Literature DB >> 17620051

Review of molecular diagnostics in multiple myeloma.

A Keith Stewart1, Rafael Fonseca.   

Abstract

Multiple myeloma evolves clinically from monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance through smoldering disease, active myeloma with end organ damage to a preterminal phase of extramedullary disease and marrow collapse. The molecular equivalents of such clinical observation can now be defined as genetically dormant, genetic crisis and genetic chaos (popularly termed malignant myeloma). Patients may present for the first time in any one of these stages. Not surprisingly, clinical outcomes for multiple myeloma are variable and the prospects for therapeutic responsiveness are defined by the stage at presentation. We describe here a genetically driven definition of high- and low-risk myeloma and offer guidelines for the adoption of routine diagnostic testing. We define high-risk disease as the presence of t(4;14), t(14;16), deletion 17p13 by FISH or the presence of hypodiploidy or deletion of chromosome 13 by conventional cytogenetics. By default, other patients are not considered high risk. Thus, as a minimum, we recommend routine testing for t(4;14) and 17p13 deletion by FISH and conventional cytogenetics. This classification will identify multiple myeloma patients at high genetic risk for early progression after conventional therapies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17620051     DOI: 10.1586/14737159.7.4.453

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn        ISSN: 1473-7159            Impact factor:   5.225


  7 in total

1.  Report from the European Myeloma Network on interphase FISH in multiple myeloma and related disorders.

Authors:  Fiona M Ross; Hervé Avet-Loiseau; Geneviève Ameye; Norma C Gutiérrez; Peter Liebisch; Sheila O'Connor; Klara Dalva; Sonia Fabris; Adele M Testi; Marie Jarosova; Clare Hodkinson; Anna Collin; Gitte Kerndrup; Petr Kuglik; Dariusz Ladon; Paolo Bernasconi; Brigitte Maes; Zuzana Zemanova; Kyra Michalova; Lucienne Michau; Kai Neben; N Emil U Hermansen; Katrina Rack; Alberto Rocci; Rebecca Protheroe; Laura Chiecchio; Hélène A Poirel; Pieter Sonneveld; Mette Nyegaard; Hans E Johnsen
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 9.941

2.  Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of chromosome aberrations in 60 Chinese patients with multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Xiao Gao; Chunming Li; Run Zhang; Ruifang Yang; Xiaoyan Qu; Hairong Qiu; Jiaren Xu; Hua Lu; Jianyong Li; Lijuan Chen
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 3.  Bone marrow microenvironment in myelomagenesis: its potential role in early diagnosis.

Authors:  Arun Balakumaran; Pamela Gehron Robey; Neal Fedarko; Ola Landgren
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.225

4.  Anterior mediastinum invasion by multiple myeloma: A case report.

Authors:  Ying-Hui Xu; Lu-Guo Sun; Chao Sun; Ou Bai; Ting-Ting Liang; Ke-Wei Ma
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 5.  Germline Risk Contribution to Genomic Instability in Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Siegfried Janz; Fenghuang Zhan; Fumou Sun; Yan Cheng; Michael Pisano; Ye Yang; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Parameswaran Hari
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 4.599

6.  Determination of the differential expression of mitochondrial long non-coding RNAs as a noninvasive diagnosis of bladder cancer.

Authors:  Alexis Rivas; Verónica Burzio; Eduardo Landerer; Vincenzo Borgna; Sebastian Gatica; Rodolfo Ávila; Constanza López; Claudio Villota; Rodrigo de la Fuente; Javiera Echenique; Luis O Burzio; Jaime Villegas
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 2.264

7.  A novel measure of chromosome instability can account for prognostic difference in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Tae-Hoon Chung; George Mulligan; Rafael Fonseca; Wee Joo Chng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.