Literature DB >> 17626477

Molecular detection and differentiation of infectious bursal disease virus.

Ching Ching Wu1, Peter Rubinelli, Tsang Long Lin.   

Abstract

Vaccination of hens, with the subsequent maternal immunity imparted to chicks, is the primary means of controlling infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV). Effective vaccination depends on rapid and accurate diagnosis of the subtype present in a flock because vaccines based on the classic subtype of IBDV can fail to protect against challenge with a variant subtype. This review describes the various methods available to detect and differentiate between IBDV subtypes. Serotype 1 IBDV causes economically significant immunosuppressive disease in young chickens. Within serotype 1, two subtypes, classic and variant, can be differentiated by the virus neutralization assay. Antigen capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (AC-ELISA) with MAbs has been successful at differentiating the very virulent IBDV phenotype (vvIBDV) from less pathogenic types. More rapid and sensitive molecular diagnostic methods based on reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for amplification of the IBDV VP2 gene have been a major focus of investigation in recent years. Conventional RT-PCR has been useful in detecting IBDV serotypes and, to a lesser extent, differentiating IBDV subtypes. One of the approaches has been the use of SspI and NgoM IV restriction enzymes, for restriction endonuclease (RE) analysis of RT-PCR products (RT-PCR-RE) and BstNI and MboI for restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis (RT-PCR-RFLP) to find unique banding patterns associated with antigenic variation within the variable region of the IBDV VP2 protein. However, these approaches were ultimately found to be unreliable because subtypes could not be consistently distinguished with restriction enzymes. These limitations led to studies in differentiating subtypes by detection of single nucleotide differences in sequence through real-time RT-PCR or DNA sequencing of RT-PCR products. Conventional RT-PCR, amplifying the VP2 hypervariable region, in combination with DNA sequencing of the PCR product, can differentiate classic, variant, and vvIBDV strains because variant and vvIBDV have characteristic nucleotide and amino acid substitutions. Real-time RT-PCR, targeting different regions of the IBDV genome, including VP1, VP2, and VP4 genes, in conjunction with melting-curve analysis is being investigated as a promising tool for molecular diagnosis of IBDV infection. These methods potentially allow for more rapid, sensitive, and specific detection and differentiation of IBDV classic, very virulent, and variant subtypes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17626477     DOI: 10.1637/0005-2086(2007)51[515:MDADOI]2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Avian Dis        ISSN: 0005-2086            Impact factor:   1.577


  7 in total

1.  DNA nanotechnology for nucleic acid analysis: DX motif-based sensor.

Authors:  Dmitry M Kolpashchikov; Yulia V Gerasimova; Mohammad S Khan
Journal:  Chembiochem       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 3.164

2.  Sequence variability and evolution of the terminal overlapping VP5 gene of the infectious bursal disease virus.

Authors:  Martín Hernández; Pedro Villegas; Diego Hernández; Alejandro Banda; Leticia Maya; Valeria Romero; Gonzalo Tomás; Ruben Pérez
Journal:  Virus Genes       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 2.332

3.  Infectious bursal disease: outbreak investigation, molecular characterization, and vaccine immunogenicity trial in Ethiopia.

Authors:  Aregitu Mekuriaw; Molalegne Bitew; Esyas Gelaye; Bedaso Mamo; Gelagay Ayelet
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 1.559

4.  Characterization of variant infectious bursal disease virus from a broiler farm in Japan using immunized sentinel chickens.

Authors:  Kenichi Yamazaki; Hideyuki Ohta; Toru Kawai; Tsuyoshi Yamaguchi; Takeshi Obi; Kozo Takase
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 1.267

5.  Development of multiplex reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction for differentiation of strains of infectious bursal disease virus and primary screening of the virus in Thailand.

Authors:  Nataya Charoenvisal
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2021-12-14

6.  Partial VP1 sequencing of Brazilian infectious bursal disease virus strains.

Authors:  Maria Judite Bittencourt Fernandes; Isabela Cristina Simoni; Ricardo Harakava; Eliana Borges Rivas; Clarice Weis Arns
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 2.476

7.  Genetic characterisation of infectious bursal disease virus isolates in Ethiopia.

Authors:  Shiferaw Jenberie; Stacey E Lynch; Fekadu Kebede; Robert M Christley; Esayas Gelaye; Haileleul Negussie; Kassahun Asmare; Gelagay Ayelet
Journal:  Acta Trop       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 3.112

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.