Literature DB >> 17624959

On the electrodetection threshold of aquatic vertebrates with ampullary or mucous gland electroreceptor organs.

Rob C Peters1, Lonneke B M Eeuwes, Franklin Bretschneider.   

Abstract

Reinterpretation of research on the electric sense in aquatic organisms with ampullary organs results in the following conclusions. The detection limit of limnic vertebrates with ampullary organs is 1 microV cm(-1), and of marine fish is 20 nV cm(-1). Angular movements are essential for stimulation of the ampullary system in uniform d.c. fields. Angular movements in the geomagnetic field also generate induction voltages, which exceed the 20 nV cm(-1) limit in marine fish. As a result, marine electrosensitive fish are sensitive to motion in the geomagnetic field, whereas limnic fish are not. Angular swimming movements generate a.c. stimuli, which act like the noise in a stochastic resonance system, and result in a detection threshold in marine organisms as low as 1 nV cm(-1). Fish in the benthic space are exposed to stronger electric stimuli than fish in the pelagic space. Benthic fish scan the orientation plane for the maximum potential difference with their raster of electroreceptor organs, in order to locate bioelectric prey. This behaviour explains why the detection threshold does not depend on fish size. Pelagic marine fish are mainly exposed to electric fields caused by movements in the geomagnetic field. The straight orientation courses found in certain shark species might indicate that the electric sense functions as a simple bisensor system. Symmetrical stimulation of the sensory raster would provide an easy way to keep a straight course with respect to a far-field stimulus. The same neural mechanism would be effective in the location of a bioelectric prey generating a near-field stimulus. The response criteria in conditioning experiments and in experiments with spontaneous reactions are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17624959     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2007.00015.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc        ISSN: 0006-3231


  10 in total

1.  Electroreception in the Guiana dolphin (Sotalia guianensis).

Authors:  Nicole U Czech-Damal; Alexander Liebschner; Lars Miersch; Gertrud Klauer; Frederike D Hanke; Christopher Marshall; Guido Dehnhardt; Wolf Hanke
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Navigation by induction-based magnetoreception in elasmobranch fishes.

Authors:  T C A Molteno; W L Kennedy
Journal:  J Biophys       Date:  2009-10-18

Review 3.  Passive electroreception in aquatic mammals.

Authors:  Nicole U Czech-Damal; Guido Dehnhardt; Paul Manger; Wolf Hanke
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Magnetic characterization of isolated candidate vertebrate magnetoreceptor cells.

Authors:  Stephan H K Eder; Hervé Cadiou; Airina Muhamad; Peter A McNaughton; Joseph L Kirschvink; Michael Winklhofer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Spike-interval triggered averaging reveals a quasi-periodic spiking alternative for stochastic resonance in catfish electroreceptors.

Authors:  Martin J M Lankheet; P Christiaan Klink; Bart G Borghuis; André J Noest
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Exploiting common senses: sensory ecology meets wildlife conservation and management.

Authors:  Laura K Elmer; Christine L Madliger; Daniel T Blumstein; Chris K Elvidge; Esteban Fernández-Juricic; Andrij Z Horodysky; Nicholas S Johnson; Liam P McGuire; Ronald R Swaisgood; Steven J Cooke
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 3.079

7.  Root electrotropism in Arabidopsis does not depend on auxin distribution but requires cytokinin biosynthesis.

Authors:  Maddalena Salvalaio; Nicholas Oliver; Deniz Tiknaz; Maximillian Schwarze; Nicolas Kral; Soo-Jeong Kim; Giovanni Sena
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 8.340

8.  Electric field detection in sawfish and shovelnose rays.

Authors:  Barbara E Wueringer; Lyle Squire; Stephen M Kajiura; Ian R Tibbetts; Nathan S Hart; Shaun P Collin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  C. elegans Demonstrates Distinct Behaviors within a Fixed and Uniform Electric Field.

Authors:  Steven D Chrisman; Christopher B Waite; Alison G Scoville; Lucinda Carnell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  High magnetic field induced otolith fusion in the zebrafish larvae.

Authors:  Patricia Pais-Roldán; Ajeet Pratap Singh; Hildegard Schulz; Xin Yu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.