Literature DB >> 17623839

Integrating statistical pair potentials into protein complex prediction.

Julian Mintseris1, Brian Pierce, Kevin Wiehe, Robert Anderson, Rong Chen, Zhiping Weng.   

Abstract

The biophysical study of protein-protein interactions and docking has important implications in our understanding of most complex cellular signaling processes. Most computational approaches to protein docking involve a tradeoff between the level of detail incorporated into the model and computational power required to properly handle that level of detail. In this work, we seek to optimize that balance by showing that we can reduce the complexity of model representation and thus make the computation tractable with minimal loss of predictive performance. We also introduce a pair-wise statistical potential suitable for docking that builds on previous work and show that this potential can be incorporated into our fast fourier transform-based docking algorithm ZDOCK. We use the Protein Docking Benchmark to illustrate the improved performance of this potential compared with less detailed other scoring functions. Furthermore, we show that the new potential performs well on antibody-antigen complexes, with most predictions clustering around the Complementarity Determining Regions of antibodies without any manual intervention. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17623839     DOI: 10.1002/prot.21502

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  124 in total

1.  Prediction of protein-protein binding free energies.

Authors:  Thom Vreven; Howook Hwang; Brian G Pierce; Zhiping Weng
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Modeling the binding of three toxins to the voltage-gated potassium channel (Kv1.3).

Authors:  Rong Chen; Anna Robinson; Dan Gordon; Shin-Ho Chung
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Binding modes of μ-conotoxin to the bacterial sodium channel (NaVAb).

Authors:  Rong Chen; Shin-Ho Chung
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 4.  Flexibility and binding affinity in protein-ligand, protein-protein and multi-component protein interactions: limitations of current computational approaches.

Authors:  Pierre Tuffery; Philippe Derreumaux
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Templates are available to model nearly all complexes of structurally characterized proteins.

Authors:  Petras J Kundrotas; Zhengwei Zhu; Joël Janin; Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  DARS (Decoys As the Reference State) potentials for protein-protein docking.

Authors:  Gwo-Yu Chuang; Dima Kozakov; Ryan Brenke; Stephen R Comeau; Sandor Vajda
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 7.  Convergence and combination of methods in protein-protein docking.

Authors:  Sandor Vajda; Dima Kozakov
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 6.809

8.  Evaluating template-based and template-free protein-protein complex structure prediction.

Authors:  Thom Vreven; Howook Hwang; Brian G Pierce; Zhiping Weng
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 11.622

Review 9.  Sampling and scoring: a marriage made in heaven.

Authors:  Sandor Vajda; David R Hall; Dima Kozakov
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2013-08-19

10.  Identification of the major ubiquitin-binding domain of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa ExoU A2 phospholipase.

Authors:  David M Anderson; Jimmy B Feix; Andrew L Monroe; Francis C Peterson; Brian F Volkman; Arthur L Haas; Dara W Frank
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 5.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.