Literature DB >> 17620068

Placebo reactions in double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges in children.

B J Vlieg-Boerstra1, S van der Heide, C M A Bijleveld, J Kukler, E J Duiverman, A E J Dubois.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A cardinal feature of the double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) is that placebo administration is included as a control. To date, the occurrence and diagnostic significance of placebo events have not extensively been documented.
OBJECTIVE: To analyse the occurrence and features of placebo events in DBPCFCs and to assess their contribution to the diagnostic accuracy of the DBPCFC in children.
METHODS: The study population consisted of 132 challenges in 105 sensitized children (age range 0.7-16.6 years, median 5.3 years), who underwent DBPCFCs with cow's milk, egg, peanut, hazelnut and soy. Placebo and active food challenges were performed on different days.
RESULTS: A total number of 17 (12.9%) positive placebo events occurred, which could be classified as immediate (9/17), late-onset (8/17), objective (11/17) or subjective (6/17). Four of 74 (5.4%) positive active food challenges were revealed to be false positive by administration of a placebo challenge. This is 3% (4/132) of all challenges. When computed by a statistical model, the false positive rate was 0.129 (12.9% of all challenges).
CONCLUSION: Placebo events with diverse clinical characteristics occur in DBPCFCs in a significant number of children. The diagnostic significance of the administration of a placebo challenge is first, to identify false positive diagnoses in DBPCFCs by refuting false positive tests in individual patients. Secondly, to allow for blinding of the active food challenge. Thirdly, applying a statistical model demonstrates that some positive challenges may be false positive and that the test may need to be repeated in selected cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17620068     DOI: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2007.01430.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Allergy        ISSN: 0105-4538            Impact factor:   13.146


  16 in total

Review 1.  The dilemma of open or double-blind food challenges in diagnosing food allergy in children: Design of the ALDORADO trial.

Authors:  Wouter W de Weger; Aline B Sprikkelman; Catherina E M Herpertz; Gerbrich N van der Meulen; Judith M Vonk; Arvid W A Kamps; Gerard H Koppelman
Journal:  Pediatr Allergy Immunol       Date:  2021-09-09       Impact factor: 5.464

2.  Towards better triage of infants suspected of cow's milk allergy: development of a preliminary multivariable diagnostic index.

Authors:  Anders van Thuijl; Anne-Fleur Schoemaker; Stef Menting; Jennifer van Dulmen; Janne Boeting; Wim van Aalderen; Gerben ter Riet; Aline Sprikkelman
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2012-12-08       Impact factor: 3.183

3.  World Allergy Organization (WAO) Diagnosis and Rationale for Action against Cow's Milk Allergy (DRACMA) Guidelines.

Authors:  Alessandro Fiocchi; Jan Brozek; Holger Schünemann; Sami L Bahna; Andrea von Berg; Kirsten Beyer; Martin Bozzola; Julia Bradsher; Enrico Compalati; Motohiro Ebisawa; Maria Antonieta Guzman; Haiqi Li; Ralf G Heine; Paul Keith; Gideon Lack; Massimo Landi; Alberto Martelli; Fabienne Rancé; Hugh Sampson; Airton Stein; Luigi Terracciano; Stefan Vieths
Journal:  World Allergy Organ J       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 4.084

4.  Late type of bronchial response to milk ingestion challenge: a comparison of open and double-blind challenge.

Authors:  Zdenek Pelikan
Journal:  J Allergy (Cairo)       Date:  2011-11-03

5.  Predictive value of specific IgE for clinical peanut allergy in children: relationship with eczema, asthma, and setting (primary or secondary care).

Authors:  Wilma J van Veen; Lambert D Dikkeschei; Graham Roberts; Paul Lp Brand
Journal:  Clin Transl Allergy       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 5.871

6.  Diagnostic evaluation of food-related allergic diseases.

Authors:  John Eckman; Sarbjit S Saini; Robert G Hamilton
Journal:  Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol       Date:  2009-10-22       Impact factor: 3.406

7.  Double-blind placebo-controlled food challenges in children with alleged cow's milk allergy: prevention of unnecessary elimination diets and determination of eliciting doses.

Authors:  Wendy M Dambacher; Ellen H M de Kort; W Marty Blom; Geert F Houben; Esther de Vries
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 3.271

8.  Oral peanut challenge identifies an allergy but the peanut allergen threshold sensitivity is not reproducible.

Authors:  Susanne Glaumann; Anna Nopp; S G O Johansson; Magnus P Borres; Caroline Nilsson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Clinical practice. Diagnosis and treatment of cow's milk allergy.

Authors:  C M Frank Kneepkens; Yolanda Meijer
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2009-03-07       Impact factor: 3.183

10.  Failure of introduction of food allergens after negative oral food challenge tests in children.

Authors:  J P M van der Valk; R Gerth van Wijk; Y Vergouwe; N W de Jong
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 3.183

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.