faces over changes in illumination.

Alice J O'Toole1, P Jonathon Phillips, Fang Jiang, Janet Ayyad, Nils Penard, Hervé Abdi.   

Abstract

There has been significant progress in improving the performance of computer-based face recognition algorithms over the last decade. Although algorithms have been tested and compared extensively with each other, there has been remarkably little work comparing the accuracy of computer-based face recognition systems with humans. We compared seven state-of-the-art face recognition algorithms with humans on a facematching task. Humans and algorithms determined whether pairs of face images, taken under different illumination conditions, were pictures of the same person or of different people. Three algorithms surpassed human performance matching face pairs prescreened to be "difficult" and six algorithms surpassed humans on "easy" face pairs. Although illumination variation continues to challenge face recognition algorithms, current algorithms compete favorably with humans. The superior performance of the best algorithms over humans, in light of the absolute performance levels of the algorithms, underscores the need to compare algorithms with the best current control--humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17627050     DOI: 10.1109/TPAMI.2007.1107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell        ISSN: 0098-5589            Impact factor:   6.226


  14 in total

1.  Role of ordinal contrast relationships in face encoding.

Authors:  Sharon Gilad; Ming Meng; Pawan Sinha
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Multi-cultural cities reduce disadvantages in recognizing naturalistic images of other-race faces: evidence from a novel face learning task.

Authors:  Xiaomei Zhou; Catherine J Mondloch; Sarina Hui-Lin Chien; Margaret C Moulson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  How Different is Different? Criterion and Sensitivity in Face-Space.

Authors:  Harold Hill; Peter Claes; Michelle Corcoran; Mark Walters; Alan Johnston; John Gerald Clement
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-03-23

4.  Feedback training for facial image comparison.

Authors:  David White; Richard I Kemp; Rob Jenkins; A Mike Burton
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-02

5.  Seeing through disguise: Getting to know you with a deep convolutional neural network.

Authors:  Eilidh Noyes; Connor J Parde; Y Ivette Colón; Matthew Q Hill; Carlos D Castillo; Rob Jenkins; Alice J O'Toole
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2021-02-13

6.  Recognizing disguised faces: human and machine evaluation.

Authors:  Tejas Indulal Dhamecha; Richa Singh; Mayank Vatsa; Ajay Kumar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Integrating patient digital photographs with medical imaging examinations.

Authors:  Senthil Ramamurthy; Pamela Bhatti; Chesnal D Arepalli; Mohamed Salama; James M Provenzale; Srini Tridandapani
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 8.  Face Recognition by Humans and Machines: Three Fundamental Advances from Deep Learning.

Authors:  Alice J O'Toole; Carlos D Castillo
Journal:  Annu Rev Vis Sci       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 7.745

9.  Toward a unified model of face and object recognition in the human visual system.

Authors:  Guy Wallis
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-08-15

10.  Person identification from aerial footage by a remote-controlled drone.

Authors:  Markus Bindemann; Matthew C Fysh; Sophie S K Sage; Kristina Douglas; Hannah M Tummon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.