Literature DB >> 12954395

Effects of a reward downshift on the consummatory behavior and flower choices of bumblebee foragers.

Daniel D Wiegmann1, Douglas A Wiegmann, Faith A Waldron.   

Abstract

Insect foragers often exhibit flower constancy, the tendency to visit single flower types rather than sample alternative flowers that provide equal or higher levels of reward. We employed a negative incentive contrast procedure to examine whether a decrease of sucrose concentration in a regularly visited flower type affects bumblebee (Bombus impatiens) consummatory or choice behavior. Subjects were trained to enter a test arena where they foraged on a single, red, artificial flower that contained 140 microl of sucrose solution. Subjects were reinforced with a concentration of either 0.50 or 0.20 sucrose solution in 20 trials and in 12 subsequent test trials subjects were given a choice between a red and yellow flower that each contained 140 microl of 0.20 sucrose solution. Subjects that experienced a downshift of reward showed an abrupt disruption in consumption of sucrose solution from the red flower. These subjects were also significantly more likely to visit the novel yellow flower than subjects that were reinforced with 0.20 sucrose solution in red flowers in all trials. However, the effects of the downshift of reward were transient and appeared to disrupt consummatory behavior more strongly than flower preferences. These results support the idea that bumblebee foragers form expectations of reward in flowers--as is implied by the results of studies of honeybees--and suggest that unrealized expectations of reward may cause foragers to sample alternative flowers or to fly considerable distances in search of particular types of flowers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12954395     DOI: 10.1016/s0031-9384(03)00122-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  5 in total

Review 1.  Uncertainty processing in bees exposed to free choices: Lessons from vertebrates.

Authors:  Patrick Anselme
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-12

2.  Label-based expectations affect incentive contrast effects in bumblebees.

Authors:  Claire T Hemingway; Felicity Muth
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 3.812

3.  Learning reward expectations in honeybees.

Authors:  Mariana Gil; Rodrigo J De Marco; Randolf Menzel
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2007-07-12       Impact factor: 2.460

4.  Inbreeding in Mimulus guttatus reduces visitation by bumble bee pollinators.

Authors:  David E Carr; T'ai H Roulston; Haley Hart
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Irrational risk aversion in an ant.

Authors:  Massimo De Agrò; Daniel Grimwade; Richard Bach; Tomer J Czaczkes
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 3.084

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.