Literature DB >> 17621598

Evaluation of corrected flow time in oesophageal Doppler as a predictor of fluid responsiveness.

J-H Lee1, J-T Kim, S Z Yoon, Y-J Lim, Y Jeon, J-H Bahk, C S Kim.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Corrected flow time (FTc) by oesophageal Doppler is considered to be a 'static' preload index. We evaluated the ability of FTc to predict fluid responsiveness and compared this with the abilities of other preload indices, such as pulse pressure variation (PPV), central venous pressure (CVP), and left ventricular end-diastolic area index (LVEDAI).
METHODS: Twenty neurosurgical patients were studied. After induction of anaesthesia, FTc, PPV, LVEDAI, CVP, and stroke volume index (SVI) were measured before and 12 min after fluid loading with 6% hydroxyethyl starch solution (7 ml kg(-1)). Responders and non-responders were defined as those patients with an SVI increase >or= 10% or < 10% after fluid loading, respectively. Pearson's correlation was used to assess correlations between changes in SVI and initial haemodynamic variables. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed and compared to evaluate the overall performance of preload indices (FTc, PPV, LVEDAI, and CVP) in terms of predicting fluid responsiveness.
RESULTS: FTc and PPV before fluid loading differed between responders (n = 11) and non-responders (n = 9), and correlated with changes in SVI (r = -0.515 and r = 0.696, respectively), which was opposite to that observed for CVP or LVEDAI. Areas under ROC curves for FTc [0.944 (SD 0.058)] and PPV [0.909 (0.069)] were significantly greater than those for CVP [0.540 (0.133), P < 0.001] and LVEDAI [0.495 (0.133), P < 0.001]. The optimal threshold value given by ROC analysis was 357 ms for FTc.
CONCLUSIONS: In this study, FTc predicted fluid responsiveness. However, FTc should be used in conjunction with other clinical information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17621598     DOI: 10.1093/bja/aem179

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  17 in total

1.  A validation study of electrical cardiometry in pregnant patients using transthoracic echocardiography as the reference standard.

Authors:  Erin Martin; Adanna Anyikam; Jerasimos Ballas; Kristen Buono; Kristin Mantell; Thao Huynh-Covey; Thomas Archer
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Ultrasound Assessment of the Change in Carotid Corrected Flow Time in Fluid Responsiveness in Undifferentiated Shock.

Authors:  Igor Barjaktarevic; William E Toppen; Scott Hu; Elizabeth Aquije Montoya; Stephanie Ong; Russell Buhr; Ian J David; Tisha Wang; Talayeh Rezayat; Steven Y Chang; David Elashoff; Daniela Markovic; David Berlin; Maxime Cannesson
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 7.598

3.  Additional hemodynamic measurements with an esophageal Doppler monitor: a preliminary report of compliance, force, kinetic energy, and afterload in the clinical setting.

Authors:  Glen Atlas; David Brealey; Sunil Dhar; Gerhard Dikta; Meryvn Singer
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  Evaluating corrected carotid flow time as a non-invasive parameter for trending cardiac output and stroke volume in cardiac surgery patients.

Authors:  Joris van Houte; Anniek E Raaijmaakers; Frederik J Mooi; Loek P B Meijs; Esmée C de Boer; Irene Suriani; Saskia Houterman; Leon J Montenij; Arthur R Bouwman
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2022-04-09

5.  A new modality for the estimation of corrected flow time via electrocardiography as an alternative to Doppler ultrasonography.

Authors:  Hooman Hossein-Nejad; Payam Mohammadinejad; Atefeh Zeinoddini; Seyedhossein Seyedhosseini Davarani; Mohsen Banaie
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2017-04-22       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 6.  Systematic review including re-analyses of 1148 individual data sets of central venous pressure as a predictor of fluid responsiveness.

Authors:  T G Eskesen; M Wetterslev; A Perner
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Transoesophageal Doppler monitoring for fluid and hemodynamic treatment during lung surgery.

Authors:  John Diaper; Christoph Ellenberger; Yann Villiger; John Robert; Jean-Marie Tschopp; Marc Licker
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2008-10-19       Impact factor: 2.502

8.  The correlation between the Trendelenburg position and the stroke volume variation.

Authors:  Jin Hye Min; Sang Eun Lee; Hong Sik Lee; Young Keun Chae; Yong Kyung Lee; Yoo Kang; Ui Jin Je
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2014-12-29

9.  Transoesophageal Doppler compared to central venous pressure for perioperative hemodynamic monitoring and fluid guidance in liver resection.

Authors:  Osama A El Sharkawy; Emad K Refaat; Abdel Elmoniem M Ibraheem; Wafiya R Mahdy; Nirmeen A Fayed; Wesam S Mourad; Hanaa S Abd Elhafez; Khaled A Yassen
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2013-10

Review 10.  Assessing volume status and fluid responsiveness in the emergency department.

Authors:  David C Mackenzie; Vicki E Noble
Journal:  Clin Exp Emerg Med       Date:  2014-12-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.