Literature DB >> 17618983

Experimental models of repetitive brain injuries.

John T Weber1.   

Abstract

Repetitive traumatic brain injury (TBI) occurs in a significant portion of trauma patients, especially in specific populations, such as child abuse victims or athletes involved in contact sports (e.g. boxing, football, hockey, and soccer). A continually emerging hypothesis is that repeated mild injuries may cause cumulative damage to the brain, resulting in long-term cognitive dysfunction. The growing attention to this hypothesis is reflected in several recent experimental studies of repeated mild TBI in vivo. These reports generally demonstrate cellular and cognitive dysfunction after repetitive injury using rodent TBI models. In some cases, data suggests that the effects of a second mild TBI may be synergistic, rather than additive. In addition, some studies have found increases in cellular markers associated with Alzheimer's disease after repeated mild injuries, which demonstrates a direct experimental link between repetitive TBI and neurodegenerative disease. To complement the findings from humans and in vivo experimentation, my laboratory group has investigated the effects of repeated trauma in cultured brain cells using a model of stretch-induced mechanical injury in vitro. In these studies, hippocampal cells exhibited cumulative damage when mild stretch injuries were repeated at either 1-h or 24-h intervals. Interestingly, the extent of damage to the cells was dependent on the time between repeated injuries. Also, a very low level of stretch, which produced no cell damage on its own, induced cell damage when it was repeated several times at a short interval (every 2 min). Although direct comparisons to the clinical situation are difficult, these types of repetitive, low-level, mechanical stresses may be similar to the insults received by certain athletes, such as boxers, or hockey and soccer players. This type of in vitro model could provide a reliable system in which to study the mechanisms underlying cellular dysfunction following repeated injuries. As this area of TBI research continues to evolve, it will be imperative that models of repetitive injury replicate injuries in humans as closely as possible. For example, it will be important to model appropriately concussive episodes versus even lower level injuries (such as those that might occur during boxing matches). Suitable inter-injury intervals will also be important parameters to incorporate into models. Additionally, it will be crucial to design and utilize proper controls, which can be more challenging than experimental approaches to single mild TBI. It will also be essential to combine, and compare, data derived from in vitro experiments with those conducted with animals in vivo. These issues, as well as a summary of findings from repeated TBI research, are discussed in this review.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17618983     DOI: 10.1016/S0079-6123(06)61018-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Brain Res        ISSN: 0079-6123            Impact factor:   2.453


  25 in total

1.  A mouse model of human repetitive mild traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Michael J Kane; Mariana Angoa-Pérez; Denise I Briggs; David C Viano; Christian W Kreipke; Donald M Kuhn
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2011-09-12       Impact factor: 2.390

Review 2.  Boxing-acute complications and late sequelae: from concussion to dementia.

Authors:  Hans Förstl; Christian Haass; Bernhard Hemmer; Bernhard Meyer; Martin Halle
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 3.  Neuroimaging biomarkers in mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI).

Authors:  Erin D Bigler
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2013-08-24       Impact factor: 7.444

4.  Decreased microvascular cerebral blood flow assessed by diffuse correlation spectroscopy after repetitive concussions in mice.

Authors:  Erin M Buckley; Benjamin F Miller; Julianne M Golinski; Homa Sadeghian; Lauren M McAllister; Mark Vangel; Cenk Ayata; William P Meehan; Maria Angela Franceschini; Michael J Whalen
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 6.200

5.  Increasing recovery time between injuries improves cognitive outcome after repetitive mild concussive brain injuries in mice.

Authors:  William P Meehan; Jimmy Zhang; Rebekah Mannix; Michael J Whalen
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.654

6.  Effects of chronic mild traumatic brain injury on white matter integrity in Iraq and Afghanistan war veterans.

Authors:  Rajendra A Morey; Courtney C Haswell; Elizabeth S Selgrade; Dino Massoglia; Chunlei Liu; Jonathan Weiner; Christine E Marx; Ibolja Cernak; Gregory McCarthy
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Early cortical thickness change after mild traumatic brain injury following motor vehicle collision.

Authors:  Xin Wang; Hong Xie; Andrew S Cotton; Marijo B Tamburrino; Kristopher R Brickman; Terrence J Lewis; Samuel A McLean; Israel Liberzon
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 5.269

Review 8.  Animal models of traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Ye Xiong; Asim Mahmood; Michael Chopp
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 34.870

9.  Mild Traumatic Brain Injury among the Geriatric Population.

Authors:  Linda Papa; Matthew E Mendes; Carolina F Braga
Journal:  Curr Transl Geriatr Exp Gerontol Rep       Date:  2012-09-01

10.  Cortical Thickness in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Koushik A Govindarajan; Ponnada A Narayana; Khader M Hasan; Elisabeth A Wilde; Harvey S Levin; Jill V Hunter; Emmy R Miller; Vipul Kumar S Patel; Claudia S Robertson; James J McCarthy
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 5.269

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.