Literature DB >> 17624434

Risk assessment for ectasia after corneal refractive surgery.

J Bradley Randleman1, Maria Woodward, Michael J Lynn, R Doyle Stulting.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To analyze the epidemiologic features of ectasia after excimer laser corneal refractive surgery, to identify risk factors for its development, and to devise a screening strategy to minimize its occurrence.
DESIGN: Retrospective comparative and case-control study. PARTICIPANTS: All cases of ectasia after excimer laser corneal refractive surgery published in the English language with adequate information available through December 2005, unpublished cases seeking treatment at the authors' institution from 1998 through 2005, and a contemporaneous control group who underwent uneventful LASIK and experienced a normal postoperative course.
METHODS: Evaluation of preoperative characteristics, including patient age, gender, spherical equivalent refraction, pachymetry, and topographic patterns; perioperative characteristics, including type of surgery performed, flap thickness, ablation depth, and residual stromal bed (RSB) thickness; and postoperative characteristics including time to onset of ectasia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Development of postoperative corneal ectasia.
RESULTS: There were 171 ectasia cases, including 158 published cases and 13 unpublished cases evaluated at the authors' institution. Ectasia occurred after LASIK in 164 cases (95.9%) and after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in 7 cases (4.1%). Compared with controls, more ectasia cases had abnormal preoperative topographies (35.7% vs. 0%; P<1.0x10(-15)), were significantly younger (34.4 vs. 40.0 years; P<1.0x10(-7)), were more myopic (-8.53 vs. -5.09 diopters; P<1.0x10(-7)), had thinner corneas before surgery (521.0 vs. 546.5 microm; P<1.0x10(-7)), and had less RSB thickness (256.3 vs. 317.3 microm; P<1.0x10(-10)). Based on subgroup logistic regression analysis, abnormal topography was the most significant factor that discriminated cases from controls, followed by RSB thickness, age, and preoperative corneal thickness, in that order. A risk factor stratification scale was created, taking all recognized risk factors into account in a weighted fashion. This model had a specificity of 91% and a sensitivity of 96% in this series.
CONCLUSIONS: A quantitative method can be used to identify eyes at risk for developing ectasia after LASIK that, if validated, represents a significant improvement over current screening strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17624434     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.03.073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  140 in total

Review 1.  [Complications of corneal lamellar refractive surgery].

Authors:  T Kohnen; M Remy
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  In-vivo corneal biomechanical analysis of unilateral keratoconus.

Authors:  Orhan Ayar; Mehmet Cuneyt Ozmen; Orkun Muftuoglu; Mehmet Orcun Akdemir; Mustafa Koc; Kemal Ozulken
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Blade source effect on laser in situ keratomileusis flap thickness with the Amadeus I microkeratome.

Authors:  Adrienne L Ruth; Michael J Lynn; J Bradley Randleman; R Doyle Stulting
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.351

4.  [Avoidance and management of complications in laser in situ keratomileusis].

Authors:  T Kohnen; O K Klaproth
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  A Large-Scale Computational Analysis of Corneal Structural Response and Ectasia Risk in Myopic Laser Refractive Surgery.

Authors:  William Joseph Dupps; Ibrahim Seven
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2016-08

6.  Videokeratoscopic indices in relation to epidemiological exposure to keratoconus.

Authors:  Jose Luis Mato; Isabel Lema; Elío Díez-Feijoo
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-03-07       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Ectasia risk: a multifactorial conundrum.

Authors:  William J Dupps
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.351

Review 8.  Biomechanics of corneal ectasia and biomechanical treatments.

Authors:  Cynthia J Roberts; William J Dupps
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 3.351

9.  Femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK versus PRK for high myopia: comparison of 18-month visual acuity and quality.

Authors:  Hassan Hashemi; Reza Ghaffari; Mohammad Miraftab; Soheila Asgari
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 2.031

10.  [Collagen crosslinking with riboflavin and UVA-light in keratoconus].

Authors:  M Kohlhaas
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.