Literature DB >> 17620529

Practitioner-level determinants of inappropriate prostate-specific antigen screening.

B Price Kerfoot1, Erika F Holmberg, Elizabeth V Lawler, Edward Krupat, Paul R Conlin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: None of the major clinical practice guidelines recommend that prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening be routinely performed in asymptomatic men older than 75 years or younger than 40 years. We investigated the practitioner-level determinants of inappropriate PSA screening in 7 Veterans Health Administration (VHA) hospitals.
METHODS: Data on PSA test use from 1997 to 2004 were obtained from VHA databases for 181 139 male patients and the 4823 health care providers who ordered their tests. Patients were excluded from the study population if they underwent PSA testing for nonscreening reasons, as indicated by prostate cancer-specific medications, diagnoses, and procedures. Inappropriate PSA test use was defined as PSA screening in patients older than 75 years or younger than 40 years. Univariate and multivariate Poisson regressions were performed.
RESULTS: The mean +/- SD percentage of inappropriate tests by health care provider was 19.3% +/- 15.0%, with 18.4% +/- 14.9% in patients older than 75 years and 0.8% +/- 3.0% in patients younger than 40 years. Practitioners who were urology specialists, male, infrequent PSA test orderers, and affiliated with specific hospitals had significantly higher levels of inappropriate PSA screening. Compared with attending physicians, nurses and physician assistants had significantly lower levels of inappropriate screening. Under multivariate modeling, infrequent PSA test ordering and hospital affiliation retained statistical significance. The percentage of inappropriate PSA screening increased significantly with the age of male health care providers (P<.001).
CONCLUSIONS: This study elucidates several important provider-level determinants of PSA screening misuse and substantiates that PSA screening is frequently performed counter to evidence-based guidelines. Further work is needed to determine the degree to which "prostatempathy" contributes to PSA misuse by older male providers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17620529     DOI: 10.1001/archinte.167.13.1367

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  16 in total

1.  Analysis of Physician Variation in Provision of Low-Value Services.

Authors:  Aaron L Schwartz; Anupam B Jena; Alan M Zaslavsky; J Michael McWilliams
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 21.873

2.  Older age does not impact perioperative complications after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Leah Y Nakamura; Rafael N Nunez; Paul E Andrews; Robert G Ferrigni; Mitchell R Humphreys; Scott K Swanson; Christopher E Wolter; Erik P Castle
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-02-05

3.  Do men make informed decisions about prostate cancer screening? Baseline results from the "take the wheel" trial.

Authors:  Jennifer D Allen; Megan K D Othus; Alton Hart; Anshu P Mohllajee; Yi Li; Deborah Bowen
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 2.583

4.  Medical center characteristics associated with PSA screening in elderly veterans with limited life expectancy.

Authors:  Cynthia So; Katharine A Kirby; Kala Mehta; Richard M Hoffman; Adam A Powell; Stephen J Freedland; Brenda Sirovich; Elizabeth M Yano; Louise C Walter
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Perceived value drives use of routine asymptomatic surveillance PET/CT by physicians who treat head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Benjamin R Roman; Shivangi Lohia; Nandita Mitra; Marilene B Wang; Anna M Pou; F Christopher Holsinger; David Myssiorek; David Goldenberg; David A Asch; Judy A Shea
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 3.147

6.  Associations between physician characteristics and quality of care.

Authors:  Rachel O Reid; Mark W Friedberg; John L Adams; Elizabeth A McGlynn; Ateev Mehrotra
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2010-09-13

7.  Prostate cancer screening in men ages 75 and older fell by 8 percentage points after Task Force recommendation.

Authors:  David H Howard; Florence K Tangka; Gery P Guy; Donatus U Ekwueme; Joseph Lipscomb
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 6.301

8.  Algorithms, nomograms and the detection of indolent prostate cancer.

Authors:  Monique J Roobol
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-06-07       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Prostate-specific antigen testing among the elderly in community-based family medicine practices.

Authors:  Shawna V Hudson; Pamela Ohman-Strickland; Jeanne M Ferrante; Grace Lu-Yao; A John Orzano; Benjamin F Crabtree
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.657

10.  Factors prompting PSA-testing of asymptomatic men in a country with no guidelines: a national survey of general practitioners.

Authors:  Frances J Drummond; Anne-Elie Carsin; Linda Sharp; Harry Comber
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2009-01-12       Impact factor: 2.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.