Literature DB >> 17623690

In vitro susceptibilities to yeasts using the ATB FUNGUS 2 method, compared with Sensititre Yeast One and standard CLSI (NCCLS) M27-A2 methods.

Josep M Torres-Rodríguez1, Eidi Alvarado-Ramírez.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The microbroth ATB FUNGUS 2 (ATBF2) method (bioMérieux, La Balme-les Grottes, France), designed for in vitro determination of the susceptibility of Candida spp. and Cryptococcus neoformans to antifungal agents, was evaluated with 100 yeasts and compared with Sensititre Yeast One (SYO; Trek Diagnostic Systems, UK), considering CLSI M27-A2 as the reference method.
METHODS: ATBF2 consists of ready-to-use strips including amphotericin B (AMB), 5-flucytosine, fluconazole and itraconazole for MIC determinations. Reproducibility of ATBF2 was determined. Two quality control strains and a panel of eight Candida isolates were tested five different times with the three methods. The essential agreements within +/-2 log2 dilution between the ATBF2, SYO and M27-A2 methods were assessed. The yeast clinical isolates included were nine species of Candida (n = 80) and C. neoformans (n = 20).
RESULTS: Inter- and intra-laboratory reproducibility, tested with the Candida panel, was >or=99%. MICs for the ATCC strains were within the expected ranges with the three methods. Visual and automated readings of ATBF2 presented good concordance, being lower with itraconazole. The overall essential agreements with the M27-A2 method were 94% and 99% for automated ATBF2 and visual ATBF2 readings, respectively. For SYO, the agreement was 91%. Percentages of agreements by drugs (automated ATBF2/visual ATBF2/SYO) were: 5-flucytosine, 97/100/90; AMB, 97/100/85; fluconazole, 93/97/95; and itraconazole, 89/98/95. Disagreement was higher between M27-A2 and SYO than between M27-A2 and ATBF2.
CONCLUSIONS: ATBF2 is an objective, reproducible and simple method for the accurate determination of MICs of the most common antifungal drugs in yeasts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17623690     DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkm247

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  7 in total

1.  In Vitro Susceptibility Testing in Fungi: What is its Role in Clinical Practice?

Authors:  Susanne Perkhofer; Cornelia Mrazek; Lukas Hartl; Cornelia Lass-Flörl
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.725

2.  Epidemiology, species distribution, and outcome of nosocomial Candida spp. bloodstream infection in Shanghai: an 11-year retrospective analysis in a tertiary care hospital.

Authors:  Yan-Jun Zheng; Ting Xie; Er-Zhen Chen; Zhi-Tao Yang; Lin Wu; Xiao-Ying Liu; Ling Zhu; Ying Chen; En-Qiang Mao; Li-Zhong Han
Journal:  Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 3.944

Review 3.  Candidemia in children after complex congenital heart defects surgery treated with caspofungin--our own experience and a review of literature.

Authors:  Radoslaw Jaworski; Ninela Irga; Ireneusz Haponiuk; Maciej Chojnicki; Elzbieta Arlukowicz; Mariusz Steffek; Mariusz Sroka; Katarzyna Gierat-Haponiuk; Jacek Juscinski; Lucyna Palkowska; Aneta Sendrowska; Wojciech Kosiak
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2011-05

4.  The widely used ATB FUNGUS 3 automated readings in China and its misleading high MICs of Candida spp. to azoles: challenges for developing countries' clinical microbiology labs.

Authors:  Li Zhang; He Wang; Meng Xiao; Timothy Kudinha; Lei-Li Mao; Hao-Ran Zhao; Fanrong Kong; Ying-Chun Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Comparison of the Sensititre YeastOne antifungal method with the CLSI M27-A3 reference method to determine the activity of antifungal agents against clinical isolates of Candidaspp.

Authors:  Rabiye Altinbaş; Ayşe Barış; Sümeyye Şen; Recep Öztürk; Nuri Kiraz
Journal:  Turk J Med Sci       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 0.973

6.  The Scent of Antifungal Propolis.

Authors:  Zsigmond Papp; Sarra Bouchelaghem; András Szekeres; Réka Meszéna; Zoltán Gyöngyi; Gábor Papp
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-27       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 7.  Commercial Methods for Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Yeasts: Strengths and Limitations as Predictors of Resistance.

Authors:  Ana Espinel-Ingroff
Journal:  J Fungi (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-17
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.