BACKGROUND: Mammographic density, the light/white radiographic appearance on a mammogram that represents connective and epithelial tissue, is a strong risk factor for breast cancer which seems to be highly heritable. Little is known about its genetic determinants. METHODS: We studied 457 women from 207 sisterhoods (104 monozygotic twins, 182 dizygotic twins, and 171 singletons). Percentage mammographic density (PMD) as well as dense area and nondense area were calculated using a computer-assisted method. We measured six single nucleotide polymorphisms from six candidate genes (COMT, HSD3B1, IGFBP3, HER2, XPD, and XRCC3). Associations between genotypes and mammographic measures were tested (a) cross-sectionally using a multivariate normal model fitted using FISHER that allowed separate correlations for monozygotic, dizygotic, and nontwin pairs and (b) within sister pairs using paired t tests. RESULTS: Cross-sectionally, each additional copy of the HSD3B1 Asn(367)Thr variant allele was associated with lower PMD (-3.47% per allele; SE = 1.65; P = 0.035). Within-pair regression estimates confirmed this association. There was no evidence for an association between the mammographic density measures and any of the other variants studied. CONCLUSION: We have replicated an association between a variant in the HSD3B1 gene and PMD, which suggests that HSD3B1 may be genetic determinant of mammographic density.
BACKGROUND: Mammographic density, the light/white radiographic appearance on a mammogram that represents connective and epithelial tissue, is a strong risk factor for breast cancer which seems to be highly heritable. Little is known about its genetic determinants. METHODS: We studied 457 women from 207 sisterhoods (104 monozygotic twins, 182 dizygotic twins, and 171 singletons). Percentage mammographic density (PMD) as well as dense area and nondense area were calculated using a computer-assisted method. We measured six single nucleotide polymorphisms from six candidate genes (COMT, HSD3B1, IGFBP3, HER2, XPD, and XRCC3). Associations between genotypes and mammographic measures were tested (a) cross-sectionally using a multivariate normal model fitted using FISHER that allowed separate correlations for monozygotic, dizygotic, and nontwin pairs and (b) within sister pairs using paired t tests. RESULTS: Cross-sectionally, each additional copy of the HSD3B1Asn(367)Thr variant allele was associated with lower PMD (-3.47% per allele; SE = 1.65; P = 0.035). Within-pair regression estimates confirmed this association. There was no evidence for an association between the mammographic density measures and any of the other variants studied. CONCLUSION: We have replicated an association between a variant in the HSD3B1 gene and PMD, which suggests that HSD3B1 may be genetic determinant of mammographic density.
Authors: M Lillholm; A Ghosh; P C Pettersen; M de Bruijne; E B Dam; M A Karsdal; C Christiansen; H K Genant; M Nielsen Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2010-11-11 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Jingmei Li; Louise Eriksson; Keith Humphreys; Kamila Czene; Jianjun Liu; Rulla M Tamimi; Sara Lindström; David J Hunter; Celine M Vachon; Fergus J Couch; Christopher G Scott; Pagona Lagiou; Per Hall Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2010-03-09 Impact factor: 6.466
Authors: Celia M T Greenwood; Andrew D Paterson; Linda Linton; Irene L Andrulis; Carmel Apicella; Apostolos Dimitromanolakis; Valentina Kriukov; Lisa J Martin; Ayesha Salleh; Elena Samiltchuk; Rashmi V Parekh; Melissa C Southey; Esther M John; John L Hopper; Norman F Boyd; Johanna M Rommens Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2011-12-21 Impact factor: 6.466
Authors: Brad M Keller; Anne Marie McCarthy; Jinbo Chen; Katrina Armstrong; Emily F Conant; Susan M Domchek; Despina Kontos Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2015-03-18 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: F N Fjeldheim; H Frydenberg; V G Flote; A McTiernan; A-S Furberg; P T Ellison; E S Barrett; T Wilsgaard; G Jasienska; G Ursin; E A Wist; I Thune Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2016-10-07 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Ali Ozhand; Eunjung Lee; Anna H Wu; Merete Ellingjord-Dale; Lars A Akslen; Roberta McKean-Cowdin; Giske Ursin Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-06-07 Impact factor: 3.240