Literature DB >> 17621468

Multiple imputation: current perspectives.

Michael G Kenward1, James Carpenter.   

Abstract

This paper provides an overview of multiple imputation and current perspectives on its use in medical research. We begin with a brief review of the problem of handling missing data in general and place multiple imputation in this context, emphasizing its relevance for longitudinal clinical trials and observational studies with missing covariates. We outline how multiple imputation proceeds in practice and then sketch its rationale. We explore the problem of obtaining proper imputations in some detail and distinguish two main classes of approach, methods based on fully multivariate models, and those that iterate conditional univariate models. We show how the use of so-called uncongenial imputation models are particularly valuable for sensitivity analyses and also for certain analyses in clinical trial settings. We also touch upon other forms of sensitivity analysis that use multiple imputation. Finally, we give some open questions that the increasing use of multiple imputation has thrown up, which we believe are useful directions for future research.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17621468     DOI: 10.1177/0962280206075304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res        ISSN: 0962-2802            Impact factor:   3.021


  126 in total

1.  Reporting recommendations for tumor marker prognostic studies (REMARK): explanation and elaboration.

Authors:  Douglas G Altman; Lisa M McShane; Willi Sauerbrei; Sheila E Taube
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 8.775

2.  Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies (REMARK): explanation and elaboration.

Authors:  Douglas G Altman; Lisa M McShane; Willi Sauerbrei; Sheila E Taube
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 11.069

3.  A latent-variable marginal method for multi-level incomplete binary data.

Authors:  Baojiang Chen; Xiao-Hua Zhou
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Much ado about nothing: A comparison of missing data methods and software to fit incomplete data regression models.

Authors:  Nicholas J Horton; Ken P Kleinman
Journal:  Am Stat       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 8.710

5.  Psychometric properties of the patient activation measure among multimorbid older adults.

Authors:  Richard L Skolasky; Ariel Frank Green; Daniel Scharfstein; Chad Boult; Lisa Reider; Stephen T Wegener
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  A preliminary study of active compared with passive imputation of missing body mass index values among non-Hispanic white youths.

Authors:  David A Wagstaff; Sibylle Kranz; Ofer Harel
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 7.045

7.  When it is better to estimate a slope with only one point.

Authors:  R Thiébaut; S Walker
Journal:  QJM       Date:  2008-08-08

8.  A Likelihood-Based Approach for Missing Genotype Data.

Authors:  Gina M D'Angelo; M Ilyas Kamboh; Eleanor Feingold
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 0.444

9.  Missing Data Methods for Partial Correlations.

Authors:  Gina M D'Angelo; Jingqin Luo; Chengjie Xiong
Journal:  J Biom Biostat       Date:  2012-12

10.  A note on compatibility for inference with missing data in the presence of auxiliary covariates.

Authors:  Michael J Daniels; Xuan Luo
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2018-11-18       Impact factor: 2.373

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.